Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2015 | 05:57 AM
  #9801  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by CLT Guy
"Six figures" used to be a lot of money, but it just isn't anymore. I only care about "six figures" if the first number is something higher than a "1".
When I was a kid, $100K/year was the benchmark for real success, beyond what most folks could attain. Today it's $200K...inflation drives on.
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:03 AM
  #9802  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They're definitely closing bases in small towns (except the Mx bases), but that's pretty much done with at this point. The real upside to SKW is large hub bases in the west, that's not going to change anytime soon.

The bro pilots are mostly transitioned, except for a few niche bases. New-hires will not really notice much pain from that direction and it will be over with in a month or two anyway.

The bro pilots ALL had the chance to transition last year...some decided to try and wait until the end but ended up seat-locked on reserve as junior folks left. But that was 100% predictable , nobody to blame but yourself. They are pay protected at jet rates though.

The decision to come work at SKW used to be a no-brainer if you got an offer but now folks really need to consider all variables and options. It's a good bet if you have PIC but need some jet or FW time and the domicile geography works for you.
X2. Flyingirl is half right in that some of our bro bases are closing. But as far as shrinking and bro transitions plugging things up, I disagree. In fact, the bro transitions are a saving grace right now since we are short staffed and can't hire quickly enough. Still tons of movement here and it's not slowing down.

Also, your 6% women comment....absolutely irrelevant. That's on the ladies! Aviation is the most equal profession in terms of gender treatment except when it comes to hiring practices where ladies still have the advantage. With the current climate in aviation it's basically a no brainer for a woman.
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:18 AM
  #9803  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck
X2. Flyingirl is half right in that some of our bro bases are closing. But as far as shrinking and bro transitions plugging things up, I disagree. In fact, the bro transitions are a saving grace right now since we are short staffed and can't hire quickly enough. Still tons of movement here and it's not slowing down.

Also, your 6% women comment....absolutely irrelevant. That's on the ladies! Aviation is the most equal profession in terms of gender treatment except when it comes to hiring practices where ladies still have the advantage. With the current climate in aviation it's basically a no brainer for a woman.
The problem is not fair access for women, it's lack of interest in the first place. Most of my male non-pilot friends always want to hear about aviation...none of the women ever do. Women who complain about low representation are using those statistics to promote misplaced sympathy and further unnecessary artificial advantage for themselves. Why is it a problem if women are just not interested in the field? It's a free country, do what makes you happy. I don't want somebody in aviation who's just doing it to make a statement.

Minorities are a different issue, they may be limited by socio-economic circumstances from pursuing an aviation career, which requires money and education. I still don't believe in affirmative action, but rather prefer to solve this problem at the root... improve early education quality and availability, and also outreach.
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:40 AM
  #9804  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

The bro pilots ALL had the chance to transition last year...some decided to try and wait until the end .
So far that decision has paid off. Most of April will be a nice vacation.

As of now all but about 30 bro pilots in each seat have been awarded transition classes starting in the coming weeks. The next standing bid will cover the rest. Its not like there are hundreds of us looming around... it has been a well thought out draw-down, albeit slightly sad for the Brasilia family!
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:43 AM
  #9805  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The problem is not fair access for women, it's lack of interest in the first place. Most of my male non-pilot friends always want to hear about aviation...none of the women ever do. Women who complain about low representation are using those statistics to promote misplaced sympathy and further unnecessary artificial advantage for themselves. Why is it a problem if women are just not interested in the field? It's a free country, do what makes you happy. I don't want somebody in aviation who's just doing it to make a statement.

Minorities are a different issue, they may be limited by socio-economic circumstances from pursuing an aviation career, which requires money and education. I still don't believe in affirmative action, but rather prefer to solve this problem at the root... improve early education quality and availability, and also outreach.
Whoa. So women may not be interested in aviation because women as a whole generally aren't, but socioeconomic conditions may be the reason minorities aren't interested in aviation? My BS detector is going off. Aviation careers are a lot harder for women to hold due to our patriarchal society, which is another huge holdup for recruiting women into this field. Who wants to invest the time and money into this career when you are floating the idea of having a family?

What if minorities just aren't interested because they are interested in other things as a whole, as women are? Or what if a poor white male really wants to be a pilot, but for the same socio-economic reasons he can't. So the poor black/purple/orange kid gets financial help and becomes a pilot but the poor white kid can't fulfill his dream? That insane argument is the root of a lot of the modern racism, which in 2015 should be gone from civilized societies. But the discrimination against the white male by modern day America sets us back several decades.

I agree with everything else you said, I just don't think anyone should get anything free/subsidized in this country based on skin color or gender. That form of discrimination breeds contempt and causes more problems than it solves IMO.
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:55 AM
  #9806  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiten
Whoa. So women may not be interested in aviation because women as a whole generally aren't, but socioeconomic conditions may be the reason minorities aren't interested in aviation? My BS detector is going off. Aviation careers are a lot harder for women to hold due to our patriarchal society, which is another huge holdup for recruiting women into this field. Who wants to invest the time and money into this career when you are floating the idea of having a family?

What if minorities just aren't interested because they are interested in other things as a whole, as women are? Or what if a poor white male really wants to be a pilot, but for the same socio-economic reasons he can't. So the poor black/purple/orange kid gets financial help and becomes a pilot but the poor white kid can't fulfill his dream? That insane argument is the root of a lot of the modern racism, which in 2015 should be gone from civilized societies. But the discrimination against the white male by modern day America sets us back several decades.

I agree with everything else you said, I just don't think anyone should get anything free/subsidized in this country based on skin color or gender. That form of discrimination breeds contempt and causes more problems than it solves IMO.
No I said fewer women are interested in aviation, therefore fewer women pursue aviation, which is a not a "problem". If the lack of interest is because they want to have kids and stay home with them, nothing wrong with that either. Nobody is forcing anybody to get married, have kids, or assume any particular gender role in this century in the western world. Suit yourself.

20 years ago, I would have agreed that women would face resistance...not at the corporate level but more in the cockpit culture. But essentially all of the old dinosaurs are retired (or would have been if not for age 65...).

Minorities *may* be interested in aviation but not have the education/finances to pursue it. Also possible that they may be interested in other things instead, due to cultural influences. But like I said I prefer to solve that problem at it's roots rather just hand out freebies for somebodies entire life.
Old 03-30-2015 | 07:03 AM
  #9807  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Minorities *may* be interested in aviation but not have the education/finances to pursue it. Also possible that they may be interested in other things instead, due to cultural influences. But like I said I prefer to solve that problem at it's roots rather just hand out freebies for somebodies entire life.
I agree, except that I know white males who can't afford the track to become a pilot, and they shouldn't be passed over a grant or scholarship due to their skin color, if it's available to a minority. That's discrimination at its purest, based on ends justifying means, which, as you say, is doable by other means.
Old 03-30-2015 | 07:37 AM
  #9808  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

I think the biggest deterrent to women pursuing commercial aviation is simply not knowing about it. Most female pilots I know, including myself, have a dad who was a pilot and got into it early. The other deterrent is the schedule, which may improve as airlines hopefully try to improve conditions to retain pilots. Having a family and being away is tough but doable. I have to give all the fathers & their families credit with the low pay and unpredictable schedules. It's a lifestyle my traditionally structured family friends balk at and discourage me from pursuing. It's a different kind of life for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 03-30-2015 | 07:55 AM
  #9809  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

My friend flew the bro at SKW and said it ended up being around $75,000 as a captain after 7 or so years. That's just what he told me so this is definitely not in stone. With a wife and kids in California, that's rough!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 03-30-2015 | 08:36 AM
  #9810  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiten
I agree, except that I know white males who can't afford the track to become a pilot, and they shouldn't be passed over a grant or scholarship due to their skin color, if it's available to a minority. That's discrimination at its purest, based on ends justifying means, which, as you say, is doable by other means.

Like I said, I prefer to deal it with where you can fix the problem, ie elementary and secondary education. Wait much after that, you're just propping people up as opposed to helping them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices