Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2019, 04:51 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by ockham View Post
There are far to many aerodynamic bandaids that are permitted to pass the current standards. Not just this particular airplane, but a whole bunch of airframes. If the basic aerodynamics won't pass without the pushers, pullers and now AOA induced changes to primary and secondary controls then a new design of the wing platform should come into play.

Just my .02

Economics, politics, competition, and customers are the driving force in aircraft development, design, and rebranding... and in some cases, with compromise, overuling safety.
captjns is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 05:00 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
I have tried to avoid our MAXs when commuting but for the first time I've just now purposely booked around the MAX. My wife has a full fare ticket she is booking and we are picking flights that avoid it as well.

I know it's early but why take a chance?
Seriously? Do you avoid walking down stairs? Getting in a car? You're also more likely to choke on food so you better not eat.
ORDinary is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 05:48 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by ORDinary View Post
Seriously? Do you avoid walking down stairs? Getting in a car? You're also more likely to choke on food so you better not eat.
The traveling public is thinking the same thing about the Max. Just like the rudder hard overs and reversals of the past - there’s a serious problem here. When a government decides to ground the fleet, I don’t think someone choosing to avoid the airframe is at all unreasonable.
pangolin is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 05:53 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by costalpilot View Post
well ............yeah.

burgers dont have V speeds.?????? confused ???

as for showering...my shower is safer than any old airplane. I dont know about yours.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...anger-of-death
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:03 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
The traveling public is thinking the same thing about the Max. Just like the rudder hard overs and reversals of the past - there’s a serious problem here. When a government decides to ground the fleet, I don’t think someone choosing to avoid the airframe is at all unreasonable.
I understand the flying public feels that way. But you are much, much more likely to die in a car or on stairs. I would think a pilot would apply this logic better than the flying general public.
ORDinary is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:10 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by ORDinary View Post
I understand the flying public feels that way. But you are much, much more likely to die in a car or on stairs. I would think a pilot would apply this logic better than the flying general public.
Given an equal choice - 737 Max vs 737 - 800 which door would you walk through? We are not talking Max vs Motorcycle here.
pangolin is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:17 AM
  #87  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Best post on the subject. Uncommanded or runaway trim is the problem. The solution is simple. It does not matter in the least what generated the uncommanded trim.
Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
A friend of an acquaintance flies 777s for Ethiopian and was next in line for departure after the accident aircraft. According to him the accident aircraft crew reported they had unreliable airspeed to the tower before being switched over to the departure frequency. Don't know how that might play into the MCAS playing a role.
Originally Posted by Peacock View Post
With bad AOA indications, could it be triggering a stall warning (and MCAS) while showing accurate airspeed, which leads the crew to believe the airspeed was unreliable?
The problem may be, at least for Lion Air, that there was more than one thing going on, and a stall warning might be a big distraction that might cause one to miss the runaway trim initially. Or assume the other guy is doing it to recover from whatever else is going on. If the FO really only had 200 hours, that was single pilot ops as soon as they got off the sim script.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:21 AM
  #88  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 20
Default

China, Indonesia, Ehtiopia and Cayman grounding their MAX fleet UFN. Boeing stock has not surprisingly plummeted this morning. 2 Max's and 1 767 down since October. Boeing lawyers won't be getting any sleep in the coming weeks.
jetprop420 is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:22 AM
  #89  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Given an equal choice - 737 Max vs 737 - 800 which door would you walk through? We are not talking Max vs Motorcycle here.
In the US, I wouldn't care. I think most scheduled airline pilots in the US who are operating a MAX could deal with this (Lionair scenario). A US regional noob on day one of IOE has at least 1500 hours. The CA on a US MAX is going to be a lot closer to, or above, 10K hours than to zero hours.

But in other parts of the world you can fly a transport jet with a few or a couple hundred hours. But US pax, and most US politicians, don't understand that distinction.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 06:26 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iHateAMR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: FO
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
The traveling public is thinking the same thing about the Max. Just like the rudder hard overs and reversals of the past - there’s a serious problem here. When a government decides to ground the fleet, I don’t think someone choosing to avoid the airframe is at all unreasonable.
My wife wanted me to make sure she wasn’t booked on a Max on her SWA flight later this week. Other than me, she has no ties to aviation, so she is basically the traveling public.
iHateAMR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices