Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Multi Requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2010 | 03:32 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: 320 CA
Default

I'm a CFI and can understand how you feel. That being said a pilot that has passed 121 training is a better option then the ones who haven't. They know that pilot can pass the training required. They also know that that pilot already has the experience necessary to operate under 121 rules. They also know that that pilot knows what he is getting into when it comes to the 121 world.

A CFI that has never been with an airline is an unknown. Who knows if he will get through training at all let alone really get proficient.

On a side not: The way you are writing isn't helping your argument. All the "dudes" and "bros" make you sound like a kid and not a professional.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 04:12 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

I hope 1,500 TT and 1,000 Multi or even 1,500 Multi would be nice
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 04:25 PM
  #33  
SuperPilotJesse's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: EX - OHJFKCRJFO
Default

Originally Posted by CFItillIdie
Chuck Yeager period dot

But I do not have compassion for dudes who collect a check and sit on the couch with no desire to get back down in the trenches and do some stalls and falls.
What about someone who has been furloughed but never "collected a check" but instead traveled and actually used flight benefits?

Also I totally think they have the right to "collect a check". You pay into it just for this purpose. If your wife has a baby and you use the insurance you pay for no one will criticize you for using it.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 04:31 PM
  #34  
A320fan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: C172 Right
Default

Ok, I can't keep my mouth shut anymore. Before I say this, I want anyone who responds to this to know that:
-Yes, I am only in flight training.
-I acknowledge that I don't know exactly how the 121 world works, and there's only one way for me to learn.
-I have nothing but respect for the guys who already did it, everyone on furlough, everyone who's a CFI, and think that yes, they should get hired first.

Now.....what I gather from this thread is that if you have any desire to make it to anything ran by the numbers 1, 2, and 1, your "time" flying 172's and Seminoles is absolutely worthless, even as a CFI. To get hired by a 121 carrier of any kind, you need 121 experience, and to get 121 experience, you need to get hired by a 121 carrier, no exceptions. It almost seems that unless you already made it through a 121 training program, you have less than no chance at coming close to this scene. My little time flying "airplane" (172's) will do nothing more than allow me to be a career CFI, and take on all the disrespect that comes with it. How much of this is accurate? I have no intention to offend anyone here, I just want to know the facts.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 04:58 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Originally Posted by A320fan
Ok, I can't keep my mouth shut anymore. Before I say this, I want anyone who responds to this to know that:
-Yes, I am only in flight training.
-I acknowledge that I don't know exactly how the 121 world works, and there's only one way for me to learn.
-I have nothing but respect for the guys who already did it, everyone on furlough, everyone who's a CFI, and think that yes, they should get hired first.

Now.....what I gather from this thread is that if you have any desire to make it to anything ran by the numbers 1, 2, and 1, your "time" flying 172's and Seminoles is absolutely worthless, even as a CFI. To get hired by a 121 carrier of any kind, you need 121 experience, and to get 121 experience, you need to get hired by a 121 carrier, no exceptions. It almost seems that unless you already made it through a 121 training program, you have less than no chance at coming close to this scene. My little time flying "airplane" (172's) will do nothing more than allow me to be a career CFI, and take on all the disrespect that comes with it. How much of this is accurate? I have no intention to offend anyone here, I just want to know the facts.
You don't need 121 experience to get hired by a 121 operator in theory, just during these times it's a big plus. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with 91 or 135 flying, it's just that with all these furloughed pilots on the street, the strong likelihood is that they'll get hired first. Like it or not, if a pilot passes 121 training and goes through IOE, whether or not they fly another hour after that before getting furloughed, they are more qualified than a 91 or 135 pilot without that experience. Jets are jets, so jet operators from the 91 and 135 world will be viewed favorably, but the SCHEDULE and all the other crap that you have to deal with in the 121 world is what makes it most challenging.

Also, like others have said, the danger with hiring non 121 people is that their training capacity is an unknown. With a 121 person, you know they're going to pass training. It's not that non-121 pilots will never get hired, it's just that right now there are so many of our union brothers and sisters on the street that we feel deserve to be brought back into the fold before all the others.

The time will come, probably sooner than we all think, when non-121 pilots will be hired, but anybody who thinks that any airline is going to push furloughees aside to pick up CFIs is kidding themselves.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 05:03 PM
  #36  
fjetter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: King Air 200 CA Hawker 800/900 FO
Default

Originally Posted by A320fan
Ok, I can't keep my mouth shut anymore. Before I say this, I want anyone who responds to this to know that:
-Yes, I am only in flight training.
-I acknowledge that I don't know exactly how the 121 world works, and there's only one way for me to learn.
-I have nothing but respect for the guys who already did it, everyone on furlough, everyone who's a CFI, and think that yes, they should get hired first.

Now.....what I gather from this thread is that if you have any desire to make it to anything ran by the numbers 1, 2, and 1, your "time" flying 172's and Seminoles is absolutely worthless, even as a CFI. To get hired by a 121 carrier of any kind, you need 121 experience, and to get 121 experience, you need to get hired by a 121 carrier, no exceptions. It almost seems that unless you already made it through a 121 training program, you have less than no chance at coming close to this scene. My little time flying "airplane" (172's) will do nothing more than allow me to be a career CFI, and take on all the disrespect that comes with it. How much of this is accurate? I have no intention to offend anyone here, I just want to know the facts.

I could see how you think it's a catch-22 but, what the real debate is not that the experienced CFI is not qualified to get hired by a regional, but rather that the furloughed 121 guy is BETTER qualified for that position. You have to remember that HR makes a lot of these hiring decisions. It just simply makes sense that the 121 guy has been there before and gotten through the training and can do it again. I'm all for giving CFIs and experienced piston guys a chance but someone that is unable to make it through training costs the company money and its their job to select candidates that have the lowest risk of costing the company additional money.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #37  
pilot772's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: UAL Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by CFItillIdie
Chuck Yeager period dot

I probably have buddies at your airline, so let me know your name so I can have them tell you. Listen, I'm not here to make friends because I have them already. But if you are going to try and make subtle attacks on dudes for having a strong and unpopular opinion on things, that shows character. I understand that a lot of dudes on here have bro's that are on the street, and I have compassion for anyone who loses a job without it being their doing. But I do not have compassion for dudes who collect a check and sit on the couch with no desire to get back down in the trenches and do some stalls and falls. That would require two things, 1) Determination and 2) Luck to find a school that will take them knowing that they will be gone as soon as they get their number called.
And those are the people I respect. So if you are going to show solidarity and turn a blind eye to those who have no determination to further their professionalism, then YOU are part of the problem. I understand this is a tough market for even CFI's, but where there is a will there's a way.

What I am advocating is that if the airlines are going to have this standard where they are going to hold high minimums they should consider everyone who has a flying job and high flight time first. The dude that got furloughed after two months of being on reserve AND who has not been flying for a year plus, should not be ahead of the dude that has been teaching stud's in the clouds on IFR plans every day, and risking their necks to let students go from VFR to IFR pilots for the past couple of years. Tell me who you would rather be flying with? Dude who has been sitting on the couch popping bon bons collecting a check, or the guy who is a go getter who has been teaching for ~2 years that is above ATP mins? Are you honestly asserting that young furlough who was fed enough bananas to pass a 121 will be better than someone who has maybe 141 schooling, college degree, military background and maybe a little life experience? I don't think so. Wow, talk about a run on sentence....

I am gonna get off the soap box here in a hot second, but here is the deal, I am not here to **** in anyone's Cheerios, but I am tired of seeing people on here talk about how they feel that every single dude who's furloughed deserves to get hired to another airline over someone who is well qualified with high PIC time. Who cares if it is in a 172 or a C90. They have paid their dues somehow. If you are furloughed and don't have a current flying job, what have you been doing to improve yourself? That is my question. If you can answer that better than I can, then you deserve the job.

1500 TT 500 ME Current flying job or recent relevant flight time. Thats my opinion. And PM me if you want my name. I'll give it to ya.
Wow you are completely clueless. Lets take my scenario I am "just sitting on the couch collecting unemployment" as you put it. I have 3500 hours in the CRJ of which over 1000 as the captain. I am now furloughed from NetJets having been there for over 2 years. I have applied for every job under the sun (within reason for my situation wife in Medical school and baby on the way.) As far as CFI'ing well you said it yourself that you have been waiting for 2 years, not a lot of CFI jobs out there. Even if there was on in my area again you said it yourself, "they won't hire me because I would bolt as soon as something else came along." As for the guy I want in the seat next to me let me tell you a few stories: Flying with a guy who had been a CFI for 4 years a month or two off of IOE almost stalled the CRJ on base to final going into IAD, the former CFI I flew with during a medical emergency absolutely froze while we were trying to coordinate with ATC, Medlink, and the company, or the former CFI who couldn't talk on the radio to save his life. Conversely I flew with an FO who had been away from flying for 10-15 years but he was formerly at Fed EX, he was one of the best FO's I ever had. Now I understand everybody is different but if it were me I would want the former 121 driver who has experience with thunderstorms, MEL's, EDICTS, Flow restrictions, flown the river visual, has dealt with reduced rest overnights, I could go on and on even if it has been a year or two. Time will tell what happens I'm sure.

Oh yeah I do have a 4 year degree and went through a 141 school, so have a lot of folks on the street.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:09 PM
  #38  
colead3's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 700/FO-Furloughed
Default

Originally Posted by CFItillIdie
Chuck Yeager period dot

I probably have buddies at your airline, so let me know your name so I can have them tell you. Listen, I'm not here to make friends because I have them already. But if you are going to try and make subtle attacks on dudes for having a strong and unpopular opinion on things, that shows character. I understand that a lot of dudes on here have bro's that are on the street, and I have compassion for anyone who loses a job without it being their doing. But I do not have compassion for dudes who collect a check and sit on the couch with no desire to get back down in the trenches and do some stalls and falls. That would require two things, 1) Determination and 2) Luck to find a school that will take them knowing that they will be gone as soon as they get their number called.
And those are the people I respect. So if you are going to show solidarity and turn a blind eye to those who have no determination to further their professionalism, then YOU are part of the problem. I understand this is a tough market for even CFI's, but where there is a will there's a way.

What I am advocating is that if the airlines are going to have this standard where they are going to hold high minimums they should consider everyone who has a flying job and high flight time first. The dude that got furloughed after two months of being on reserve AND who has not been flying for a year plus, should not be ahead of the dude that has been teaching stud's in the clouds on IFR plans every day, and risking their necks to let students go from VFR to IFR pilots for the past couple of years. Tell me who you would rather be flying with? Dude who has been sitting on the couch popping bon bons collecting a check, or the guy who is a go getter who has been teaching for ~2 years that is above ATP mins? Are you honestly asserting that young furlough who was fed enough bananas to pass a 121 will be better than someone who has maybe 141 schooling, college degree, military background and maybe a little life experience? I don't think so. Wow, talk about a run on sentence....

I am gonna get off the soap box here in a hot second, but here is the deal, I am not here to **** in anyone's Cheerios, but I am tired of seeing people on here talk about how they feel that every single dude who's furloughed deserves to get hired to another airline over someone who is well qualified with high PIC time. Who cares if it is in a 172 or a C90. They have paid their dues somehow. If you are furloughed and don't have a current flying job, what have you been doing to improve yourself? That is my question. If you can answer that better than I can, then you deserve the job.

1500 TT 500 ME Current flying job or recent relevant flight time. Thats my opinion. And PM me if you want my name. I'll give it to ya.
Just a question.. So I am furloughed, got a job as a performance supervisor for the operations of Delta Connection at an airport because of the lack of jobs.. Due to the fact I am not current I shouldn't have my job back? It is really expensive to just rent a plane these days (And yes supervisors make less than first year FO's), and I personally don't know any furloughed pilot just "eating bon bons.." The ones I know are working the ramp, somewhere else in their airline, or even Applebees because they can't find anything else. You aren't the only one working hard dude.. 99 percent of us are just trying to get by with what we can get.. flying or not. I am just glad to have the opportunity to explore and see the management side of the industry while I am on furlough.. No I am not current, but yes I work just as hard as you for probably less money.

Last edited by colead3; 04-08-2010 at 06:25 PM.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #39  
colead3's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 700/FO-Furloughed
Default

OH and PS.. Talk to me after you've dumped a lav on the same jet you are rated to fly while on furlough!
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 07:57 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by colead3
OH and PS.. Talk to me after you've dumped a lav on the same jet you are rated to fly while on furlough!
That shows some serious work ethic and integrity if you ask me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AllyHigh
Flight Schools and Training
22
04-17-2018 01:52 AM
MtLott
Flight Schools and Training
0
10-07-2009 06:26 PM
MBpilot
Flight Schools and Training
3
07-27-2009 12:09 PM
block30
Flight Schools and Training
25
06-08-2009 05:06 AM
jcaplins
Flight Schools and Training
8
05-21-2009 03:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices