Concession discussions in our future?
05-18-2020 | 01:06 PM
#411
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
I do not want you to do it again also . I am all for a reduction of LG to keep pilots on the property.
05-18-2020 | 01:20 PM
#412
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Spitballing here but if you reduce LG wouldn’t that encourage the company to overstuff in the future for greater coverage at same rate? What would a snap back be based on?
any measure we take should not just focus on the here and now but what it’s implications can be down the road. (Yes I’m very much junior)
any measure we take should not just focus on the here and now but what it’s implications can be down the road. (Yes I’m very much junior)
05-18-2020 | 02:25 PM
#414
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 302
I’d also tie any voluntary reduction to profit. Once in the black by a negotiated % we get paid guarantee again, and I’d negotiate back pay for lost tfp to be paid once we hit a pre-determined financial goal.
05-18-2020 | 02:34 PM
#415
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 753
Likes: 206
single income, family of 4. No extra income stream. Without a guarantee of income being replaced, I say no concessions.
I’d also tie any voluntary reduction to profit. Once in the black by a negotiated % we get paid guarantee again, and I’d negotiate back pay for lost tfp to be paid once we hit a pre-determined financial goal.
I’d also tie any voluntary reduction to profit. Once in the black by a negotiated % we get paid guarantee again, and I’d negotiate back pay for lost tfp to be paid once we hit a pre-determined financial goal.
05-18-2020 | 03:10 PM
#418
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
Spitballing here but if you reduce LG wouldn’t that encourage the company to overstuff in the future for greater coverage at same rate? What would a snap back be based on?
any measure we take should not just focus on the here and now but what it’s implications can be down the road. (Yes I’m very much junior)
any measure we take should not just focus on the here and now but what it’s implications can be down the road. (Yes I’m very much junior)
That is a good point. It is in the best interest of the company to run lean, we use to be at 10 pilots per AC. I do not think the company wants to run fat. Once again JMO, and I know some may disagree with me .
05-18-2020 | 03:14 PM
#419
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
they’d run fat for the same cost any day of the week, more coverage. Less premium
05-18-2020 | 03:22 PM
#420
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
