Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings >

Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009 | 05:56 PM
  #21  
coldpilot's Avatar
DisplAAced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by The dude
I think we're missing the point here folks. The fact that these 2 pilots put this airplane into a position to get the stick pusher shows inadequate skills or training. Whether or not they were trained to handle a stick pusher activation is not the issue IMHO.
I think when it comes to training that it CAN be the issue and quite possibly the difference between a successful and unsuccessful outcome. Eagle will eventually transition to AQP so more realistic scenarios are encountered in the sim. Why go fart around doing maneuvers that aren't being applied to a line flying type situation. This is also the theory behind the FITS program that you are seeing TAA manufacturers switch to.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 05:59 PM
  #22  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

While I agree we, as professional aviators, should never allow an aircraft to reach the pusher. The fact of the matter is it has happened, and will continue to do so. Accidents happen/ mistakes are made regularly....it's our job to attempt to mitigate them through education and practice.

However, I contest training to a pusher will serve little usefulness at 1500 AGL. There is a discussion about this very subject taking place on another popular aviation board. Should an aircraft enter into a fully developed stall while on an approach, it would be very useful to have training that forces a pilot to accept the pusher driving the nose towards an already very near tera-firma. Human nature would resist driving an aircraft's nose toward the ground when you're already at a very low AGL..... So you see, by reacting to human nature, a pilot in this situation could deepen a stall to the point where recovery would be impossible, or nearly so. Add to that, night IMC where there are few visual cues to assist in recovery, coupled with a variety of somatogravic illusions as you increase thrust/ torque.....you could wind up in a very, very troubling attitude. As such, I would say training to a pusher event at low altitudes (such as approach configuration stalls) would serve a very useful purpose.

FYI, I'm not trying to be confrontational here......just throwing out some food-for-thought.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 06:08 PM
  #23  
The dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: DAL 737 FO
Default

I don't think stalling a part 121 passenger carrying turbo prop is a "mistake". A mistake is dialing a wrong frequency, a wrong inbound course, a missed fix in a flight plan etc...

I think the issue is the airlines' (especially the regionals) tendency to push people through training who don't have the necessary stick and rudder and/or judgment skills to safely operate a complex aircraft. I've seen it with my own eyes numerous times as a former regional guy.

I'm not necessarily saying this particular crew was skill-deficient, but the scenario does point that direction.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 06:19 PM
  #24  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by The dude
I don't think stalling a part 121 passenger carrying turbo prop is a "mistake". A mistake is dialing a wrong frequency, a wrong inbound course, a missed fix in a flight plan etc...

I think the issue is the airlines' (especially the regionals) tendency to push people through training who don't have the necessary stick and rudder and/or judgment skills to safely operate a complex aircraft. I've seen it with my own eyes numerous times as a former regional guy.
Which is precisely why I said accidents/ mistakes. Also, if there are any pilots out there who think they'll never stall an aircraft because they're too good......I don't want to fly with you. None of us are above making a MISTAKE that could develop into an ACCIDENT. Remember, stalling an aircraft happens through numerous breakdowns in action. No single event can be blamed. Chain of events, anyone???

Also, being arrogant about the skills you possess is a surefire way of doing something stupid and winding up dead. Keep in mind, it doesn't matter if you're a 777 pilot, 152 pilot or anything in between.......you're not impervious to serious mistakes. Obviously, many factors go into mitigating the possibility of something serious happening, but the fact remains the same....we're all human....and on occasion, humans do dumb things!

Fly safely out there, folks!
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 07:09 PM
  #25  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Originally Posted by Cruise
Wrong! Very few 121 operators train pilots in 'stick pusher' events. Most, if not all, stall recovery training syllabi teach pilots to recover at 'first indication of stall,' which means at the shaker. As you're probably aware, the shaker only means you're 'approaching' a stalled condition.....but the wings are still flying at that point. I'd imagine many 121 training programs will be changed to include some form of stick pusher recoveries in the future.
I cannot relate to this A/C, but typically there is a big red button on the yoke that deactivates four things - one of these being the stick pusher. I was certainly trained on how to override a pusher and do not think that my training was the exception to the rule.

I believe most any pilot with adequate awareness of altitude would have pushed the button at a stick pusher to override the system. The problem was likely lack of time to figure out the situation.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 07:23 PM
  #26  
FL450's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Thrill Seat
Default

Originally Posted by The dude
I don't think stalling a part 121 passenger carrying turbo prop is a "mistake". A mistake is dialing a wrong frequency, a wrong inbound course, a missed fix in a flight plan etc...

I think the issue is the airlines' (especially the regionals) tendency to push people through training who don't have the necessary stick and rudder and/or judgment skills to safely operate a complex aircraft. I've seen it with my own eyes numerous times as a former regional guy.

I'm not necessarily saying this particular crew was skill-deficient, but the scenario does point that direction.
Not to get in to who's wrong or right but there are numerous "accidents" which you can make this comment about, including 135, and part 91. Over the years we've seen gulfstreams crash on approach into aspen and lear jets hit hills in greenland, and Challengers run off icy runways on take off. To have the attitude that mistakes don't happen or that a mistake can only be a wrong frequency is pretty harsh. Just dialing in the wrong NDB freq and thinking that it is the right one can be the very key in the chain of events that lead to a crash. I have to side with Cruise on this one that we as professional aviators don't train for real world scenerios most of the time in the sim and this needs to change. Had you been in the same situation can you really say that you would have done anything different who knows? I'm not saying that we should turn our heads and act as if this didn't happen but don't bash the crew as if they weren't trained to the same standard you or I were.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 09:12 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The dude
I don't think stalling a part 121 passenger carrying turbo prop is a "mistake". A mistake is dialing a wrong frequency, a wrong inbound course, a missed fix in a flight plan etc...

I think the issue is the airlines' (especially the regionals) tendency to push people through training who don't have the necessary stick and rudder and/or judgment skills to safely operate a complex aircraft. I've seen it with my own eyes numerous times as a former regional guy.

I'm not necessarily saying this particular crew was skill-deficient, but the scenario does point that direction.
I agree. When I came off of regional airline training I didn't really know how to keep the airplane from stalling at the FAF approach speed... The crew was skilled enough. The CA came from the saab and was just out of 400 training. The FO supposedly had prior Dash8 experince before colgan. Let's wait before blaming us lowly regional pilots.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 10:53 PM
  #28  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

The article mentioned insufficient training. If this eventually is a contributing factor, I submit that the FAA should bear some of the responsibility since THEY approved the syllabus.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 11:50 PM
  #29  
Blkflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Cessna 152 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by The dude
I don't think stalling a part 121 passenger carrying turbo prop is a "mistake". A mistake is dialing a wrong frequency, a wrong inbound course, a missed fix in a flight plan etc...

I think the issue is the airlines' (especially the regionals) tendency to push people through training who don't have the necessary stick and rudder and/or judgment skills to safely operate a complex aircraft. I've seen it with my own eyes numerous times as a former regional guy.

I'm not necessarily saying this particular crew was skill-deficient, but the scenario does point that direction.
Geeze Louise Are you for real? are you going to turn this in a low time high time pilot issue..

Remember Tenerife : Capt Jacob Veldhuyzen van Zanten I am sure was an experience pilot but the fact is his actions cost hundreds of people their lives, some said earlier that pilots make mistakes and no matter how you slice it we are all exposed to tons of threats by the very nature of our work singling out a certain segment of our profession and then making comments like you did dont help. as long as there is Liveware in the cockpit mistakes will be made.

Mistakes you listed can have devastating results just like a navigation error which caused KAL 007 to be shot down or AA 965 to end up in CFIT in cali. Its easy to sit and talk about folks when they are not around and cannot defend themself but be mindful that you dont take the attitude that it can never happen to me cause I am super pilot ultra experience

RIP Marvin and Rebecca
Reply
Old 05-08-2009 | 08:08 AM
  #30  
The dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: DAL 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by FL450
Not to get in to who's wrong or right but there are numerous "accidents" which you can make this comment about, including 135, and part 91. Over the years we've seen gulfstreams crash on approach into aspen and lear jets hit hills in greenland, and Challengers run off icy runways on take off. To have the attitude that mistakes don't happen or that a mistake can only be a wrong frequency is pretty harsh. Just dialing in the wrong NDB freq and thinking that it is the right one can be the very key in the chain of events that lead to a crash. I have to side with Cruise on this one that we as professional aviators don't train for real world scenerios most of the time in the sim and this needs to change. Had you been in the same situation can you really say that you would have done anything different who knows? I'm not saying that we should turn our heads and act as if this didn't happen but don't bash the crew as if they weren't trained to the same standard you or I were.
Okay everyone settle down. I'm not bashing the crew. Reality check....roughly 80% of accidents are caused by pilot error. This one PROBABLY was too. If you guys think that's bashing the crew, then so be it. It's just reality. It's simply part of our job when we sign for an airplane and get in the seat. This is a performance based job.

I'm not saying I would have or would not have done anything here. I'm simply offering my opinion. You guys are all entitled to yours as well.

Fly safe.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
Seggy
Regional
3
03-08-2009 02:33 PM
whtever
Regional
110
12-15-2008 09:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices