Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2015 | 08:59 AM
  #8801  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 222
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Then maybe we have had some people start class then need to defer or something. WW hung out at the bottom of the list for quite some time. I think it was mentioned that he had to leave for military or something. I just see some weird things at the bottom of the list and I have given up trying to figure out what is going on there. I see people bounce around down there all the time, maybe it is after class starts and the SSN seniority is put into place?? It's not like we are ever told what class numbers are.

Also, nobody ever replied if the 2nd January and February upgrade classes had been postponed or pushed back. Is there anyone in those classes that can verify?
Yeah not sure what's going on with WW. He's been on the list for at least 4 or 5 months. They usually stick the cadets on the bottom of the list at the beginning of class, and then move them up a couple weeks later.
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:06 AM
  #8802  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
While SkyWest has always been one of the better regionals for looking ahead, I really feel they have lost the vision and instead focus on short term gains for long term pains. Or maybe they are brilliant and like CCB is fond or saying, are playing 3D chess while we are playing checkers.

We have too many training events going on, not enough staff for the inefficient 117 pairings, and everyone is getting hosed with their schedules. Since we don't have a contract, they can just randomly adjust the minimum reserves and make it so nobody can drop a trip and a majority of our guys are only getting 10 or 11 days off a month. And this is in the slow season. By summer we will have burned everyone out and we will get more messages from MT talking about how we need to improve our performance. Meanwhile, we will work harder than we should to fill classes or hire people that will get a type then quit and provide no relief to our overworked pilots.

Sometimes I really think they are just pushing the envelope to see how much they can get away with before we bring in a union. At this point, I think it would be better for the company and I don't think it was the threat that it has been in the past. But our apathetic pilot group will just keep watching our QOL diminish little by little until we finally realize we need protection, but we will be starting negotiations from almost zero by that point.

But at least we will save 2%....
SKYW, has been coasting along on their laurels for quite awhile. 117 has nothing to do with our horrid schedules, the problem lies in one office only, SS Reichsfuhrer Anita S. She has been outdated/and or outclassed since her Tandy computer was replaced with a 086 grade computer. Skywest has refused to adapt their old business model to the current times. Creating schedules from thousands of city pairs constrained by federal regulatory limits is a large problem, but if NASA can slingshot a space ship around the moon using nothing but sliderules, it is possible to schedule crews to fly airplanes. The reality is the schedules are published by the parent carrier, airframe numbers are known, crew numbers are predictable, the variables left are MX, weather and sickness calls. There are computers that can play chess at the grand master level, but SKYW can't build a semi efficient schedule? SKYW will either adapt or perish, and I don't see much adapting going on....

http://iveybusinessjournal.com/topic...e#.VMKQF4E76rU

Last edited by ClickClickBoom; 01-23-2015 at 09:18 AM.
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:14 AM
  #8803  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 694
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Five93H
Would the regional bean counters see this pattern and end up bypassing military guys? Worth it to pay for training if they'll be gone within a year? Not that they can be picky right now I suppose.
They can't be picky, they probably consider it worthwhile to train three military guys if they get to keep one for the long term.

Also it's blatantly illegal to discriminate against vets or reservists, and every military applicant is one or both.
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:18 AM
  #8804  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 694
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
SKYW, has been coasting along on their laurels for quite awhile. 117 has nothing to do with our horrid schedules, the problem lies in one office only, SS Reichsfuhrer Anita S. She has been outdated/and or outclassed since her Tandy computer was replaced with a 086 grade computer. Skywest has refused to adapt their old business model to the current times. Creating schedules from thousands of city pairs constrained by federal regulatory limits is a large problem, but if NASA can slingshot a space ship around the moon using nothing but sliderules, it is possible to schedule crews to fly airplanes. The reality is the schedules are published by the parent carrier, airframe numbers are known, crew numbers are predictable, the variables left are MX, weather and sickness calls. There are computers that can play chess at the grand master level, but SKYW can't build a semi efficient schedule? SKYW will either adapt or perish, and I don't see much adapting going on....

I think 117 had a big impact, but also concur that Anita is leaving a LOT of efficiency on the table due to pure laziness/narrow-mindedness/incompetence in CS. They DESPERATELY need to upgrade to windows 98 and pentium processors

One of our small bases had a incident recently where apparently a new-hire CS person was assigned the task of building pairings for the next month. She was apparently a bit obtuse and not supervised well, and since it required more work and mental horsepower to figure out overnights, she built an entire month using only locals with no or almost no multiday trips (possible since this was a satellite base, not a hub). Nobody noticed until it was too late...lot of peed-off commuters blew half their paychecks on hotels that month.
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:33 AM
  #8805  
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
MK Ultra Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think 117 had a big impact, but also concur that Anita is leaving a LOT of efficiency on the table due to pure laziness/narrow-sightedness/incompetence in CS. They desperately need to upgrade to windows 99 and pentium processors
Sorry,
As I sit here on a 30 hr layover, this is a refusal to adapt to the changing environment, SKYW has become the immobile behemoth that thinks that they are immune to, well just about everything. The mini-fiefdom builders in SGU are blocking the entity's ability to adapt to a rapidly changing climate. SKYW is just coming to the realization that pilots are a critical resource, without them airplanes don't move, and if the planes don't move, no cash is generated. Every other position within the company is replaceable/outsourceable, from the CEO to the janitor. SKYW as a company runs its self from Thursday afternoon to Monday morning on autopilot, SGU has ceased to be hungry, and has become greedy. Hunger drives innovation, greed drives gluttony. Decide for yourself where we are at now. They can't even decide to implement an EFB program, how in the world will they ever adapt to the current environment?
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:37 AM
  #8806  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter
I doubt it, same risk exists for a CFI type (PSA, TSA street capt thing, CPZ, exc.) It's no secret they've been working to find people, where in the recent past it wasn't an issue. It used to be pretty rare to have an RJ newhire that had never flown anything but a Seminole and Cessna. According to one of the hiring guys this is now the norm.
I would argue there is little to no risk at TSA CQFO because you will have like 400 guys below you withing 2 years. Pretty decent job security.

Also, we have done this before as an industry. Hiring guys straight from flight school isn't new to regionals.
Old 01-23-2015 | 09:46 AM
  #8807  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter
I doubt it, same risk exists for a CFI type (PSA, TSA street capt thing, CPZ, exc.) It's no secret they've been working to find people, where in the recent past it wasn't an issue. It used to be pretty rare to have an RJ newhire that had never flown anything but a Seminole and Cessna. According to one of the hiring guys this is now the norm.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
They can't be picky, they probably consider it worthwhile to train three military guys if they get to keep one for the long term.

Also it's blatantly illegal to discriminate against vets or reservists, and every military applicant is one or both.
Fair points, forgot about the legalities! (That's why I'm not in HR/Hiring)

Most guys I know in the regionals from the flight school (2005-2010 period) all went in with only CFI time.
Old 01-23-2015 | 10:27 AM
  #8808  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: RJ right-seat warmer
Default

Originally Posted by Five93H
Most guys I know in the regionals from the flight school (2005-2010 period) all went in with only CFI time.
Agreed. All 5 of my IOE/OOE checkairmen (I had a different one each couple of days) all came to SKW with flight instructor time only. Which was great...they were all excellent teachers.
Old 01-23-2015 | 10:46 AM
  #8809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
Sorry,
As I sit here on a 30 hr layover, this is a refusal to adapt to the changing environment, SKYW has become the immobile behemoth that thinks that they are immune to, well just about everything. The mini-fiefdom builders in SGU are blocking the entity's ability to adapt to a rapidly changing climate. SKYW is just coming to the realization that pilots are a critical resource, without them airplanes don't move, and if the planes don't move, no cash is generated. Every other position within the company is replaceable/outsourceable, from the CEO to the janitor. SKYW as a company runs its self from Thursday afternoon to Monday morning on autopilot, SGU has ceased to be hungry, and has become greedy. Hunger drives innovation, greed drives gluttony. Decide for yourself where we are at now. They can't even decide to implement an EFB program, how in the world will they ever adapt to the current environment?
Looks like its time for you to pack it all up and move on to one of those more efficiently ran regionals that has all their poop in one pile. I wish you nothing but the best out there.
Old 01-23-2015 | 10:51 AM
  #8810  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
Looks like its time for you to pack it all up and move on to one of those more efficiently ran regionals that has all their poop in one pile. I wish you nothing but the best out there.
This has got to be one of the most ignorant comments I've read on this forum to date....

If you had actually spent a dime of effort and money on your career, you would realize one doesn't simply just "start over" at another regional because they don't like what's going on at their current company, where they've been for 8+ years.

I don't care for some of the negativity here, but CCB has this right. Anita is a major stakeholder in over 85% of the problems on our end. Not that you, or anyone, in your office cares!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices