Search
Notices

SWA ATN sli

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2011, 04:11 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by proletariatav8r View Post
Yes. Was it Pan Am or TWA who did it? DAL could have just as easily done the right thing and said, "thanks for sharing, we'll do the right thing and re-interview them all at least" Revolutionary eh?

I love when somebody tries to defend the indefensible.
Someone killed your cat? Why so sad?
buzzpat is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 04:35 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Left or Right, Whatev'
Posts: 157
Default

buzzpat, check your PM
proletariatav8r is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 05:06 PM
  #83  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: EMB-145, Left
Posts: 9
Default

As someone in my early 30's sitting near the bottom of this new list. I agree that looking at an 18 year upgrade isn't exactly how I visioned my career would go. However when I step back and realize that the biggest factor in getting to where I want to be in 30 years, isn't when I upgrade but rather how soon can I get a nest egg and the power of compound interest working for me. With that said the best thing for my future, is a job where as an FO I can start to make decent money while still relatively young. As I compare career paths with other of my regional friends who have moved on, it is likely they'll beat me to the left seat, but I like my odds of having a nest egg that will bring more to me in the long term than the harm of a delayed upgrade for a few years. Just the perspective of someone looking up at this new list.
DLJK is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 05:09 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by proletariatav8r View Post
buzzpat, check your PM
Got it. Will respond soon. Completely understand!
buzzpat is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 12:52 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by DLJK View Post
As someone in my early 30's sitting near the bottom of this new list. I agree that looking at an 18 year upgrade isn't exactly how I visioned my career would go. However when I step back and realize that the biggest factor in getting to where I want to be in 30 years, isn't when I upgrade but rather how soon can I get a nest egg and the power of compound interest working for me. With that said the best thing for my future, is a job where as an FO I can start to make decent money while still relatively young. As I compare career paths with other of my regional friends who have moved on, it is likely they'll beat me to the left seat, but I like my odds of having a nest egg that will bring more to me in the long term than the harm of a delayed upgrade for a few years. Just the perspective of someone looking up at this new list.
I can't fault that logic in and of itself. But does this proposed SLI contain relative seniority snapbacks if there are ever pay cuts in the future? Shirley SWAPA would have no problem including a stipulation like that, since pay cuts are impossible at the mightiest airline on earth, right?
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 02:41 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by DLJK View Post
As someone in my early 30's sitting near the bottom of this new list. I agree that looking at an 18 year upgrade isn't exactly how I visioned my career would go. However when I step back and realize that the biggest factor in getting to where I want to be in 30 years, isn't when I upgrade but rather how soon can I get a nest egg and the power of compound interest working for me. With that said the best thing for my future, is a job where as an FO I can start to make decent money while still relatively young. As I compare career paths with other of my regional friends who have moved on, it is likely they'll beat me to the left seat, but I like my odds of having a nest egg that will bring more to me in the long term than the harm of a delayed upgrade for a few years. Just the perspective of someone looking up at this new list.
Extremely smart perspective.


Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I can't fault that logic in and of itself. But does this proposed SLI contain relative seniority snapbacks if there are ever pay cuts in the future? Shirley SWAPA would have no problem including a stipulation like that, since pay cuts are impossible at the mightiest airline on earth, right?
+1

Seniority is non-negotiable once agreed upon , pay, however, is something that can change drastically from one contract to another. If the status quo stays as is, and SWA continues to lead the industry in pay, then guys like DLJK have no need to worry about upgrade as a goal to reach financial stability.

If, however, harder times happen to fall upon SWA, and drastic contractual cuts need to be made, FOs may not see 10+ years in the right seat in the same light as they do now. I of course don't wish any of this on anyone pilot group, just playing devil's advocate here, bad contractual agreements regarding SLIs seem to become much, much worse during harder times, and 10 years is a long time.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 07:44 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by DLJK View Post
As someone in my early 30's sitting near the bottom of this new list. I agree that looking at an 18 year upgrade isn't exactly how I visioned my career would go. However when I step back and realize that the biggest factor in getting to where I want to be in 30 years, isn't when I upgrade but rather how soon can I get a nest egg and the power of compound interest working for me. With that said the best thing for my future, is a job where as an FO I can start to make decent money while still relatively young. As I compare career paths with other of my regional friends who have moved on, it is likely they'll beat me to the left seat, but I like my odds of having a nest egg that will bring more to me in the long term than the harm of a delayed upgrade for a few years. Just the perspective of someone looking up at this new list.
DLJK,
This is a very logical thought process, however you are probably new to the Airline Industry. What you will find as you gain experience is that Seniority is absolutely the most important thing in your airline career. Pay and benefits come and go, but seniority will define your career. You absolutely can not blame SWAPA for trying to negotiate a Seniority Grab on behalf of their pilot group, and justifying it through the pay raise. But, by the same token, ALPA should be fighting tooth and nail to prevent a seniority windfall for WN pilots.

SWAPA is very smart, they are trying to secure the votes of the AirTran Captains (seat protection/pay raise) as well as the Junior F/Os (pay raise) at the expense of the middle seniority group, all the senior F/Os. My humble opinion is, an arbitrator would use a better Ratio model. But that is the million dollar question for AirTran voting pilots, what do you do? Take the pay with the staple job or roll the dice through arbitration. SWAPA is hoping pilot greed will prevail and you take the deal for the money. I would speculate, IMHO that most AirTran pilots will regret this decision in the long run, even with a nice "nest egg" in their bank account.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 08:24 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

SWA's cultural identity are at risk here. Should one group feel like they were screwed over, it will fester. And one only has to look at the legacy's to understand what happens when the workforce becomes divided.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 08:56 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by John Robie View Post
SW has 10yr FOs now...What's the BFD
Because, to take a hit in relative seniority is one thing. But, to add additional restrictions to upgrade time is something entirely different. It's a double hit.

It's as if all AT pilots will lose relative seniority for schedule bidding purposes, but all AT FO's will be effectively stapled to the bottom of the list for upgrade purposes for 9 years.

In essence, what seems to be offered is a 9 year staple for AT FO's. Which will seem much longer, because it's not like in 2020 all of them will be magically made captains. If SWA is not upgrading, they wait some more. Even if they are upgrading, it's one at a time.

The offer is a clever way to mask the staple, but it is what it is.

Last edited by newKnow; 07-31-2011 at 09:54 AM.
newKnow is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 10:18 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B737/Capt
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I can't fault that logic in and of itself. But does this proposed SLI contain relative seniority snapbacks if there are ever pay cuts in the future? Shirley SWAPA would have no problem including a stipulation like that, since pay cuts are impossible at the mightiest airline on earth, right?
The "mightiest" airline on earth? Naw.............but don't call me Shirley!
OscartheGrouch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM
corl737
Major
7
01-22-2006 10:05 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices