Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
What's the deal-e-o with RAH Ejet training? >

What's the deal-e-o with RAH Ejet training?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What's the deal-e-o with RAH Ejet training?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2013 | 06:24 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

[QUOTE=PilotJ3;1419642]

They didn't screw you out of a PIC type. They saved more FO's from busting their ride who already have an ATP since the type would be a more difficult ride vs a regular PC.[/QUOTE

Like if would be so much different of a regular PC!!! The only thing is that there's no retraining. Didn't you said before that to be a E-170 pilot you really have to step up your game?!?!?!?!?
It actually is, you would be surprised how many FO's are busting the ATP ride. I'm not even talking about new hires but FO's who have been on the plane for at least a year or more. I would estimate about 35% of FO's just haven't prepared for the ride well or only prepared as if it was a normal PC and failed. And yes, I've seen countless ex 145 or CRJ200 pilots who just couldn't step up and bring their A game. Sometimes it's just the inability to adapt to the fact that the engines are under the wings and farther apart which increases differential thrust, requiring more rudder on single engine approaches and V1 cuts compared to the 145 or 200.
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 06:37 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Karma;1419754]
Originally Posted by PilotJ3

It actually is, you would be surprised how many FO's are busting the ATP ride. I'm not even talking about new hires but FO's who have been on the plane for at least a year or more. I would estimate about 35% of FO's just haven't prepared for the ride well or only prepared as if it was a normal PC and failed. And yes, I've seen countless ex 145 or CRJ200 pilots who just couldn't step up and bring their A game. Sometimes it's just the inability to adapt to the fact that the engines are under the wings and farther apart which increases differential thrust, requiring more rudder on single engine approaches and V1 cuts compared to the 145 or 200.
got 145 and 170 types...
i still think 170 is far easier on the v1 cuts than 145, at least in the sim
no problems with jet classes getting filled, it's the q they cant staff as new hires realize they'll be on reserve for years...the music has stopped on that fleet with no more planes coming
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 06:43 AM
  #33  
Farmlover's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Default

That transitional jet must be so hard... Wish I was good enough
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 07:25 AM
  #34  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

Originally Posted by Karma
Sometimes it's just the inability to adapt to the fact that the engines are under the wings and farther apart which increases differential thrust, requiring more rudder on single engine approaches and V1 cuts compared to the 145 or 200.
Isn't that why airplanes with engines under the wings have comparatively massive tails and rudders? With hydraulic flight controls it seems like it ought to be a wash. Are AA and DAL pilots having trouble when they transition from the MD80 (or the "Super" 80) to the 737? Granted, I've never flown a 170 so maybe there really is something extra challenging about it, but I doubt it. For that matter, SkyWest puts new hires in the Brasilia, and if you want to talk differential thrust...
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 07:41 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Surprise
Isn't that why airplanes with engines under the wings have comparatively massive tails and rudders? With hydraulic flight controls it seems like it ought to be a wash. Are AA and DAL pilots having trouble when they transition from the MD80 (or the "Super" 80) to the 737? Granted, I've never flown a 170 so maybe there really is something extra challenging about it, but I doubt it. For that matter, SkyWest puts new hires in the Brasilia, and if you want to talk differential thrust...
It actually has nothing to do with that...The person who suggested this is one of those types that knows so much that isn't so...
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 07:50 AM
  #36  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

That's what I suspected.
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 08:14 AM
  #37  
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Karma;1419754]
Originally Posted by PilotJ3

It actually is, you would be surprised how many FO's are busting the ATP ride. I'm not even talking about new hires but FO's who have been on the plane for at least a year or more. I would estimate about 35% of FO's just haven't prepared for the ride well or only prepared as if it was a normal PC and failed. And yes, I've seen countless ex 145 or CRJ200 pilots who just couldn't step up and bring their A game. Sometimes it's just the inability to adapt to the fact that the engines are under the wings and farther apart which increases differential thrust, requiring more rudder on single engine approaches and V1 cuts compared to the 145 or 200.
Karma yur way off point. Im sure guys bust but to deny the atp guys a type ride is a little rediculous- you afraid of a type ride or are u a ca?
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 08:44 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Default

I think Karma has officially gone troll.
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 09:30 AM
  #39  
Ultralight's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=showmethemoney;1419761]
Originally Posted by Karma

it's the q they cant staff as new hires realize they'll be on reserve for years...the music has stopped on that fleet with no more planes coming
Wait, the old people come to Tucson in the winter, then head up to Colorado for the summer. Are you telling me those new Q400's are going to sit idle in the Arizona sun over the summer instead of going north with the snowbirds?

Even old people are smarter than airline management!
Reply
Old 06-01-2013 | 10:44 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Default

Gotta love these ads on APC. What an F'ing joke!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
iceman49
Hangar Talk
23
05-12-2011 10:35 AM
WhizWheel
Regional
6
09-07-2008 08:19 AM
aircraftdriver
Compass Airlines
168
07-03-2008 07:12 PM
MaydayMark
Cargo
8
08-30-2007 06:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices