Class Dates
#361
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 2
Likes: 2
Agreed. I easily give the company the benefit of the doubt on this topic. I think they have a pretty good history. I’m certainly not joining a group of anonymous posters, that I know nothing about, railing against the company for not hiring them. Strange enough, they all think they did great in the interview. When I returned from my interview, a peer asked what I thought. I said “it went well but I don’t think I got the job. It’s competitive and I didn’t come across as a super hero.” He was glad to hear me say that. He shared with me that he had 2 employees interview at SWA and had very different responses to the same question. They thought they aced it and were as good as hired. Both received a TBNT. Sure enough, I got a job offer and we both laughed about the situation. Do I think good guys fall through the cracks and a couple bad guys get in? yep. But overall, I trust the recipe. I work with an overwhelming amount of good dudes.
#362
Flying into “heavy combat” does not translate to 121. It’s an entirely different animal. CRM. Pax service. Communicating with gate agents. Ground. Rampers.
Not a bash on the military guys and gals at all. That’s tough and dangerous flying I’m sure and I appreciate their service, but 121 is just an entirely different animal. One does not translate to the other.
Not a bash on the military guys and gals at all. That’s tough and dangerous flying I’m sure and I appreciate their service, but 121 is just an entirely different animal. One does not translate to the other.
#363
Flying into “heavy combat” does not translate to 121. It’s an entirely different animal. CRM. Pax service. Communicating with gate agents. Ground. Rampers.
Not a bash on the military guys and gals at all. That’s tough and dangerous flying I’m sure and I appreciate their service, but 121 is just an entirely different animal. One does not translate to the other.
Not a bash on the military guys and gals at all. That’s tough and dangerous flying I’m sure and I appreciate their service, but 121 is just an entirely different animal. One does not translate to the other.
Stop it with the nonsense. Talking to the rampers or the gate agent is not on par with going through military officer training or being in combat. It's not even in the same dimension.
#364
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 94
Likes: 26
This statement makes my point, thanks. Being confident or cocky are two different things and *some of those that think they are confident are just cocky.
#365
On Reserve
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 23
burn me at the stake for saying this, but former military here. I have perspective from both sides as I gained my experience hauling checks, freight dawging. I can say mil experience definitely does not translate. That’s why so many mil guys have a deer in the headlights look when you speak of hauling freight, uncontrolled airports, crappy/no crew support.
#366
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Fairly easy for those in a 121 background. In my interview group we had a MIL C-17 guy. His scenario was a pax having a heart attack at FL370. He decided he was gonna spiral down to the airport he was directly above and land. Made that decision in about 20 sec. No input from anyone…”here’s what we’re gonna do”. Interviewers asked if he wanted to look at alternates, etc. “Nope”. Didn’t get hired.
During training we had MIL guys asking how to commute, pack for a 4 day, etc. I showed up for IOE and the CKA takes a look at my beat up bag and says, “oh thank god, you’re a regional guy, yeah?” I lol’d.
121 isn’t hard. It’s just different. Just like if you were using MIL terms to talk about a bombing run or aerial refueling or your training…I’d have a deer in the headlights look. Just use the resources given, be open to direction without taking it the wrong way, and have a good attitude….that’s all they’re looking for. You can train a monkey to fly a 737…you can’t train attitude.
#367
#368
#369
On Reserve
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
We used to have a 7 min CRM exercise in front of a paper tiger with a moving MFD for location. 2 interviewers would sit in and be your FO/jumpseater. You had a scenario and had 7 min to figure it out.
Fairly easy for those in a 121 background. In my interview group we had a MIL C-17 guy. His scenario was a pax having a heart attack at FL370. He decided he was gonna spiral down to the airport he was directly above and land. Made that decision in about 20 sec. No input from anyone…”here’s what we’re gonna do”. Interviewers asked if he wanted to look at alternates, etc. “Nope”. Didn’t get hired.
Fairly easy for those in a 121 background. In my interview group we had a MIL C-17 guy. His scenario was a pax having a heart attack at FL370. He decided he was gonna spiral down to the airport he was directly above and land. Made that decision in about 20 sec. No input from anyone…”here’s what we’re gonna do”. Interviewers asked if he wanted to look at alternates, etc. “Nope”. Didn’t get hired.
#370
Communicating with people the right way is a character trait some people are better at than others. And I am not saying military people are worse, just that it NOT an easy skill to pick up. Nobody here said that it is on par with getting fired at, just that it is different. But the fact that you think of it as "talking to" says a lot more than you think...
Basic people skills have nothing to do with military or non-military. Conflating what happens at a 121 with some enormously challenging skillset is silly. A military person can learn to work well with ops, the ramp, the FAs and the CSR the same way that a C-172 pilot does it when they get their first commuter job.
There are military guys with awful people skills who don't do well and there are civilian pilots with awful people skills who don't do well. I haven't met and don't know a single mil guy who had this huge struggle coming to an airline.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



