Who offers the best Flow.
#101
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
It "was" to be in writing ?
Ahh, could you post that here to prove it ?
Specifically, the contractual agreement that should staffing become critically low, that management will reduce the number of operational aircraft to ensure the AA flow-thru continues at the contractually required minimal rate regardless of the consequences to the Envoy or AA operations. Besides, even if it did exist, any number of options are available to circumnavigate that. In the past, the CBA stated the company would "aggressively seek new flying opportunities......", but that was a joke and has since outsourced to other carriers consistently. Letter 3 was a landmark example of management B.S. and how about scope transfer rights to your own aircraft ?
*POOF*
Gone like a fart in the wind.
Please. Anyone banking a single promise from this management is truly living on hope and prayers.
Ahh, could you post that here to prove it ?
Specifically, the contractual agreement that should staffing become critically low, that management will reduce the number of operational aircraft to ensure the AA flow-thru continues at the contractually required minimal rate regardless of the consequences to the Envoy or AA operations. Besides, even if it did exist, any number of options are available to circumnavigate that. In the past, the CBA stated the company would "aggressively seek new flying opportunities......", but that was a joke and has since outsourced to other carriers consistently. Letter 3 was a landmark example of management B.S. and how about scope transfer rights to your own aircraft ?
*POOF*
Gone like a fart in the wind.
Please. Anyone banking a single promise from this management is truly living on hope and prayers.
#103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Reverse Cowgirl
It "was" to be in writing ?
Ahh, could you post that here to prove it ?
Specifically, the contractual agreement that should staffing become critically low, that management will reduce the number of operational aircraft to ensure the AA flow-thru continues at the contractually required minimal rate regardless of the consequences to the Envoy or AA operations. Besides, even if it did exist, any number of options are available to circumnavigate that. In the past, the CBA stated the company would "aggressively seek new flying opportunities......", but that was a joke and has since outsourced to other carriers consistently. Letter 3 was a landmark example of management B.S. and how about scope transfer rights to your own aircraft ?
*POOF*
Gone like a fart in the wind.
Please. Anyone banking a single promise from this management is truly living on hope and prayers.
Ahh, could you post that here to prove it ?
Specifically, the contractual agreement that should staffing become critically low, that management will reduce the number of operational aircraft to ensure the AA flow-thru continues at the contractually required minimal rate regardless of the consequences to the Envoy or AA operations. Besides, even if it did exist, any number of options are available to circumnavigate that. In the past, the CBA stated the company would "aggressively seek new flying opportunities......", but that was a joke and has since outsourced to other carriers consistently. Letter 3 was a landmark example of management B.S. and how about scope transfer rights to your own aircraft ?
*POOF*
Gone like a fart in the wind.
Please. Anyone banking a single promise from this management is truly living on hope and prayers.
If you have access it is still there from March 2014.
#104
Clearly, you're out of touch. The "honeymoon" between AA pilots and Parker is ALREADY over, "dude". As for the rest of your drivel, that card has been played on me before and by much better players then you. I always know when someone else has no valid arguments left, as they always play the "you couldn't get hired anywhere else card" on me. It used to be the "Eagle lifer-loser" card, but that's no longer applicable. That tack is a demonstration of pathetic weakness, not unlike YOU voting for successive rounds of concessions from a corporation raking in Billions this year and into the future.
As for scope, well kid, on that you're out of luck this go-around. It's not in consideration. Considering the fact that the regional segment of the industry is hopelessly doomed to shrink by at least half in the next 5 years, Parker has all the scope he can use, but hey, if scope should be relaxed in the future, YOU will be the loser there as it only extends your tenure in an RJ.
I can live with that.
But, getting back to the subject of pathetic weakness......
....someone who voted not once, but TWICE for successive concessions from a company raking in billions upon billions is in NO position to criticize others for voting in contracts in the past that were and shockingly still ARE heads and tails FAR better then the garbage you eagerly are willing to work under even when factored in for inflation. The 16 year contract at Eagle turned out to be one of the better deals and provided me with annual pay of $125K/year and much better schedule flexibility then the used toilet paper that's now your agreement.
Some of you kids crack me up.....it's always someone ELE'S fault, you're now in the toilet with a future that's more likely to result in a flushing as opposed to application of bowl freshener. Yes, blame the old Eagle pilots, blame PSA, blame RAH , blame Pinnacle, etc. It's never your fault. What a joke. Clearly as well, you are aware of supposed past mistakes, yet you repeat them which is my whole entire point !
Thanks for the yuk ! This for me has been the most laughable post I've seen on this forum in years. You've truly made my day !
As for scope, well kid, on that you're out of luck this go-around. It's not in consideration. Considering the fact that the regional segment of the industry is hopelessly doomed to shrink by at least half in the next 5 years, Parker has all the scope he can use, but hey, if scope should be relaxed in the future, YOU will be the loser there as it only extends your tenure in an RJ.
I can live with that.
But, getting back to the subject of pathetic weakness......
....someone who voted not once, but TWICE for successive concessions from a company raking in billions upon billions is in NO position to criticize others for voting in contracts in the past that were and shockingly still ARE heads and tails FAR better then the garbage you eagerly are willing to work under even when factored in for inflation. The 16 year contract at Eagle turned out to be one of the better deals and provided me with annual pay of $125K/year and much better schedule flexibility then the used toilet paper that's now your agreement.
Some of you kids crack me up.....it's always someone ELE'S fault, you're now in the toilet with a future that's more likely to result in a flushing as opposed to application of bowl freshener. Yes, blame the old Eagle pilots, blame PSA, blame RAH , blame Pinnacle, etc. It's never your fault. What a joke. Clearly as well, you are aware of supposed past mistakes, yet you repeat them which is my whole entire point !
Thanks for the yuk ! This for me has been the most laughable post I've seen on this forum in years. You've truly made my day !


Keep dreaming man...the flow was good for you but not for everybody else. Hey, I voted yes now...I voted no in bk and in March.
It's time to think for ourselves, you hate so much eagle that I believe you would be happy if they close the airline. AA is becoming the biggest LLC of the world...it's not the same place it used to be and it never will.
Like I said before, the flow should be the plan Z for anyone, the plan A should be get hire anywhere before flow. But hey that's ok... Don't come to envoy people, go to PSA, MESA, RAH, Compass, any place that will take you away from Envoy.
#105
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
BTW......you're flowing to AA soon ? Well, welcome aboard. Of course, you do realize that according to J3, you're now also a loser who obviously "couldn't get hired anywhere else" too, yes ?
In fact, if J3 flows to AA then he too joins the loser club he's classified me into and soon you. Talk about a guy who has no idea of the things he talks about, yet his industry crystal ball is so shiny !
Kinda like the E-175 he sold his soul for, eh ?
#108
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Thanks son.....and I'm a nice guy to pull gear for too. 
You voted like that ?
Sure you did.
I don't hate Eagle, I'm just trying to paint a more realistic future based on the FACTS of the past and not fantasies of some of the present greenhorns.
Time to think for yourself, eh ?
Interesting. Suppose you flow over in 3-4-5 years (I'm not sure of the exact date in your fantasy) and as a very junior AA pilot in the typical bottom 15% nail-biting "furlough fodder" zone something unforeseen occurs and you are either subject to furlough or caught in a stagnation cycle and the majority senior also still being "pops" like me vote on things that won't prevent your furlough, like concessions ?
Hint : AA pilots have always eaten their young and the older they get, the less likely they will be to sacrifice their paychecks and pocket books to keep you employed.
As a pilot who clearly possesses a magna cum laude concessionist attitude like you, you'll not blame those more senior at AA (AKA the majority) for then also "thinking for themselves", will you ?
Of course you will. Why ?
Because you flip your logic like the wind when it suits your interests, have no interest in the past or mistakes made and well,.......like most of the present generation who demand instant gratification, "it's all about me".
Good luck kid. But you sound exactly like the rest of us when we were young, self-absorbed and full of pi$$ and vinegar and history has sooner or later always repeated itself in this profession and guess what ?
Just about the time you DO flow (whenever that is), if the cyclical nature of this profession hasn't proved itself once again, it is destined to do so soon.
Yes, ANY "flow thru" should be your back-up, because like it or not, there won't be enough mainline pilots slots for every hopeful that want them, even with the retirement schedule at least for 15 years. The point I'm trying to make is that any present regional pilots shouldn't flush there present seniority at regional X to come to Envoy for its flow-thru. That's the riskiest move they could make right now. At the very least, they should wait 12 months or so to see how things shake out and I think if they do, they'll breathe a sigh of relief they didn't allow themselves to be suckered into a knee-jerk reaction.
I find it humorous though that you babble about me supposedly "hating" Eagle, when clearly you hate the other regionals that you feel are responsible for your present situation. I can see why then it would be desirable to try and shaft them by strangling their recruiting. Clearly, there is a reason for your bias in favor of Envoy and its to inflict damage upon those you feel have done you wrong. My position on the other hand isn't based on an agenda or emotion, but simple practical reality based on the past and even more importantly the PRESENT conduct of your management who arguably has been the worst of the lot when it comes to fair treatment and honoring promises.
Hey, Parker's lied to us too and if he's willing to do that to us at AA, I can only imagine what his plans are for Envoy and putting the success of a shrinking regionals flow-thru, I assure you is NOT among his priorities.
But, if you must go ostrich, that's up to you.

Sure you did.

Time to think for yourself, eh ?
Interesting. Suppose you flow over in 3-4-5 years (I'm not sure of the exact date in your fantasy) and as a very junior AA pilot in the typical bottom 15% nail-biting "furlough fodder" zone something unforeseen occurs and you are either subject to furlough or caught in a stagnation cycle and the majority senior also still being "pops" like me vote on things that won't prevent your furlough, like concessions ?
Hint : AA pilots have always eaten their young and the older they get, the less likely they will be to sacrifice their paychecks and pocket books to keep you employed.
As a pilot who clearly possesses a magna cum laude concessionist attitude like you, you'll not blame those more senior at AA (AKA the majority) for then also "thinking for themselves", will you ?
Of course you will. Why ?
Because you flip your logic like the wind when it suits your interests, have no interest in the past or mistakes made and well,.......like most of the present generation who demand instant gratification, "it's all about me".
Good luck kid. But you sound exactly like the rest of us when we were young, self-absorbed and full of pi$$ and vinegar and history has sooner or later always repeated itself in this profession and guess what ?
Just about the time you DO flow (whenever that is), if the cyclical nature of this profession hasn't proved itself once again, it is destined to do so soon.
I find it humorous though that you babble about me supposedly "hating" Eagle, when clearly you hate the other regionals that you feel are responsible for your present situation. I can see why then it would be desirable to try and shaft them by strangling their recruiting. Clearly, there is a reason for your bias in favor of Envoy and its to inflict damage upon those you feel have done you wrong. My position on the other hand isn't based on an agenda or emotion, but simple practical reality based on the past and even more importantly the PRESENT conduct of your management who arguably has been the worst of the lot when it comes to fair treatment and honoring promises.
Hey, Parker's lied to us too and if he's willing to do that to us at AA, I can only imagine what his plans are for Envoy and putting the success of a shrinking regionals flow-thru, I assure you is NOT among his priorities.
But, if you must go ostrich, that's up to you.
Last edited by eaglefly; 12-29-2014 at 07:19 AM.
#109
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Actually, we have about 15,000 pilots now. Hey, if a pilot jumps to Envoy now or goes there from scratch, they just might be at AA in 10 years. Not enough reason to jump or even target Envoy AFAIC. Delta and UAL will have to match AA's flow promises soon and they will.
#110
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
They cant even staff the fresh new ones coming from the factory without raiding their other operations ?
They're robbing peter to pay paul and that's on a fairly small scale now. The best threats they could make to you were nickel-an-dime transfers of aircraft elsewhere, like 15 or 20 to regional X. In fact, I'm told now that the transfer of the 47 CRJ's will have to be delayed because the regional slated for them can't staff them at the rate AAG would like to transfer them.
Note : The transfer of the CRJ's was a future fleet commonality situation and would have occurred regardless of the contractual situation at Envoy, but still they cannot transfer them as desired.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



