Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2015, 03:51 PM
  #1421  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime View Post
Seabury has been a partner with RAH management for some time now, the company released information regarding their presence in order to scare the entire employee group (not just the pilots) in an effort to get votes.

The FO shuffle is not over. If RAH signs a deal with its pilots that raises FO pay by this magnitude it will all but stop new hires from going to the sweat shops like Mesa, which will in turn stop the quick upgrades. No new aircraft have been announced there and the flow of planes to PSA is slowing dramatically. Also, the 145's have yet to show up at PDT. There are pleanty of carriers whose pilots will jump at a higher FO rate. Not to mention the fact that RAH has over 60 aircraft showing up on property for which it can't currently staff. The upgrade party will be huge.

RAH just recently broke ground on a training facility in IND that is nearly 3 times the size of its current space. They paid down 90 million in early debt payments and still have 40-80 c-series aircraft on order. They are testing the waters with this LBFO to see what they can get away with, but they have major plans in store. That is why this vote (if it comes to that) is so important.

The reductions in flying have been temporary so far, the codeshare partners are watching very carefully to see what the next move will be.
You are either a troll, or mentally retarded...
This industry has been run thru by every union busting method known. FINALLY the whipsaw is thru and the shoe is on the other foot. And all u can propose is accepting a LBFO which is really where we should start from. This is a game. When fuel prices go up do u hear how the company has to park aircraft? For the life of me I don't understand why pilots flying a 76 seat plane, on mainline routes, feel they need to accept ANY offer from a company, that is run by a mega company, that is essentially printing money, that is anything less than mainline pay. And while we're at it, adjusted for inflation on the mainline level. Too long have theese corporate entities made millions off the backs of their employees only to file for bankruptcy and get a second chance. **** them. This is the situation they have created. If they wish for the gravy train to roll, they will pay us every dime of what we are reasonably asking for, or they can suck a fat dick. Which is to say maybe bend an inch to what a free market is demanding.

Last edited by hungryCFI; 08-23-2015 at 04:02 PM.
hungryCFI is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 03:53 PM
  #1422  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime View Post
Seabury has been a partner with RAH management for some time now, the company released information regarding their presence in order to scare the entire employee group (not just the pilots) in an effort to get votes.

The FO shuffle is not over. If RAH signs a deal with its pilots that raises FO pay by this magnitude it will all but stop new hires from going to the sweat shops like Mesa, which will in turn stop the quick upgrades. No new aircraft have been announced there and the flow of planes to PSA is slowing dramatically. Also, the 145's have yet to show up at PDT. There are pleanty of carriers whose pilots will jump at a higher FO rate. Not to mention the fact that RAH has over 60 aircraft showing up on property for which it can't currently staff. The upgrade party will be huge.

RAH just recently broke ground on a training facility in IND that is nearly 3 times the size of its current space. They paid down 90 million in early debt payments and still have 40-80 c-series aircraft on order. They are testing the waters with this LBFO to see what they can get away with, but they have major plans in store. That is why this vote (if it comes to that) is so important.

The reductions in flying have been temporary so far, the codeshare partners are watching very carefully to see what the next move will be.
Wow, you have really been fooled. There is no future for most regionals, including RAH.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 04:47 PM
  #1423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by hungryCFI View Post
You are either a troll, or mentally retarded...
This industry has been run thru by every union busting method known. FINALLY the whipsaw is thru and the shoe is on the other foot. And all u can propose is accepting a LBFO which is really where we should start from. This is a game. When fuel prices go up do u hear how the company has to park aircraft? For the life of me I don't understand why pilots flying a 76 seat plane, on mainline routes, feel they need to accept ANY offer from a company, that is run by a mega company, that is essentially printing money, that is anything less than mainline pay. And while we're at it, adjusted for inflation on the mainline level. Too long have theese corporate entities made millions off the backs of their employees only to file for bankruptcy and get a second chance. **** them. This is the situation they have created. If they wish for the gravy train to roll, they will pay us every dime of what we are reasonably asking for, or they can suck a fat dick. Which is to say maybe bend an inch to what a free market is demanding.
Read my last post, I'm a no voter. Any proposal not presented to me in the form of a TA by my NC is an automatic no. However, it is advantageous to see the other side of the coin, and history shows what I have said is true. As long as there are regionals, the whipsaw will continue. If you believe anything else, you are not educated on this industries history.
TurbineTime is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 04:52 PM
  #1424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
Wow, you have really been fooled. There is no future for most regionals, including RAH.
For once you and I will agree, there is no long term future. But RAH will be one of the last holdouts. They have the money, the assets and the contract diversity with codeshares to beat out many of the others. They even included crj-200 throug 900 pay in their proposal as a hint towards their future plans. We don't operate those aircraft, who are we looking at buying. Hate RAH all you want, facts don't lie. RAH will be one of the last out of this garbage game.
TurbineTime is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 04:55 PM
  #1425  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime View Post
For once you and I will agree, there is no long term future. But RAH will be one of the last holdouts. They have the money, the assets and the contract diversity with codeshares to beat out many of the others. They even included crj-200 throug 900 pay in their proposal as a hint towards their future plans. We don't operate those aircraft, who are we looking at buying. Hate RAH all you want, facts don't lie. RAH will be one of the last out of this garbage game.
They don't have a lot of assets. There is a lot of debt on the books. When your "assets" aren't producing the cash flow to cover ownership costs that makes you insolvent. One thing is certain - RAH is still a powerhouse.
DMEarc is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 05:06 PM
  #1426  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime View Post
For once you and I will agree, there is no long term future. But RAH will be one of the last holdouts. They have the money, the assets and the contract diversity with codeshares to beat out many of the others. They even included crj-200 throug 900 pay in their proposal as a hint towards their future plans. We don't operate those aircraft, who are we looking at buying. Hate RAH all you want, facts don't lie. RAH will be one of the last out of this garbage game.
The wholly owneds will be the last, not rah. Rah will shrink first then possibly be bought out at a largely shrunken size. Or go out altogether. Maybe rah will become their own airline as an alternative.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 05:26 PM
  #1427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
The wholly owneds will be the last, not rah. Rah will shrink first then possibly be bought out at a largely shrunken size. Or go out altogether. Maybe rah will become their own airline as an alternative.
I just can't agree. The wholly owned airlines are part of a company that represents only a third of RAH's business. Having a large private contractor like RAH or skywest on the payroll is a huge bonus to the codeshare partners due to the leverage they can use against their own wholly owned carriers. I agree the smaller private airlines will fold, but the big two with the most modern aircraft on property will be the survivors. I'm not saying it is a favorable outcome, but it is the one that will happen in my opinion.
TurbineTime is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 05:32 PM
  #1428  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by DMEarc View Post
They don't have a lot of assets. There is a lot of debt on the books. When your "assets" aren't producing the cash flow to cover ownership costs that makes you insolvent. One thing is certain - RAH is still a powerhouse.
RAH has been paying off debt at an incredible rate They own outright the largest fleet of ejets, which are proving to be the desired fleet type for the next decade and beyond. They support an increasingly large percentage of operations for all three major carriers, lift that cannot be automatically transferred to another FFD carrier. Although the future at RAH is uncertain, I think it is disingenuous to say they don't have many assets. They have more than any other regional, because they own the aircraft.
TurbineTime is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 05:38 PM
  #1429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime View Post
I just can't agree. The wholly owned airlines are part of a company that represents only a third of RAH's business. .
why do you think AAG is beefing up PDT/PSA and ENY??? They want each at about 150 aircraft.
billyho is offline  
Old 08-23-2015, 05:53 PM
  #1430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
why do you think AAG is beefing up PDT/PSA and ENY??? They want each at about 150 aircraft.
So they can manipulate one of the three against the other two to keep things cheap and keep the pilots in line. The same tactic they've already used will work again...
TurbineTime is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices