Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2015 | 04:49 PM
  #10271  
chazbird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Fifth floor, window
Default

So, when I am in indoc and I don't get SFO and I tell them, sorry, no can do, what goes on the PRIA? An insolent fire starting, upstart Rasputin, which will haunt and hold me back forever? Or what? Any ideas?

I am beginning to see the light though. Probably rather than award a base before the class, like they could, maybe they will stick with what they have. I fully understand the senior people wanting to change their domiciles and not getting in their way, but the slots after that are what I am talking about. They could rearrange that process and get more people into their classes. But if they aren't willing to be creative, all the while not stepping on more senior pilots, then maybe they are not so bright. I am in no way shocked, this sort of mentality (among other lapses) seems to have gotten them where they are as far as pilot staffing.
Old 04-24-2015 | 04:57 PM
  #10272  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 62
Default

As a prior 121 guy you should know better. What you're asking is the entire industry to change how it's always done things.
Old 04-24-2015 | 05:03 PM
  #10273  
chazbird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Fifth floor, window
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
As a prior 121 guy you should know better. What you're asking is the entire industry to change how it's always done things.
Which is one small component of why they are in their situation. My idea doesn't screw anyone over and provides a benefit to the company and a prospective new pilot, all the while not treading on seniority.

I am still interested in how the PRIA would play out as far as me walking out of indoc? I would so rather avoid screwing the company over by bailing and also avoid risking something on a PRIA document.
Old 04-24-2015 | 05:13 PM
  #10274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

They will torch your PRIA. Incomplete training. Good night sweet prince. Get in line like a man and deal with it you lazy punk.
Old 04-24-2015 | 05:32 PM
  #10275  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by skypilot35
You're asking me to prove a negative. Do you honestly believe Skywest Airlines would have gotten just as much if they were union? Before you say they would have gotten more, look at the union regionals (excluding XJT) and compare.



I wouldn't say we are not willing to try. I am willing to bet within the next 2 years Skywest will vote in a union. MY OPINION. QOL is decreasing for everyone on the seniority list, not just the guys on reserve. It's not a money issue and the company seems intransigent on the work rules. We need a stronger negotiating tool, but the reluctance is because of what I've outlined above.
[/COLOR]


Exactly.

On another note, the offer we currently have from management is not concessionary (on the face of it), but it's ridiculous all the same. The fact that UAL just posted a $582+ million dollar profit is one of many reasons people call 1.00 /.50 a slap in the face.

Nevets, you figure out how to get the entire regional pilot group on one list and under one MEC, I'm in. I'll volunteer to help. Otherwise, a regional union is ineffective. Lowest bidder wins and there is always gonna be a lower bidding...race to the bottom competitor....that's capitalism.

Look, there are ups and downs in the airline industry. Both at mainline and at regionals. When the tide was rising Comair got a really good contract, then it was ACA, then xjt, then air Wisconsin, then xjt again, then horizon. At that point the tide turned. Skywest CERTAINLY would've been up there with their hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. Skywest has been the most profitable regional in history, more so than any of the other ones I just mentioned that each raised the bar when it was their turn. If you don't think that Skywest pilots would've ever gotten a contract that was at least comparable to the top contract, then I don't know what to tell you. And now, almost every single regional is increasing their pilot cost by offering better and better compensation packages. Yet many of them are not even close to the profitability that Skywest currently has. I'm not saying that pilot unions are all powerful at all. Many of them have weak pilots in their MECs leading them. And dispute that, some of them are making gains. Now is the time to use some of that leverage to get up there in the top tier. If you don't think that you can do that with a pilot union at Skywest, then you are saying your pilots are not good enough to achieve it. I personally think they can if they were union. And that would help all the rest of us.

Anyway, of course it would be ideal if there was a single seniority list and one regional pilot Union. But the perfect shouldn't get in the way of the "better than what we have now." It honestly sounds like a convenient excuse to not be for a pilot union. I think it's a cop out since it'll almost certainly ever happen.
Old 04-24-2015 | 05:36 PM
  #10276  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by chazbird
So, when I am in indoc and I don't get SFO and I tell them, sorry, no can do, what goes on the PRIA? An insolent fire starting, upstart Rasputin, which will haunt and hold me back forever? Or what? Any ideas?

I am beginning to see the light though. Probably rather than award a base before the class, like they could, maybe they will stick with what they have. I fully understand the senior people wanting to change their domiciles and not getting in their way, but the slots after that are what I am talking about. They could rearrange that process and get more people into their classes. But if they aren't willing to be creative, all the while not stepping on more senior pilots, then maybe they are not so bright. I am in no way shocked, this sort of mentality (among other lapses) seems to have gotten them where they are as far as pilot staffing.

Only training failures go on your pria, not incomplete. But it is in bad form to quit without giving at least two weeks notice. And it may be a requirement to not get a "would not rehire" check box marked. In fact, they would probably check that box regardless. Not a big deal until your next airline request your employment information. And probably still not a big deal at the next regional but it might come into question when moving on to the "dream" airline, unless you can give a good explanation.
Old 04-24-2015 | 05:54 PM
  #10277  
chazbird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Fifth floor, window
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Only training failures go on your pria, not incomplete. But it is in bad form to quit without giving at least two weeks notice. And it may be a requirement to not get a "would not rehire" check box marked. In fact, they would probably check that box regardless. Not a big deal until your next airline request your employment information. And probably still not a big deal at the next regional but it might come into question when moving on to the "dream" airline, unless you can give a good explanation.
Thanks for the PRIA clarification;. Older and have to stay bay-area based; Skywest, Virgin, UAL - or something home based (Atlas, Net Jets). I do not want to up and quit if I don't get SFO. My idea, 2.0: I can go to basic indoc, don't get SFO, finish basic indoc, then take a unpaid leave of absence until the next class that can offer me SFO. What, 2 weeks, a month? That way costs are controlled, I don't have to bail, nor take a type ride and quit because I don't get SFO. Seems novel, and fair, to me.(spent the last 5 years with parents elder care, not flying, and still have to be near by, which is my "explanation")

"They will torch your PRIA. Incomplete training. Good night sweet prince. Get in line like a man and deal with it you lazy punk."
Yeah, lazy. Moved 20 times for various flying gigs (inside and outside of the country) and have commuted.(did regionals 25+ years ago, too) No more moving or commuting.
Old 04-24-2015 | 06:36 PM
  #10278  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Look, there are ups and downs in the airline industry. Both at mainline and at regionals. When the tide was rising Comair got a really good contract, then it was ACA, then xjt, then air Wisconsin, then xjt again, then horizon. At that point the tide turned. Skywest CERTAINLY would've been up there with their hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. Skywest has been the most profitable regional in history, more so than any of the other ones I just mentioned that each raised the bar when it was their turn. If you don't think that Skywest pilots would've ever gotten a contract that was at least comparable to the top contract, then I don't know what to tell you. And now, almost every single regional is increasing their pilot cost by offering better and better compensation packages. Yet many of them are not even close to the profitability that Skywest currently has. I'm not saying that pilot unions are all powerful at all. Many of them have weak pilots in their MECs leading them. And dispute that, some of them are making gains. Now is the time to use some of that leverage to get up there in the top tier. If you don't think that you can do that with a pilot union at Skywest, then you are saying your pilots are not good enough to achieve it. I personally think they can if they were union. And that would help all the rest of us.

Anyway, of course it would be ideal if there was a single seniority list and one regional pilot Union. But the perfect shouldn't get in the way of the "better than what we have now." It honestly sounds like a convenient excuse to not be for a pilot union. I think it's a cop out since it'll almost certainly ever happen.
If Skywest were to unionize I've no doubt the pilot contract negotiated would be an industry leading contract. We would be the best compensated regional in the industry and then be undercut by our regional brothers on every RFP that came out. So, while the bragging rights of having a great contract, which you currently have, would be a nice talking point, having flying awarded to the company you're working for is the ultimate goal. We are still getting flying awarded and ideally the best way to continue have that happen is by providing an excellent product at or slightly above the median price point. Currently, that is what Skywest Airlines does. Yes we have issues with our pilot contract. Yes the negotiating process is frustrating and slow. But for the most part the conditions here are good and at this point in time I think the THREAT of a union outweighs the benefits of a union. That WILL change just not sure when.
Old 04-24-2015 | 06:43 PM
  #10279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: RJ Captain
Default

Chazbird, just a little fyi, SkyWest awards transfers on a monthly basis. You could get assigned MSP or ORD in training and then get a transfer a month later to SFO. As long as training is taking you may never spend a day back east or perhaps just a month or two.

Taking a quick look at the standing bids there aren't a while lot of pilots wanting it for the CRJ, however there are a bunch that want it on the 175.

You're not locked into a domicile and can change monthly if you wanted to -- assuming you have the seniority and there are openings.
Old 04-24-2015 | 07:07 PM
  #10280  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Currently, how long does it take to be awarded SLC out of training? How long to hold a line in SLC out of training? Does anyone have approximate timelines?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices