Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ATP Law Petition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:00 PM
  #221  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
Listen, i'm not saying that the university wonderkid with 350 hours is better than you. I'm saying that we need to combine a requirement for experience as well as education rather than rely solely on experience. The current FAA requirements to operate an airliner are laughable. I'm suggesting increases in both experience and education.

By the way, the Jetstream is located along the polar front between the tropical airmass and the neighboring westerlies. Its the Flower looking blob in the middle waving in and out around the two continental lows of 520 and 524 MB. Its called a zonal system because of its erratic north and south movement. If you cross that front, beware of CAT and turn the sign on to avoid potential turbulence related accidents.

Can I ask if you know the inner workings of an ILS or Rho Theta system?
Do you fly those approaches fairly well without knowing about the ins and outs of those systems?
There is education, and then there is penny knowledge.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:00 PM
  #222  
lear 31 pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

USMC, I agree seems pretty silly to cut out military guys who have been flying nothing but jets. But other then that I say 1500 hard minimum.
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:02 PM
  #223  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
Not all CFI's spend all their time in the pattern. As a CFI, I made every effort to get out into the IMC- to benefit me as well as the student.

For the record, I think the law should be 1500hrs, no exceptions. No military waiver, no big flight school waiver. 1500hr is not a lot to ask if you really want to be a professional pilot.



As a military guy I agree 100%. The 1500 hour rule with the military is pretty much a "made-up" argument anyway. Until the early 80s there was mostly a 4 year post winging commitment, which was raised to 5, then 6, and is now 7 or 8 unless it has changed again.

The bottom line is the number of guys that this might affect is very, very small, and if they really want to be airline Pilots they can pretty much ensure that they either come out of the military with 1500+ hours, or else they fly a little on their own and total 1500+ hours.

As far as the less than 1500 hour military guy goes, for the most part this is pretty much a solution looking for a problem. Yes, there may be a very few guys affected, but enough to merit a waiver?

The ME minimums may need to be addressed for the Fighter types, but not the 1500hrs.

Scoop
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:05 PM
  #224  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by cornbeef007
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

100% correct

To think that a puppy mill replaces experience is ignorant. Nothing replaces experience.

I've flown with a few guys in this situation; A F18 guy is fresh out of the Navy. Is he a bad ***? Yes. Do I cringe when I hear we have an 8 knot crosswind? Yep Give him some "EXPERIENCE" in a heavy jet, he will be just fine.
As well you should because he is probably still having to *think* about taking out ALL of the crab before landing instead of just half of it (spoken from experience and not even a heavy jet guy!)

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:30 PM
  #225  
Senior Skipper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: the correct seat
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
Notice I said CFI. That does not imply or infer CFII or MEI etc. I said VFR pattern CFI's. And note the words "generally speaking'" meaning not 100%



see my response above



thank you for validating my point that not all CFI's are double I's or MEI. And those that aren't usually stay inside when IFR.



Again, see my original response. Silly me to assume a CFI would know the difference between a CFII and MEI etc. Man y'all are sensitive today
Granted, you did say CFI, but I think we can argue that by the time most instructors get to the airlines, they / we have instrument and multi engine privileges.
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:44 PM
  #226  
zildjian_zach's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Forever commuting
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
Granted, you did say CFI, but I think we can argue that by the time most instructors get to the airlines, they / we have instrument and multi engine privileges.
Not to mention that any instructor worth his salt has no qualms about flying in clouds with a student. What better way to demonstrate to a private pilot student VOR/NDB tracking and intercepting, spatial disorientation, situational awareness, etc..? But I suppose a lot of CFI's are content taking the day off... and then going on the internet and complaining how long it's taking them to get 1500hrs.
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:47 PM
  #227  
Senior Skipper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: the correct seat
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
The other poster mentioned 2500 total and 500 ME - no credit for military.
I wouldn't agree with that. Fighter/Attack guys can make fine airline pilots and many will finish a CAREER with less time than that, and most would never come close to that if they only stayed in for their initial 10 year commitment. Plus the single engine types wouldn't hve a prayer at the 500 ME obviously. You would be cutting out a portion of a highly skilled pilot group who have proven their worth over time in the industry.
I would agree with the 1500 hour minimum though with no credit given to any special group.

USMCFLYR
I agree with scoop who said the military thing is a solution looking for a problem. I'm pretty sure that in 10 years of flying, you can probably manage to average 150hrs/yr. I wouldn't worry about the multi engine thing. I'm not convinced that the 100hr multi time actually makes a difference when you sit in a transport category plane.
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 04:53 PM
  #228  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Can I ask if you know the inner workings of an ILS or Rho Theta system?
Do you fly those approaches fairly well without knowing about the ins and outs of those systems?
There is education, and then there is penny knowledge.

USMCFLYR
And this why we are all writing in USMCFLYR this November!
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 05:04 PM
  #229  
Joachim's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 784
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Can I ask if you know the inner workings of an ILS or Rho Theta system?
Do you fly those approaches fairly well without knowing about the ins and outs of those systems?
There is education, and then there is penny knowledge.

USMCFLYR
I agree, but general understanding of the jetstream hardly qualifies as penny knowledge.

What would you like to know about the ILS or Rho Theta system? Electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics or nutsy-boltsy stuff? Lobing? Obviously, this is not 4 year degree stuff. We are moving beyond that. Aviation College isn't my only background We can get into real useless stuff such as bipolar junction transistors, Inertial Laser Ring Gyros and all kinds of other gee-whiz stuff.

The above isn't really relevant anymore, but syllabi often seem to lag behind abit. My instrucors were (very old) RAF guys with a syllabus written by even older RAF guys. Calculating convergency angles, celestial nav, critical fraction lenths, and learning about alloy composition characteristics and at what color they burn was the order of the day. Some of it completely useless, but some of it not so completely useless.

I maintain that a tailored academic aviation program, relevant to the modern world combined with real world experience is the best compromise, not just an hour requirement with some basic skillsets.

Last edited by Joachim; 04-26-2012 at 05:45 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old 04-26-2012 | 05:04 PM
  #230  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
I agree with scoop who said the military thing is a solution looking for a problem. I'm pretty sure that in 10 years of flying, you can probably manage to average 150hrs/yr. I wouldn't worry about the multi engine thing. I'm not convinced that the 100hr multi time actually makes a difference when you sit in a transport category plane.
Nope - not always.
You are also forgetting in that 10 year you have excellent opportunities to *grow* as a professional officer by doing Individual Augments for up to 18 months, attending one of the higher venues of education the military offers, joining a backpack humping infantry Battalion or many other out of the cockpit broadening experiences for about a year. My absolute highest year EVER in the military was 372 hours where I was an absolute 'person of ill-repute' and would even grab the -3 of a night time formation flight (some on here will understand the ludicrously of that ) for the hours. I also went over 2 years when I did not even make my minimums of 100 hours a year when I was assigned to flight positions!

In the end, what I was saying was that I think 2500 total/500 ME was too much and that I agree with others who state 1500 min - no waiver. Now if the law gets changed and raises the ATP mins to 2500 then I guess guys who want to eventually be airline pilots would have another set of circumstances to consider when they fill out that dream sheet nearing selection time Maybe there should be another license for those who want to do other types of flying than airline pilot. There are already different sets of minimums in place, insurance, and contracts all play a role in setting the bar.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z_Pilot
Aviation Law
9
10-17-2014 07:25 PM
Tanker-driver
Military
59
04-29-2014 07:41 PM
jdr7225
Flight Schools and Training
22
09-13-2011 08:29 AM
AirbornPegasus
Flight Schools and Training
9
01-04-2011 09:22 AM
Z_Pilot
Foreign
15
11-28-2010 03:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices