Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2014, 04:52 PM
  #581  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by A306pilot View Post
Unitedflyier I found an EK one online.
You can build a fully functional 777 sim in your basement, UF doesn't think someone could find an emergency checklist or some schematics online? I guess he missed the memo about the age of the Internet, it started over ten years ago.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 05:01 PM
  #582  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UASIT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Default

Originally Posted by Taped2Seat View Post
The thought of a perp driving a plane with 237 (238?) dead bodies in the back for 5+ hours gives me the creeps - to me it changes the magnitude of the crime, if indeed there was one. I hope this is wrong for the sake of their relatives and everyone involved.
I been thinking that for a while...Just creepy to have that many dead bodies , at night, over the ocean...Waiting for the fuel to run out so you nose dive into the abyss...

What do you do? Smoke and have a few drinks...Maybe walk around whistling thru the cabin???
UASIT is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 05:24 PM
  #583  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by UASIT View Post
I been thinking that for a while...Just creepy to have that many dead bodies , at night, over the ocean...Waiting for the fuel to run out so you nose dive into the abyss...

What do you do? Smoke and have a few drinks...Maybe walk around whistling thru the cabin???

You'd go all nacraphiliac on the hot corpses, of course!
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 05:26 PM
  #584  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by Outsider View Post
So, I have a question.
The media is reporting that "authorities" have specific times that the Xpndr and ACARS were "turned off".
How the hell do the "authorities" know this?
My understanding is; they were not in radar contact at the time and unless ACARS was in the middle of a transmission, I don't know how they could know these times so specifically.
Am I missing something here?
Also if ACARS is off, what system is pinging the satellites?
I'm old but I don't get this.

Graybeard
I think the "authorities" are full of crap, and looking for a scapegoat.

They have crappy radar coverage, crappy security at the airport, and Air Malaysia probably does crappy mx on their airplanes.

It's really easy to blame the dead pilots, rather than admit you allowed hijackers with knives/bombs on board, or you didn't do any MX on your airplanes.
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:02 PM
  #585  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

You're all going to want to turn on CNN right this minute, Don Lemon is going to tell us the "Warning Signs that your pilot may be suicidal..."

Even I can't make this crap up, but CNN is pretty good at it!
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:04 PM
  #586  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Mostly Economy
Posts: 19
Default

There might be an off-shoot of the SIA68 theory. What if what the radar tracked was actually SIA68 and not MH370? Radar altitude readings potentially have large margin of errors. MH370 could've dropped off radar and gone right instead of left. Focus on the left hand while the right hand does something else.
Taped2Seat is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:07 PM
  #587  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,093
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
The pavement has to be thick enough to hold a widebody...big-airport runways are probably 6-10feet thick concrete.
Closer to ~16 inches.

There's obviously a softer base underneath that, but not really a requirement for a single landing and maybe a departure.

The ~16" thickness is so that the runway doesn't have to be replaced so often. You could go much much thinner for a one-time use.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:17 PM
  #588  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
I think the "authorities" are full of crap, and looking for a scapegoat.
The authorities and a bunch of idiots that call themselves pilots as well........!
The Dominican is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:23 PM
  #589  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

As silly as the SQ 68 theory is, the offshoot is, too. SQ would have been squawking on SSR so there would be NO confusion on him.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 06:28 PM
  #590  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Timbo,

An, I'll bet on any given day, 30% of all crews, regardless of flying machine, exhibit one or more of Lemon's warning signs in the pax minds. Following the posts here and at PPRUNE would drive you nuts.


GF

Last edited by galaxy flyer; 03-17-2014 at 06:48 PM.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices