Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2016 | 06:14 PM
  #3871  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
My take IAH is salvageable..(via the new AA flying) the Company still has 100 firm orders for 175's. They want to secure those before they have to pay a penalty. UA cant own a regional per there FA contract.. my guess is thery are about to raise pay.. not via a bonus. But straight up Pay. And increase the pilot profit sharing. Time will tell..
I didn't think they could just raise pay without the policy manual being renegotiated?
Old 10-22-2016 | 06:16 PM
  #3872  
elmetal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

It's not a contract. They can, and do, literally what they want.

I can't tell you how many times CS says "oh we don't do that anymore" and sapa just says "oh yeah they don't recognize that language anymore."
Old 10-22-2016 | 07:15 PM
  #3873  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal
It's not a contract. They can, and do, literally what they want.

I can't tell you how many times CS says "oh we don't do that anymore" and sapa just says "oh yeah they don't recognize that language anymore."
What screw support does is one thing but changing the policy manual is another. Per the courts eye it is legally binding, and I wouldn't think they'd just do it without a vote.
Old 10-22-2016 | 07:18 PM
  #3874  
elmetal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

Have you read any TRs from the past year?

Did you vote on any of them?

Case closed.
Old 10-22-2016 | 09:19 PM
  #3875  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
What screw support does is one thing but changing the policy manual is another. Per the courts eye it is legally binding, and I wouldn't think they'd just do it without a vote.
Is relocation incentives from a base that is closing part of the PPM? So even if the PPM is legal binding, who is going to take SGU to court if they decide to raise pay without a vote?

It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
Old 10-22-2016 | 10:46 PM
  #3876  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Is relocation incentives from a base that is closing part of the PPM? So even if the PPM is legal binding, who is going to take SGU to court if they decide to raise pay without a vote?

It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
And I hate to tell you, but it's not much better at a unionized carrier. "Don't like it?? Grieve it!"
Old 10-22-2016 | 11:09 PM
  #3877  
SMACFUM's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 521
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Is relocation incentives from a base that is closing part of the PPM? So even if the PPM is legal binding, who is going to take SGU to court if they decide to raise pay without a vote?

It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
^^ This. Spot On.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong on this......but as far as I'm aware, because SkyWest doesn't have an actual Union as recognized under the NLRA, we don't have the right to go directly to the National Mediation Board to resolve contract disputes like other unionized airlines have the ability to do.

Sure, our PPM might be (is) a legally binding document, but who cares? It's a moot point - if the pilots have absolutely zero resources to ensure its enforcement (like the NMB). An actual lawsuit would have to be filed in court. You think the company is gonna give SAPA the money to file a lawsuit against themselves?

Because we don't have a union as defined and certified by the NLRB, they don't recognize our PPM as a true collective bargaining agreement. It's a subtle, but very substantial distinction.

Last edited by SMACFUM; 10-22-2016 at 11:26 PM.
Old 10-23-2016 | 12:05 AM
  #3878  
SMACFUM's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 521
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
My take IAH is salvageable..(via the new AA flying) the Company still has 100 firm orders for 175's. They want to secure those before they have to pay a penalty. UA cant own a regional per there FA contract.. my guess is thery are about to raise pay.. not via a bonus. But straight up Pay. And increase the pilot profit sharing. Time will tell..
As far as I am aware, and I'm pretty sure about it. Only the first 100 were firm orders (the ones already on or coming on property by 2017). The outstanding 100 are options, not firm orders. I could be wrong though.
Old 10-23-2016 | 01:10 AM
  #3879  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing
When did you start class? Last I heard, they stopped doing this. (Which is good, cuz it's a b.s. practice.)
They did not stop this. The Cadets/ CTP guys were ahead of the guys coming in with ATPs and CL65 types already.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:18 AM
  #3880  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by SMACFUM
As far as I am aware, and I'm pretty sure about it. Only the first 100 were firm orders (the ones already on or coming on property by 2017). The outstanding 100 are options, not firm orders. I could be wrong though.
Technically they have 200 firm orders left 100 more for the ERJ and 100 MRJ.. we know the later wont happen... total ERJ were 200 firm and 200 options. And as far as a pay raise goes, sapa is involved.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices