Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings >

Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 11:49 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
BKK4Life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: QB/@Lolitas/Baccara
Posts: 28
Thumbs down

WOW. I'm amazed at all the BS you people spout off here. Please educate yourself and quit posting false information. Totally clueless.

Transcripts WILL BE RELEASED!
BKK4Life is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 03:34 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

This is bad for the legacy of the two pilots. However, it is human nature that someone's got to hang for this.

However, I seriously doubt they weren't trained on a stick pusher. That is a pretty elementary feature of a passenger transport aircraft. Likely they had experience with these (esp the CA) before this aircraft.
bryris is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 03:51 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cruise's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by ERJF15 View Post
Yes. NTSB "Sunshine" hearings are always held post investigation. CVR recordings, by law, are not allowed to be released.
The hearing that is taking place next week IS NOT the "sunshine" hearing. Expect that to take place in late '09 or early '10. The "sunshine" hearing is when the NTSB releases their 'probable cause' findings. The upcoming hearing is to gain additional facts....NOTHING MORE. There will be no analysis at the completion of the hearing next week.

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
No, they are not, but written transcripts of the recordings are. Never say anything in the cockpit that your family and friends won't be embarrassed by.
Correct, the written transcript will be released at approx. 0730 on the 12th. Not before!

Originally Posted by selcal View Post
so we will never see the transcript?
See above!

Originally Posted by bryris View Post
This is bad for the legacy of the two pilots. However, it is human nature that someone's got to hang for this.

However, I seriously doubt they weren't trained on a stick pusher. That is a pretty elementary feature of a passenger transport aircraft. Likely they had experience with these (esp the CA) before this aircraft.
Wrong! Very few 121 operators train pilots in 'stick pusher' events. Most, if not all, stall recovery training syllabi teach pilots to recover at 'first indication of stall,' which means at the shaker. As you're probably aware, the shaker only means you're 'approaching' a stalled condition.....but the wings are still flying at that point. I'd imagine many 121 training programs will be changed to include some form of stick pusher recoveries in the future.
Cruise is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 04:39 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

transcript/cvr facts (i know 95% of people on here hate that 4 letter word) here:

NTSB - CVR & FDR
mooney is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 04:57 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 842
Default

ive been through three 121 training programs and in all but one of them we trained to pusher. On the checkride you dont obviously test the stall manuver to a pusher but we have all seen them (except for E170 pilots and maybe some airbus types where the airplane wont let the critical angle of attack be exceeded through computer controls in the fly by wire systems) However I wonder if they ever did any stall training with the Ice speeds increased through that INCR button. The reaction of the airplane in a normal stall condition compared to an INCR stall with no real accumulation of ice on the airframe could possibly be a very different event than one that was normaly trained.
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:08 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cruise's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by Killer51883 View Post
ive been through three 121 training programs and in all but one of them we trained to pusher. On the checkride you dont obviously test the stall manuver to a pusher but we have all seen them (except for E170 pilots and maybe some airbus types where the airplane wont let the critical angle of attack be exceeded through computer controls in the fly by wire systems) However I wonder if they ever did any stall training with the Ice speeds increased through that INCR button. The reaction of the airplane in a normal stall condition compared to an INCR stall with no real accumulation of ice on the airframe could possibly be a very different event than one that was normaly trained.
Good to hear at least some 121 carriers are training to pusher. I've talked to several people at different carriers...and none had done so thus far.
Cruise is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:09 PM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,375
Default

While a 121 pilot may be trained on the pusher initially, nobody that I have talked to about this (various airlines) gets pusher training at recurrent, just shaker.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:36 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by Cruise View Post

Wrong! Very few 121 operators train pilots in 'stick pusher' events. Most, if not all, stall recovery training syllabi teach pilots to recover at 'first indication of stall,' which means at the shaker. As you're probably aware, the shaker only means you're 'approaching' a stalled condition.....but the wings are still flying at that point. I'd imagine many 121 training programs will be changed to include some form of stick pusher recoveries in the future.
You're right in fact if you get the pusher in training or a check ride you've probably failed that task. I'm sure the FAA will recommended some sort of additional training but it will be a moot point. The point is not to get a stick shaker anyways at 1500 agl and we already train for that. What are you going to train to the pusher for?
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:40 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain152's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Default

Ok, I'll agree with the fact that not many of us are trained to handle stall scenarios to the pusher ... but how is that in any way/shape/form the pilots' fault? Doesn't make much sense to me.

I agree Purpleanga ... it won't do much good to train to the pusher at 1500 agl ... there's not a whole lot you can do at that low of alt except train to not let it get that far.
captain152 is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:47 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: DAL 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default

I think we're missing the point here folks. The fact that these 2 pilots put this airplane into a position to get the stick pusher shows inadequate skills or training. Whether or not they were trained to handle a stick pusher activation is not the issue IMHO.
The dude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
Seggy
Regional
3
03-08-2009 02:33 PM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices