Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:22 PM
  #681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
We may safely assume reporters are trying to get some factual information here. We may also assume they have noted our disdain for the reporting so far.

Help them if you can but keep OPSEC in mind and BEADWINDOW.
I like it, Jungle. That's right up there with "AF's water desalinate facility is inop".
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:26 PM
  #682  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

GF:
Thanks for the clarification on when they began looking. I had gotten the impression it was much, much later - not when the first handoff was missed or soon thereafter.
I also didn't understand that the ACARS system transmitted info about waypoints or waypoint changes. That makes sense and explains why some things are reported as being assured, I guess.

Regarding the transponder being off... if it isn't normally turned off, then I guess that, coupled with a reported change in waypoints sways my personal opinion away from it being a mechanical emergency.

I hope enough facts are eventually discovered and disclosed to provide an answer as to what probably happened, and I still hope it ends up being that it was something "innocent," though that seems improbable.

TheDude:
I know you didn't mention me specifically, but just in case you do wonder about me - I'm not a reporter. My profession of 27 years is LEO, which definitely influences how I ask questions and how I process what's reported. Sorry if it "smells" fishy, but mine definitely isn't a reporter smell.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:36 PM
  #683  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Sorry to break the news to ya, JJ21, but the oil rig story is also bogus, he was 370 nautical miles and we'll beyond the horizon at the point the plane was supposed to be a fireball.

GF
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:42 PM
  #684  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mournlight
GF:
I also didn't understand that the ACARS system transmitted info about waypoints or waypoint changes. That makes sense and explains why some things are reported as being assured, I guess.
Looks like we are getting conflicting info, jungle seems to think it is speculation, and there is no way of knowing for certain. (see above) I also just asked an FMS design buddy of mine about this and he is not aware of this sort of ACARS messaging. Said he would to check on it. Speaking of reporters, just now a guy on the news that was being interviewed essentially said it was bunk that we know for certain the FMS was reprogrammed. Newscaster shut him down fast, (was ruining his whole news drama)
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:56 PM
  #685  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Mostly Economy
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I wonder if the pundits, anchors, "experts," and APC accident investigators will ever publicly apologize to the pilots' families if/when they are eventually found to be victims in this tragedy.
I'll never forget the Rodney King incidents in LA, the riots, loss of life and property, the way CNN handled the whole thing and was never held responsible for any of it - and that is but one incident among many. So no, of course not. But at least a precedent may have been established during the Travon Jackson/George Zimmerman case when NBC got sued for their blatant alteration of digital media. Hope they are proven innocent.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:58 PM
  #686  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Mostly Economy
Default

Originally Posted by Taped2Seat
I'll never forget the Rodney King incidents in LA, the riots, loss of life and property, the way CNN handled the whole thing and was never held responsible for any of it - and that is but one incident among many. So no, of course not. But at least a precedent may have been established during the Travon Jackson/George Zimmerman case when NBC got sued for their blatant alteration of digital media. Hope they are proven innocent.
Meant the pilots, not the media.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 07:05 PM
  #687  
Captain Bligh's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Does anyone screen new APC account applicants for credentials? For crying out loud! Some of these people are asking questions a private pilot should know. Clearly the AIM is a document that can be researched online. It's fine to lurk as a non-pilot, but the 3 page posts of nothing but elementary questions about SAR and other established procedures contribute nothing to the discussion.

Mods can anything be done here?
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 07:19 PM
  #688  
jungle's Avatar
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
Does anyone screen new APC account applicants for credentials? For crying out loud! Some of these people are asking questions a private pilot should know. Clearly the AIM is a document that can be researched online. It's fine to lurk as a non-pilot, but the 3 page posts of nothing but elementary questions about SAR and other established procedures contribute nothing to the discussion.

Mods can anything be done here?
Yes, people go to the well for water, help them out but be cautious.

We all know the MSM is negligent and lazy, it is easier for them to ask than buckle down and do actual work.

They are far more inclined to propagate lies than the truth, it is just the nature of things, always has been. Finding the truth is very hard work and speaking it is often dangerous.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 07:27 PM
  #689  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Fire Lieutenant
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think private pilots learn about this.

Medical O2 has water vapor (normal ambient humidity) so as not to dry out the patient's lungs and throat.

Aviation O2 is dry, so that it doesn't form ice in the delivery system when the regulator drops the pressure, and subsequently the temperature.
Medical O2 used in the prehospital environment is as dry as a bone. Moisture is only added for long term use in medical facilities.

Should have remembered that fact was in my private curriculum. It was a couple of decades ago. However, as I said earlier, I stand corrected on that point.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 07:57 PM
  #690  
savall's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: French American
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude
Not to mention the new members here that are trolling for info.
Reporter style.
Yea, seriously. I'm all for new thoughts and members, but I'm not trying to hear joe shmo's opinion because he took a few introductory courses last week. I'm quite well versed in the airplane, but I'm not trying to pretend I know what happened.

If seasoned pilots ATP/FI/MIL/etc, and the proper investigative authorities can't figure this out yet, I doubt some dude on google can.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices