Originally Posted by jheath

. I'm logging out for good.

Originally Posted by CAPTAINPCL

....I would love it if some day the Q would be based in MSP or ORD, I would be all over it baby!!!

Originally Posted by Fly782

Also I have seen just as many CRJ/ ERJ pilots talk down to Tprop pilots, whats the difference or your point?

Originally Posted by PruneJuice

I'm sure it will but the question is for what airline.

Originally Posted by B00sted

The JET pays more, therefore requires more skill than a turboprop, mainly due to it being a high performance machine. Let me put it like this: A Saab is like a Geo Metro, a Q400 is like a station wagon, a JET is a like a highly tuned Ferrari Italia...

Originally Posted by B00sted

The JET pays more, therefore requires more skill than a turboprop, mainly due to it being a high performance machine. Let me put it like this: A Saab is like a Geo Metro, a Q400 is like a station wagon, a JET is a like a highly tuned Ferrari Italia...

Originally Posted by jayray2

Can we all get back on topic and start complaining about the Bloch award please? What a crock of . . . I wish someone would of had the marbles (and money) to file a lawsuit. ALPA is a joke, no merger policy, no scope policy and no backbone to stand up for increased hiring minimums. I hope Delta is able to form their own Union and put an end to ALPA.

Originally Posted by Ramprat

Please..The Q will still do 250ish below 10 and will climb like a raped ape. I think if one can handle a Q, CRJ should be no issue, and vice versa. And you have to worry about dragging the tail. And the Saab? Well hope you are on top of your game on flying using ground based nav.

Saying a jet requires more skill is debatable. And a CRJ is a not the equivalent of a Ferrari, sorry.

Originally Posted by jheath

For one, I never called SkyWest a "better" regional. Going there would be a lateral move. Two, I never cried at any point during training. Three, I interviewed at SkyWest because my girlfriend got a job in Chicago and I thought it might be nice to live in base. Four, I have a Nov 28th class date there, which I've all but decided now NOT to take as I held my seat and it seems I might actually be able to get off reserve someday here. Five, I could have taken a voluntary displacement into the jet last month if that's really what I was interested in.

I quit posting for like two months because apparently I can't say anything about anything without anonymous internet tough guys thinking they "called me out" by perpetuating some lame rumor made up buy a guy in my class who was salty that he didn't have enough multi time to fly the Q. Some of you guys enjoy being jerks SO much when your name and face aren't attached to your words and you'll never have to own up to them it's actually really sad. Whatever guys, enjoy your debate, looking forward to flying with some of you on the line. I'm logging out for good.

Originally Posted by Ramprat

Please..The Q will still do 250ish below 10 and will climb like a raped ape. I think if one can handle a Q, CRJ should be no issue, and vice versa. And you have to worry about dragging the tail. And the Saab? Well hope you are on top of your game on flying using ground based nav.

Saying a jet requires more skill is debatable. And a CRJ is a not the equivalent of a Ferrari, sorry.