Skywest v2.0
#3871
Dumb Pilot
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
My take IAH is salvageable..(via the new AA flying) the Company still has 100 firm orders for 175's. They want to secure those before they have to pay a penalty. UA cant own a regional per there FA contract.. my guess is thery are about to raise pay.. not via a bonus. But straight up Pay. And increase the pilot profit sharing. Time will tell..
#3872
It's not a contract. They can, and do, literally what they want.
I can't tell you how many times CS says "oh we don't do that anymore" and sapa just says "oh yeah they don't recognize that language anymore."
I can't tell you how many times CS says "oh we don't do that anymore" and sapa just says "oh yeah they don't recognize that language anymore."
#3873
Dumb Pilot
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
What screw support does is one thing but changing the policy manual is another. Per the courts eye it is legally binding, and I wouldn't think they'd just do it without a vote.
#3875
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
#3876
Is relocation incentives from a base that is closing part of the PPM? So even if the PPM is legal binding, who is going to take SGU to court if they decide to raise pay without a vote?
It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
#3877
Is relocation incentives from a base that is closing part of the PPM? So even if the PPM is legal binding, who is going to take SGU to court if they decide to raise pay without a vote?
It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
It used to be that just CS would just do whatever because there was no repercussion when they would violate the "rules". That mindset has now spread to all floors at meca. Anyone that thinks SGU won't do whatever, whenever obviously hasn't been paying attention over the past couple years. Any vote that would take place is after the negotiation has already been done. And by negotiation, I mean SGU telling SAPA what's going to happen and SAPA selling it to the pilot group.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong on this......but as far as I'm aware, because SkyWest doesn't have an actual Union as recognized under the NLRA, we don't have the right to go directly to the National Mediation Board to resolve contract disputes like other unionized airlines have the ability to do.
Sure, our PPM might be (is) a legally binding document, but who cares? It's a moot point - if the pilots have absolutely zero resources to ensure its enforcement (like the NMB). An actual lawsuit would have to be filed in court. You think the company is gonna give SAPA the money to file a lawsuit against themselves?
Because we don't have a union as defined and certified by the NLRB, they don't recognize our PPM as a true collective bargaining agreement. It's a subtle, but very substantial distinction.
Last edited by SMACFUM; 10-22-2016 at 11:26 PM.
#3878
My take IAH is salvageable..(via the new AA flying) the Company still has 100 firm orders for 175's. They want to secure those before they have to pay a penalty. UA cant own a regional per there FA contract.. my guess is thery are about to raise pay.. not via a bonus. But straight up Pay. And increase the pilot profit sharing. Time will tell..
#3880
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
Technically they have 200 firm orders left 100 more for the ERJ and 100 MRJ.. we know the later wont happen... total ERJ were 200 firm and 200 options. And as far as a pay raise goes, sapa is involved.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



