Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2015 | 07:26 PM
  #11611  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default Single list?

Saw this is the expressjet thread:

"Got the TA survey phone call today. Only interesting question. 1 to 5 how important is a single seniority list with Skywest? I told the guy I didn't even know that was on the table."

Is this even possible and what would that mean for a new hire if that went through? Number 6,000 then? That would be a deterrent.
Old 07-19-2015 | 07:36 PM
  #11612  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Not going to happen.
Old 07-19-2015 | 07:58 PM
  #11613  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GSintercept
Saw this is the expressjet thread:

"Got the TA survey phone call today. Only interesting question. 1 to 5 how important is a single seniority list with Skywest? I told the guy I didn't even know that was on the table."

Is this even possible and what would that mean for a new hire if that went through? Number 6,000 then? That would be a deterrent.
I could see them offering longevity to XJT employees (pay and vacation) but they would likely still be at the back of the seniority list. That's if anything like that ever came about.
Old 07-19-2015 | 08:09 PM
  #11614  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by GSintercept
Saw this is the expressjet thread:



"Got the TA survey phone call today. Only interesting question. 1 to 5 how important is a single seniority list with Skywest? I told the guy I didn't even know that was on the table."



Is this even possible and what would that mean for a new hire if that went through? Number 6,000 then? That would be a deterrent.

Theoretically possible. But the only thing that would make that happen is a lot of leverage.
Old 07-19-2015 | 08:41 PM
  #11615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Wink

Originally Posted by Squallrider
If you're looking % wise you won't ever get as much or even a third as year one increases, it's a huge change from 22/24 to 30....it's just not going to happen that you will get $6 raise.






The first year pay is allowed to go up to 36.50, from $22.00. If they can give a 66% increase to someone that hasn't contributed a penny to our bottom line, they should be able to come up with more for those responsible for the companies decades of profitability.
Old 07-19-2015 | 08:48 PM
  #11616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Wink

Originally Posted by amcnd
I think your right. Cola is needed. Back pay would be nice...But won't happen now.. Lets be reaistic. This is a huge step in the right direction.. We need ro take that first step. The second will come in 3years when this TA is up.. If we dont take this first step. I dont think will be taking any for 1-2 years... Im going with Yes..






Every single time we have the opportunity to make improvements the "yes voters club" always makes the "argument" that we can get them "next time"!


The time is NOW!


Vote NO!!!
Old 07-19-2015 | 08:53 PM
  #11617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Wow just wow yup this is easily going to pass and your paycheck won't look any different than it looks now.








Sure it will, it will be smaller than ever when they jack up our "share" of the health insurance again in a few months...
Old 07-19-2015 | 10:42 PM
  #11618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Downward Dog
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
, they should be able to come up with more for those responsible for the companies decades of profitability.
While Yes you are under paid, you are an hourly employee of many hourly employees.
Old 07-20-2015 | 07:25 AM
  #11619  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

i have been reading these for while and am seriously considering skywest, will be eligible in about 6 months. call me ignorant but since skywest in non union, who do the negotiations go through and why does there have to be a vote? no snippy comments please just trying to understand
Old 07-20-2015 | 07:47 AM
  #11620  
Jet87's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: OO RJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by ejericson
i have been reading these for while and am seriously considering skywest, will be eligible in about 6 months. call me ignorant but since skywest in non union, who do the negotiations go through and why does there have to be a vote? no snippy comments please just trying to understand
Because the company feels like if they let us pretend we have a union, we won't vote in a union. But in all seriousness they know if they just implement things without a pilot say, there will be a union on property pretty quick.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices