Class Dates
#371
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,715
Likes: 334
To be fair this more shows a lack of interview prep on this one guy than some larger trend of mil dudes lacking CRM skills as a whole... Any prep service worth their salt would have told our poor C-17 doofus exactly how to handle these kinds of CRM exercises if he'd taken the time to research it for 5 minutes.
#372
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 147
I don't recommend or even talk about the jerks I worked with and wouldn't want to sit next to on a trip of any length. Most people I worked with were great and I'd be happy to work with them again, so that doesn't come up very often at all. What does surprise me is when someone has literally everything going for them, and they can't even get an interview. They've got the hours. They're current. They have "real world experience" over decades of flying. They have spotless checkride and safety records. They've been recognized by previous employers as worthy of leadership roles. They have peers who will vouch for their credibility and character. And they're passed over to give interviews to people with under 3k hours on the basis of "more qualified". That is confusing and concerning. And none of it has anything to do with what those candidates personally feel about their own leadership qualities, because that kind of thing tends to come out in the interview, not in the application.
#373
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 774
Likes: 224
I just had that exact same experience this week. I thought I interviewed so/so at best. I like to think of myself as a good dude and fun to be around, but I didn’t feel like I exuded that in my interview. Seeing guys with way more hours who were way better spoken than me getting the TBNT made me 100% sure I didn’t get the job, especially with the current seemingly 30-40% CJO rate. Imagine my surprise getting a call from a chief pilot offering me the job haha
#374
You're grasping at straws, bud. I pushed back against the implication that somehow mil guys aren't equally qualified as RJ people or 135 or people or really...anyone.
Basic people skills have nothing to do with military or non-military. Conflating what happens at a 121 with some enormously challenging skillset is silly. A military person can learn to work well with ops, the ramp, the FAs and the CSR the same way that a C-172 pilot does it when they get their first commuter job.
There are military guys with awful people skills who don't do well and there are civilian pilots with awful people skills who don't do well. I haven't met and don't know a single mil guy who had this huge struggle coming to an airline.
Basic people skills have nothing to do with military or non-military. Conflating what happens at a 121 with some enormously challenging skillset is silly. A military person can learn to work well with ops, the ramp, the FAs and the CSR the same way that a C-172 pilot does it when they get their first commuter job.
There are military guys with awful people skills who don't do well and there are civilian pilots with awful people skills who don't do well. I haven't met and don't know a single mil guy who had this huge struggle coming to an airline.
"And I am not saying military people are worse" (reading skills).
When starting at a legacy RJ drivers are more qualified than military. Because they have relevant experience. Basic fact. Do military pilots have superior handling skills? Yeah, for upset recovery, for everything else less difference. Biggest plus with military is they are a known quality. Much harder to hide flying deficiency in the military. I thank you for your service. I have a lot of respect for the job and sacrifice. But it is a different job with a different skill set. I was military ATC, pilot now for almost 3 decades, think I have enough experience to have a valid opinion.
#375
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 289
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
I just had that exact same experience this week. I thought I interviewed so/so at best. I like to think of myself as a good dude and fun to be around, but I didn’t feel like I exuded that in my interview. Seeing guys with way more hours who were way better spoken than me getting the TBNT made me 100% sure I didn’t get the job, especially with the current seemingly 30-40% CJO rate. Imagine my surprise getting a call from a chief pilot offering me the job haha
#376
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 289
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Right, so going by that logic why do so many former military have a hard time adjusting to the 121 world?
#377
Line Holder
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 848
Likes: 26
How about being a personable human id talk to again after 4 days in the cockpit?
#378
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 774
Likes: 224
I’m a longtime military guy that went straight to SWA. It was definitely a whole different world. I don’t think any of this was hard but unfamiliar and I didn’t possess the battle rhythm for it. It took a few months to really get spun up. I like to think it would be the same situation for a life long civilian aviation guy. Give him a few months in the military world and he would catch on too. The only difference is the huge variety of mission sets vs 121 routine. I wouldn’t make a hiring decision based on one or the other. Also, The military is certainly not the same experience for everybody. Different branches, different airframe communities, different crew makeups, different missions, different complexities, different duty positions… declaring a guy as “military” is like referring to a guy as “white”. Not enough context to know anything about him. If you approach the transition with humility, as an opportunity to learn something different, you’ll catch up pretty quick. Let’s not act like this is super difficult.
#379
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 443
I’m a longtime military guy that went straight to SWA. It was definitely a whole different world. I don’t think any of this was hard but unfamiliar and I didn’t possess the battle rhythm for it. It took a few months to really get spun up. I like to think it would be the same situation for a life long civilian aviation guy. Give him a few months in the military world and he would catch on too. The only difference is the huge variety of mission sets vs 121 routine. I wouldn’t make a hiring decision based on one or the other. Also, The military is certainly not the same experience for everybody. Different branches, different airframe communities, different crew makeups, different missions, different complexities, different duty positions… declaring a guy as “military” is like referring to a guy as “white”. Not enough context to know anything about him. If you approach the transition with humility, as an opportunity to learn something different, you’ll catch up pretty quick. Let’s not act like this is super difficult.
Rehashing the whole mil vs civ thing is dumb. I have flown with complete douche canoes from both backgrounds. We all suck equally.
#380
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 774
Likes: 224
Exactly. It's basically meaningless. The reason military guys are sought out is because there is a built in 10 year screening program. Guys slip through, but they are the exception.
Rehashing the whole mil vs civ thing is dumb. I have flown with complete douche canoes from both backgrounds. We all suck equally.
Rehashing the whole mil vs civ thing is dumb. I have flown with complete douche canoes from both backgrounds. We all suck equally.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



