Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:06 PM
  #13301  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Hello gents,

Does anyone know if the full motion flight sim hours of the type rating course at Skywest can be used toward the ATP requirements (multi-engine hours) ? or do they want you to have those requirements before you start class ?
I know that from the present ATP-CPT course there are 6 full motion flight sim hour you can log, out of 25h of simulator towards the 50h requirement, just wondering if i could use more from the actual type rating course up to the max 25h motion sim.

Thanks in Advance
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:20 PM
  #13302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
From: I pilot
Default

Originally Posted by gdpt
Hello gents,

Does anyone know if the full motion flight sim hours of the type rating course at Skywest can be used toward the ATP requirements (multi-engine hours) ? or do they want you to have those requirements before you start class ?
I know that from the present ATP-CPT course there are 6 full motion flight sim hour you can log, out of 25h of simulator towards the 50h requirement, just wondering if i could use more from the actual type rating course up to the max 25h motion sim.

Thanks in Advance
Yes you can credit the sim time towards the ATP. 1475TT and 25 multi are what you need to start class.
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:26 PM
  #13303  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by Cazadores
Is the 175 that much more desirable than the -700? Seems like the -700 is the best, most versatile jet in the fleet.

That said I never have flown the 175.
The new AD on the 700 is destroying their life expectancy. It cost more to do the inspection than the plane is worth.
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:30 PM
  #13304  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
Ok well first off I don't believe they can extend rap + 16 unless that was recently changed. And reserve is reserve man. If they put you up in a hotel in another base to be on reserve there they can do that. You are a back up pilot. Also I'm pretty sure the longest they can put you on ready is 4 hrs. It might have been 6? I remember guys in my crash pad working for transtates that had to do 12 hr ready reserve shifts. And they did it back to back days.

But yes I agree with you being on call is a huge hit on qol. Hence why I won't do corporate flying. But really there is no need to act like reserve at Skywest is THE WORST THING EVER. Cause it's not man.

There are definitely a few things they could change to make it better. Like call in senority order instead of jr to senior and give the senior guys the option of picking it up until everyone below him is used. That would be cool for if you are trying to break guarantee.

And proffering as you mentioned. Also set up required reserves based on something. That way the number doesn't change willy nilly. So that line holders can drop and trade more reliably.

How it is right now isn't horrible but yes it could be better for the pilots.
Per the manual they will extend a RAP+2 hours for a max of 18 hours. I would not accept it but it is legal and they can do it.
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:31 PM
  #13305  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the reply, good news !
Some other airlines are more complicated about it... very happy to hear that.
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:56 PM
  #13306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
Ok well first off I don't believe they can extend rap + 16 unless that was recently changed. And reserve is reserve man. If they put you up in a hotel in another base to be on reserve there they can do that. You are a back up pilot. Also I'm pretty sure the longest they can put you on ready is 4 hrs. It might have been 6? I remember guys in my crash pad working for transtates that had to do 12 hr ready reserve shifts. And they did it back to back days.
I went back and tried to find a source for you, but our new and improved web site doesn't allow much searching. Basically they are saying under 117 that you can go beyond 16 hours, especially if it is a deadhead that is the last leg. Again, sorry I couldn't find the exact wording, but it was something that SAPA has brought up multiple times.
I agree with you that the company should be able to have you sit reserve in other domiciles, but why would you not do something as simple as making a OBR yes/no like they do for call first? If you have to sit reserve and you are getting a hotel or at a crash pad, would you not volunteer to sit OBR? Again, one simple thing that would make QOL for reserves better, but nothing will ever happen with it. And in the reserve guide it specifically says that 8 hours is the limit for RR, but CS has been trying to assign more than 8 hours. Probably hoping that the FNG's won't know the rules and do it.

Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
But yes I agree with you being on call is a huge hit on qol. Hence why I won't do corporate flying. But really there is no need to act like reserve at Skywest is THE WORST THING EVER. Cause it's not man.

There are definitely a few things they could change to make it better. Like call in senority order instead of jr to senior and give the senior guys the option of picking it up until everyone below him is used. That would be cool for if you are trying to break guarantee.

And proffering as you mentioned. Also set up required reserves based on something. That way the number doesn't change willy nilly. So that line holders can drop and trade more reliably.

How it is right now isn't horrible but yes it could be better for the pilots.
Proffering was supposed to be implemented but TG is using the excuse that it was something that KB agreed to and not him. Man how nice would it be if we could go back and take away things that previous SAPA leaders had agreed to that didn't work for the pilot group? Bucket system was a huge give away and someone on the forums said that SLC used to be min 7 and is now 25 despite the base shrinking. I have to respectfully disagree that reserve here isn't horrible. You get to see all the little tricks after years of reserve and all the new pilots should be very thankful they only had to spend limited time on-call.
Old 09-29-2015 | 03:23 PM
  #13307  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
Nearly all of the FOs I fly with have the seniority to upgrade. No one wants to commute to msp/ord though.
Got that right! I was actually halfway through upgrade when I realized *** am I doing to my quality of life and withdrew... I don't regret it for a second!!
Old 09-29-2015 | 05:49 PM
  #13308  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Proffering was supposed to be implemented but TG is using the excuse that it was something that KB agreed to and not him.
Can someone please explain what 'proffering' means? Thanks.
Old 09-29-2015 | 06:39 PM
  #13309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Another RJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by falcon99
Can someone please explain what 'proffering' means? Thanks.
Being able to choose what trips you want to get on reserve based on seniority. For instance maybe one pilot on reserve is a commuter and wants 4 day trips, where another person on reserve lives in base and wants shorter trips. By our current rules crew support will just do what they want and probably assign the commuter a bunch of locals and standups. Proffering would allow people on reserve to try to bid for the trips that they want to fly instead of being at the mercy of crew support.
Old 09-29-2015 | 06:40 PM
  #13310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by falcon99
Can someone please explain what 'proffering' means? Thanks.
In a nutshell:

Reserve peeps have the ability to bid for assignments.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices