Or AA flying 100% of South America that’s not Caribbean.

This goes way beyond a normal codeshare.

This is a joint venture.

No!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But we won’t furlough so there is that

yeah it’s has been and still is a no from me

Read through all the Briefing Notes.
I can't see voting Yes on this.
I really don't believe we get enough in return for what we are allowing the company to do. While it may be mutually beneficial to do so, it seems they want/need this a LOT more than us. 2% isn't worth it.
And I'm at less than 80% seniortiy FWIW.

100% of international flying cOULd?
go to AA

Did the negotiations go like this...?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt8DoNerIPY

How exactly does the, “we’re going to need every single 190 flying at max” (quote from the sys chief) come into play here? I’m missing the carrot apparently.

Let me get this right. Initially the Codeshare was limited to BOS, JFK, EWR and LGA, but now it suddenly turns into all of our network?

Ask yourself this

“Would they have been allowed to do this if we were growing”

Answer is no.

I kept hearing this was probably only going to be a give on something they would’ve been allowed to
Do anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where do you read that? I’m missing that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk