Class Dates
#422
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
Have you considered adding OAK, LAS and maybe PHX CA before downgrading? Lots of flights between LAX area airports and those 3... I could understand accepting downgrade before commuting across the country, but these 3 shouldn't be much worse than driving from say Inland Empire.
#423
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
If displaced pilots could only go to bases that had openings, I'd bypass for quite some time before upgrading just to ensure I never get displaced and have to commute. If they simply close my base entirely, I'd probably move.
#425
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 183
Likes: 1
If I'm remembering correctly, this has been multiple months now with big fat ZERO's on the vacancy bids. How are we this horrendously stagnant? March is supposed to be this massive bid shift (with a new base to boot). Don't we at least need to place a few new hires somewhere? It was so bad last year that I had to downgrade back to FO to keep my sanity. Don't regret it for a second. If United, et el, begin hiring thousands en masse next year, I can imagine our stagnant pond will be very attractive. I guess it was a 10-year upgrade when I was hired; I'll be a 10-12-year upgrade still.
Something has to give around here.
Poopoo out...
Something has to give around here.
Poopoo out...
#426
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 38
Sorry, I disagree with this. If they decided to close MCO and open HNL with no other vacancies I don't think the correct response should be for everyone to be displaced to HNL regardless of what their seniority could hold otherwise. Secondary displacements are no fun, but juniority is never fun. I think a better response would be TDYs or some other method of limiting shifts during periods of little to no hiring.
#427
Sorry, I disagree with this. If they decided to close MCO and open HNL with no other vacancies I don't think the correct response should be for everyone to be displaced to HNL regardless of what their seniority could hold otherwise. Secondary displacements are no fun, but juniority is never fun. I think a better response would be TDYs or some other method of limiting shifts during periods of little to no hiring.
#428
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
If I'm remembering correctly, this has been multiple months now with big fat ZERO's on the vacancy bids. How are we this horrendously stagnant? March is supposed to be this massive bid shift (with a new base to boot). Don't we at least need to place a few new hires somewhere? It was so bad last year that I had to downgrade back to FO to keep my sanity. Don't regret it for a second. If United, et el, begin hiring thousands en masse next year, I can imagine our stagnant pond will be very attractive. I guess it was a 10-year upgrade when I was hired; I'll be a 10-12-year upgrade still.
Something has to give around here.
Poopoo out...
Something has to give around here.
Poopoo out...
As far as upgrade time, who knows...2022-24 were heady days. We got over the AirTran hump and upgrade went from 8.5 years to 6 years in the matter of one month due to a seniority gap. Now we have another 2 year empty gap to fill. I always just assumed it would be a worst case scenario and was slightly surprised I went earlier than 10 years. I think the next couple vacancies are going to see the flow start a little bit and then it is really going to start moving after that. I put zero reliability of any rumor. I just go off of confirmed and publicly projected numbers.
#429
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 162
I was surprised that there was no movement at all, but there are also no bodies going into the system for this vacancy, so any movement would have been tiny adjustments. Also, just because there are zeroes doesn't mean nobody is going anywhere. There will still be bodies shifting around the system a bit.
As far as upgrade time, who knows...2022-24 were heady days. We got over the AirTran hump and upgrade went from 8.5 years to 6 years in the matter of one month due to a seniority gap. Now we have another 2 year empty gap to fill. I always just assumed it would be a worst case scenario and was slightly surprised I went earlier than 10 years. I think the next couple vacancies are going to see the flow start a little bit and then it is really going to start moving after that. I put zero reliability of any rumor. I just go off of confirmed and publicly projected numbers.
As far as upgrade time, who knows...2022-24 were heady days. We got over the AirTran hump and upgrade went from 8.5 years to 6 years in the matter of one month due to a seniority gap. Now we have another 2 year empty gap to fill. I always just assumed it would be a worst case scenario and was slightly surprised I went earlier than 10 years. I think the next couple vacancies are going to see the flow start a little bit and then it is really going to start moving after that. I put zero reliability of any rumor. I just go off of confirmed and publicly projected numbers.
#430
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
The thought of needing another six years to reach a 10-year upgrade is daunting, to be honest. When I first arrived, I knew we had longer upgrades, but perhaps ignorantly, I thought, 'Who cares?' Now I am far from a disgruntled FO, and I bring no animosity to the job, but I am only into year four; ten seems like a lifetime away. Who knows, as the years go by, seniority improves, schedules become more favorable, vacations increase, and so on, plus who knows what will happen with any new base, merger, or new fleet, and so on.
I don't really think it's going to be 10 years, but if you are prepared for that eventuality, you won't be disappointed if it is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



