![]() |
Originally Posted by imlars
(Post 1121272)
Well they are getting old....could predict the same for many 15 to 20 year old equipment? Sure they will be gone, like the shorts, saab, metro liner, Jetstream......the key is what replaces them. The former were replaced by 300 regional jets. That era is ending, albeit at a slow pace. I heard all airplanes will be gone in a 100 years.....just saying.
|
Originally Posted by Machwon
(Post 1121366)
How do you figure they are getting old? Average hours for the ERJ 35/45 is around 50,000 hours. I think we have a handful over 30 but below 35 while the majority of the others are all low to mid 20s. Sounds like we have plenty of years left on them.
|
It seems to me in their sales website at one point that I read that the EMBs were designed for a 65,000 cycle life.
|
My observation is that the erj is/was a quick turbo prop conversion designed for a relatively short life span. At one point I recall a 20000 hour airframe limit. This has gone up as it has performed somewhat better and longer than designed. I don't think Embraer had two to three hour stage lengths in mind 12 years ago. That has saved a ton of cycles on the airframe. They still seem tired to me. The reliability of the older half of the fleet seems less to me. Twenty years for an airliner is a long time. Twenty years on a regional airliner is a very long time. Life limited parts, finishing parts, dispatch reliability all figure into operating costs. I dont claim to be an airline economist, but I surmise that at one point the cost of operating an older airframe crosses the line into a need to acquire new equipment due to pure economics. Eagle launched EMB 600 and 601 in May of 1998 in ORD, (I had a piece of cake and punch, there was some balloons too!) I believe both are back from TSA sabbatical putting them at 14 years this May. Time flies. I keep my opinion they are old. Albeit, some older then others.
|
Originally Posted by imlars
(Post 1121710)
My observation is that the erj is/was a quick turbo prop conversion designed for a relatively short life span. At one point I recall a 20000 hour airframe limit. This has gone up as it has performed somewhat better and longer than designed. I don't think Embraer had two to three hour stage lengths in mind 12 years ago. That has saved a ton of cycles on the airframe. They still seem tired to me. The reliability of the older half of the fleet seems less to me. Twenty years for an airliner is a long time. Twenty years on a regional airliner is a very long time. Life limited parts, finishing parts, dispatch reliability all figure into operating costs. I dont claim to be an airline economist, but I surmise that at one point the cost of operating an older airframe crosses the line into a need to acquire new equipment due to pure economics. Eagle launched EMB 600 and 601 in May of 1998 in ORD, (I had a piece of cake and punch, there was some balloons too!) I believe both are back from TSA sabbatical putting them at 14 years this May. Time flies. I keep my opinion they are old. Albeit, some older then others.
|
Originally Posted by imlars
(Post 1121272)
Well they are getting old....could predict the same for many 15 to 20 year old equipment? Sure they will be gone, like the shorts, saab, metro liner, Jetstream......the key is what replaces them. The former were replaced by 300 regional jets. That era is ending, albeit at a slow pace. I heard all airplanes will be gone in a 100 years.....just saying.
|
Originally Posted by snippercr
(Post 1121923)
A scrub told me they think all 135/140/145s parked by next year, and half the CRJ fleet after that. I might need to start polishing my resume after all cause this is sounding serious.
|
Originally Posted by snippercr
(Post 1121923)
A scrub told me they think all 135/140/145s parked by next year, and half the CRJ fleet after that. I might need to start polishing my resume after all cause this is sounding serious.
|
Heard from a different source that all the 135/140s are removed from the maint paint schedule.
|
Originally Posted by Stryker
(Post 1122097)
Sounds like someone has been playing "lets swallow the stuff under the sink".... Real reliable source...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands