Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2014 | 09:30 PM
  #8301  
WhoCares's Avatar
Free KoolAid 602 685 4000
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: N88301
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
And when they start sliding backwards because the current senior guys start looking at the lines, and thinking, hmmmmn, them lines look pretty tasty, think I will get me some, and bid the ERJ. This is how it has been at SKYW, if not every airline out there when a new airframe hits the certificate. Junior guys go whoohoo! Instant seniority, right up to the point where the guys who have been around awhile and have seen how SKYW operates, wait and see how it shapes up.
Reading how the "new guys" have all these "new" ideas on how to revamp upgrades and "fix" the problem(them being junior), and redesign the industry. Sorry sport, six months ain't nothin" I have farts that last longer, this is an endurance game, and if .005% of the stuff posted here and on other forums are what ya'all truly believe, you are in the perfect position to have the wool pulled right down over your eyes, and the ball gag cinched up nice and tight, just like it has been for the last 2 generations of pilots. The espousing of Ayn Rand and "Free Market Economics" makes Jonny O. ,Hulas and J.Smallsack as well as the rest of the industry execs, get mini-chubbies.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it....
George Santayana
This would be one of those farts you are referring to. Your posts stink, like your attitude, both of which continually repeat themselves. Just because you're paid to fly doesn't make you a professional.





.
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:06 AM
  #8302  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by WhoCares
This would be one of those farts you are referring to. Your posts stink, like your attitude, both of which continually repeat themselves. Just because you're paid to fly doesn't make you a professional.





.
Just like your screen name, who cares what you think. You spend 6 months in the industry and are an instant veteran with all the answers and solutions. Newsflash Violet, while you think you are a delicate snowflake, unique and different than every other one, you follow a entirely predictable pattern, pattern stupidity. But that's OK, you like many are just flashes in the pan, you will be working at Homer Depot or some other place that your expensive "Aviation Degree" will qualify you for, shortly. You don't like my posts because they taint your fantasy, guess what your fantasy is a nightmare, this industry will take your hopes and dreams, place them in a burlap bag along with a cinder block, drop them in the local pond and drown them like unwanted kittens. Now what was your solution for the upgrade question again....
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:12 AM
  #8303  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by etflies
I think he is referring to ERJ SFO specifically, which, is significantly more senior than ORD in both airplanes.
I'm not sure why anyone would bid sfo erj as a new hire. Pretty sure TG himself said they will bump junior guys out of base if they have to to make room for Brasilia transitions in the "Q & A"on swol. Or was that just my eyes fooling me??
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:20 AM
  #8304  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by SMACFUM
Is there an official source citing this policy?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, the official source is ALPA and CAPA.

Originally Posted by TheFly
He speaks the Truth. ALPA members got the email though. Somebody already posted it on APC…search it.
ALPA and CAPA got an email because it is those entities that make KCM happen. Merry Christmas.

Originally Posted by Squallrider
I understand Expressjet wanting ons list but what does that bring to the slywest people? Expressjet is a sinking ship with mostly 50 seater aircraft with continuous shrinking and an apparent toxic corporate culture. One list would just mean a worse upgrade and probably QOL over what we have now
Toxic corporate culture? We have the same management, the same people who make the business decisions. Before then, we were very content. But to answer your question, to get rid of the whipsaw. Why should we be ok with management pitting its employees against each other in order to suppress compensation? Its not right. This isn't competing against a separate corporate entity like Mesa or RAH. This is our management making us compete against each other before we compete against the rest of the industry. We are like animals being thrown into a pit to fight to the death when we should be working together to make money for our shareholders.

Originally Posted by skypilot35


Man you are definitely consistent with the union talk, I'll give you that. I do not think consolidating the regional seniority list has to be a union action. In fact I think as soon as you mention union and consolidation in the same sentence, the next thing that comes out of people's mouths is Railway Labor Act. The unions cannot, by law, play a functional role in the consolidation. But if WE, as an industry, were to petition for it then perhaps it could happen. Obviously, thousands of variables (and personalities) involved but I think it could happen. It cannot happen with a union.



We're not talking about one list for just ExpressJet and Skywest. We are talking about one list across the entire regional pilot group. The benefits to having one list far outweigh the detractors. Here are a few reasons why:

1) If you leave your current regional airline to fly for another regional airline you start at the bottom of the list and at the bottom of the pay-scale.

2) If you're a commuter your non-rev benefits are also greatly diminished. You are at the bottom of the turd bowl again.

3) The individual list at various companies strongly skews the balance of power to the side of management. For example, what incentive does AAG have to keep Envoy pilots happy? They are one of the more senior pilot groups (more expensive). Why would AAG award them contracts to fly when there are cheaper pilot groups?

One list, with a flat pay-scale and flat benefits package, would make contracts more about performance and less about compensation. It eliminates the whipsaw that we are all currently witnessing. If the contracts were about performance rather than undercutting the bid, I think most pilots could get behind that.

You concern about the upgrade times is understandable, but one list would not put someone with a higher seniority number in front of you for upgrade. The seniority number (call it an experience number) is for pay and benefits. For example, let's say Nevets decides he's fed up with ExpressJet. He leaves for Compass. Nevets is an experienced Captain with 15 years of seniority (hypothetical). The pay-scale for a 15 year Captain at ExpressJet is $99 (APC). The pay-scale for a 15 year FO at Compass is $44. Nevets would be at the top of the FO pay-scale. His seniority number (experience) is for pay and benefits only. His date of hire at Compass would be his number for upgrade. He still took a massive pay cut but he's not forced to start at $25 and he keeps his benefits. This type of seniority system would even out the playing field between companies.

The current seniority system does nothing but encourage the ruthless tactics employed by our individual management groups.

Now cue all the naysayers !
I never said it had to be a union action. But in order for pilot groups to talk collectively about something like this, they need to be unionized. In other words, the pilot leaders have to have the legitimacy of an NMB approved collective bargaining agent voted in amongst its members in order to say that they can speak for their pilot group. Otherwise, you have 18,000 individual voices. It's already hard enough with 20 voices. There is more power in lobbying when you have all leaders of all regionals being able to speak for their respective pilot groups than with individual pilots trying to do it when only less than 5% will take the time to actually write an email, much less walk the halls of Congress, if that's the strategy for one list. Which isn't the only path, by the way.

I like your idea with one list though. Its a good starting point.

Originally Posted by skypilot35
No, Nevets and I have had this discussion in the past. We are referring to a single list across the regional industry. He thinks the only way to do it is with a union, but as I pointed out before the current labor laws prohibits airline unions from taking this kind of action. It does not prohibit individuals petitioning congress.
This is not correct. Nothing in law prohibits a single seniority list. The obstacle, other than pilots themselves as seen by your discussion here, is management agreeing to it.
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:24 AM
  #8305  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

I did not say a single list was prohibited, I said you cannot use a union to get it.
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:35 AM
  #8306  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by skypilot35
I did not say a single list was prohibited, I said you cannot use a union to get it.
Your crackpipe must be hot to the touch, a union is they only way you will ever get one. If you think that the industry will implement a single list you are too high. A single list insures that any one pilot will only spend one year on first year pay, unlike now where many get the opportunity to perfect first year pay 2-3 times.

Last edited by ClickClickBoom; 12-23-2014 at 09:14 AM. Reason: Spelling
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:03 AM
  #8307  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
Your crackpipe must be hot to the touch, a union is they only way you will ever get one. If you think that the industry will implement a single list you are too high. A single list insures that any one pilot will only spend one year on first year pay, unlike now where many get the opportunity to perfect first year pay 2-3 times.
Fixed it.
It is ridiculous that any pilot has to "start" over. That is the main issue. I think you agree with that. There are laws in place written over 90 years ago that govern an industry that didn't exist. They need to change. Back to my crackpipe.

And all of this matters not because Envoy just passed their TA. The crap continues.
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:18 AM
  #8308  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by skypilot35
Fixed it.
It is ridiculous that any pilot has to "start" over. That is the main issue. I think you agree with that. There are laws in place written over 90 years ago that govern an industry that didn't exist. They need to change. Back to my crackpipe.

And all of this matters not because Envoy just passed their TA. The crap continues.
It's ridiculous if you are a pilot, it's just good business if you are an airline. I have been an advocate of the single list for 25 years, but as long as there are pilots willing to throw other pilots under the bus it will never happen....
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:34 AM
  #8309  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
It's ridiculous if you are a pilot, it's just good business if you are an airline. I have been an advocate of the single list for 25 years, but as long as there are pilots willing to throw other pilots under the bus it will never happen....
Unbelievable! You and I agree. Merry Christmas my brother.
Old 12-23-2014 | 10:24 AM
  #8310  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by skypilot35
I did not say a single list was prohibited, I said you cannot use a union to get it.
Ok, I thought you were saying that it cannot happen with a union. But I do disagree that you cannot use a union to get it. The problem lies with pilots actually agreeing on it first. The only way to get 18,000 pilots to agree to it is to have their collective voices heard through their "legitimate" elected leadership. You can certainly have the union lobby (happens almost everyday that congress is in session) for this. Or you can try to negotiate it with management. Either way, its easier (if not the only way) with a union at all properties.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices