![]() |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2883089)
Ha! Did you hear that from a mechanic or a flight attendant?
Word at DL (along with the delay of the 321NEO) is that we’ll be exercising an additional 100 options. So, literally the opposite of your wishful post. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 2883106)
Hope you guys like flying the Max, there’s a lot of them coming your way.
|
Originally Posted by David Puddy
(Post 2883125)
Delta wants to be the launch order to the 797 - if Boeing can get its act together. Can’t imagine the incremental benefit a 737-8/9/10 MAX could offer over the A321 NEO would be so huuuuuge. The MAX, like all 737s, is uncomfortable for both pax and pilots relative to the Airbus. Just ask any SWA pilot how his back/azzz feels after 5 years of flying the 737 NG/MAX. It ain’t good.
|
Originally Posted by StrykerB21
(Post 2883097)
Cessna Caravans. A thousand of em.
|
Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW
(Post 2883193)
Flows with PenAir, Key Lime, Cape Air, and All ATPs to be announced shortly.
|
Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW
(Post 2883193)
Flows with PenAir, Key Lime, Cape Air, and All ATPs to be announced shortly.
|
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2883265)
I’ll take those prop guys over magenta line kids....
|
Originally Posted by CLRtoPush
(Post 2883285)
Why? Airbus was built for magenta line kids.
Just because the Airbus was designed to be flown by 250 hr pilots does not mean there isn’t a benefit of having pilots with strong foundations in flying real airplanes. Cars on the road today are designed with blind spot sensors, stopping sensors, rear view cameras etc.....so does that mean you’re better off with an 18 year old who only has learned to and relied on these cars, or someone who has 30 years of driving experience who still checks their blind spot because they learned at a time where there wasn’t a blind spot alert? |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2883290)
Just because the Airbus was designed to be flown by 250 hr pilots does not mean there isn’t a benefit of having pilots with strong foundations in flying real airplanes. Cars on the road today are designed with blind spot sensors, stopping sensors, rear view cameras etc.....so does that mean you’re better off with an 18 year old who only has learned to and relied on these cars, or someone who has 30 years of driving experience who still checks their blind spot because they learned at a time where there wasn’t a blind spot alert? Which is to say I agree with you completely. |
Originally Posted by Golfgameonpar
(Post 2883040)
You sir are correct! Spirit is finalizing a deal with Delta to acquire 100 321 NEO aircraft with options for an additional 100. Delta placed this order in 2017 and deliveries start January 2020. Delta is currently working on a deal with Boeing to acquire a large number of MAX jets (quantity and airframe are still unknown) in an attempt to grow and gain control of KSEA while helping Americas largest aircraft manufacturer get back on their feet. There has been great efforts on all parties involved to get this deal done in a timely manner but due to the complexity of a transaction of this magnitude it is taking longer than anticipated. Please be patient
So the airline that puts the freeze on anybody growing in ATL, that also allegedly stopped SW from building a terminal on the south cargo ramp, is going to do a 100 plus aircraft deal with NK? OK. |
If it makes dollars and sense, yes, yes they would.
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 2883401)
So the airline that puts the freeze on anybody growing in ATL, that also allegedly stopped SW from building a terminal on the south cargo ramp, is going to do a 100 plus aircraft deal with NK? OK.
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 2883401)
So the airline that puts the freeze on anybody growing in ATL, that also allegedly stopped SW from building a terminal on the south cargo ramp, is going to do a 100 plus aircraft deal with NK? OK.
|
One bus two buses. For the love of God stop saying airbii
|
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2883489)
One bus two buses. For the love of God stop saying airbii
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2883469)
You sure give Delta a lot of power. Do a little research and you will find gates are not the issue. ATL airport moves more aircraft than any other airport with 5 or more runways. What Atlanta needs for growth is another runway to go with a additional gates already planned. Delta by the way pushed for a terminal G which was rejected by the airport authority as too expensive. Instead existing terminals are being extended. Delta has also offered to demolish their current headquarters and all the training facilities to get a sixth runway built in ATL. Does not sound like they are trying to restrict capacity!
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2883469)
You sure give Delta a lot of power. Do a little research and you will find gates are not the issue. ATL airport moves more aircraft than any other airport with 5 or more runways. What Atlanta needs for growth is another runway to go with a additional gates already planned. Delta by the way pushed for a terminal G which was rejected by the airport authority as too expensive. Instead existing terminals are being extended. Delta has also offered to demolish their current headquarters and all the training facilities to get a sixth runway built in ATL. Does not sound like they are trying to restrict capacity!
|
Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
(Post 2883566)
I wish LAX would get their ess together too. During rush hour, it takes vehicles 50 minutes to go from the entrance to the exit.
|
No clue why we stay in LGB. Way better options closer to the airport. Hermosa, Manhattan,Redondo and many more.
|
Originally Posted by ropestart
(Post 2883667)
No clue why we stay in LGB. Way better options closer to the airport. Hermosa, Manhattan,Redondo and many more.
I think we’ve seen a steady decline in hotels since this contract was signed. I don’t mind being near the airport and am a fan of the new hour requirements for long vs short. The problem is that there are loopholes such as Boston where the long is just as close as the short and the short is garbage. Our language is far too weak for what’s satisfactory and when we had more “long” layovers the hotels available usually exceeded the requirements. Now that we have a lot more “short” layovers it brings in a lot more crummy hotels that meet our contract and since spirit bids as low as it can we end up at these. Hotel quality should be a priority in the next round or mid cycle if we can. To me long or short shouldn’t matter and we should be at a four or five star hotel in either situation. That’s not happening today. Keep bringing shortcomings of hotels to the appropriate people. We can’t get a change if folks just accept the garbage they give us. |
Just give me a clean room with a comfortable bed that has plenty of food options within walking distance.
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2883674)
No one else wants our business for what Spirit is willing to pay to satisfy our contract requirements. Also, other airlines stay there so they satisfy past arbitration. I hate the drive to Long Beach more than anyone but I do like the Westin.
I think we’ve seen a steady decline in hotels since this contract was signed. I don’t mind being near the airport and am a fan of the new hour requirements for long vs short. The problem is that there are loopholes such as Boston where the long is just as close as the short and the short is garbage. Our language is far too weak for what’s satisfactory and when we had more “long” layovers the hotels available usually exceeded the requirements. Now that we have a lot more “short” layovers it brings in a lot more crummy hotels that meet our contract and since spirit bids as low as it can we end up at these. Hotel quality should be a priority in the next round or mid cycle if we can. To me long or short shouldn’t matter and we should be at a four or five star hotel in either situation. That’s not happening today. Keep bringing shortcomings of hotels to the appropriate people. We can’t get a change if folks just accept the garbage they give us. No doubt NK tries to pay pennies on the dollar for everything... but it’s all negotiated by hotel connections and LGB is a bad example... United, BA, numerous middle eastern carriers all stay there... from LAX....? Disregard... after a quick edit and reading further in depth that’s pretty much exactly what you said!! |
Originally Posted by ropestart
(Post 2883667)
No clue why we stay in LGB. Way better options closer to the airport. Hermosa, Manhattan,Redondo and many more.
Long Beach is the best overnight in the system. Easy access to beach, waterfront, good food (and so much variety of it,) bars, bike rental, and a clean, safe area. Don't F this up, nothing else will be this good. (...aaaaannnd I just doomed us all) |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2883674)
No one else wants our business for what Spirit is willing to pay to satisfy our contract requirements. Also, other airlines stay there so they satisfy past arbitration. I hate the drive to Long Beach more than anyone but I do like the Westin.
I think we’ve seen a steady decline in hotels since this contract was signed. I don’t mind being near the airport and am a fan of the new hour requirements for long vs short. The problem is that there are loopholes such as Boston where the long is just as close as the short and the short is garbage. Our language is far too weak for what’s satisfactory and when we had more “long” layovers the hotels available usually exceeded the requirements. Now that we have a lot more “short” layovers it brings in a lot more crummy hotels that meet our contract and since spirit bids as low as it can we end up at these. Hotel quality should be a priority in the next round or mid cycle if we can. To me long or short shouldn’t matter and we should be at a four or five star hotel in either situation. That’s not happening today. Keep bringing shortcomings of hotels to the appropriate people. We can’t get a change if folks just accept the garbage they give us. Have send screenshots of the BOS “long” drive being shorter than the BOS “short” drive to the hotel committee every short BOS layover, no response.... also, sorry, but love LGB, just need to adjust pickups for early show, was at the gate 40 minutes before show last few times, emailed ALPA, nothing. |
Ask 2200 pilots what makes a good hotel and acceptable hotel language, get 2200 opinions.
And I agree with those who think the new 18 hour long language is ridiculous. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2883836)
There are no reasonable hotels in those areas that don't involve a mile walk to the water. And the drive down Hwy 1 takes just as long as the drive to Long Beach.
Long Beach is the best overnight in the system. Easy access to beach, waterfront, good food (and so much variety of it,) bars, bike rental, and a clean, safe area. Don't F this up, nothing else will be this good. (...aaaaannnd I just doomed us all) |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2883918)
Ask 2200 pilots what makes a good hotel and acceptable hotel language, get 2200 opinions.
And I agree with those who think the new 18 hour long language is ridiculous. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2883836)
There are no reasonable hotels in those areas that don't involve a mile walk to the water. And the drive down Hwy 1 takes just as long as the drive to Long Beach.
Long Beach is the best overnight in the system. Easy access to beach, waterfront, good food (and so much variety of it,) bars, bike rental, and a clean, safe area. Don't F this up, nothing else will be this good. (...aaaaannnd I just doomed us all) |
The people who preach about the LBC Westin have never had the privilege of staying at the alternate long Crowne in Redondo.
Makes Long Beach look like the Red Lion MDT. |
Give me a comfortable bed, a reliable shuttle, free breakfast without powdered eggs, and food/stuff to do around.
|
Originally Posted by YourMom
(Post 2884126)
Give me a comfortable bed, a reliable shuttle, free breakfast without powdered eggs, and food/stuff to do around.
And keep your shuttle, I’ll take the private transportation. Regional mentality. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 2884041)
Agreed, wish we could have kept the old rules but I had no say since I was a probie back then. From what I remember the company was fine with leaving the hotel language unchanged but ALPA stepped in because pilots were b*tching about the van ride to some of the long stays hotels and now we have sacrificed overnight QOL to stay at Hampton Inn/Comfort Inn/Holiday Inn Express by the airport. And to top that off we get to share the hotel shuttle with pax who don't know where the hell they supposed to be going.
|
Originally Posted by nkbux
(Post 2884141)
Really? Where do we stay in a HI express?
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 2884150)
Disregard, I was referring to DTW and thought it was a HI express but it is a normal HI. But still...the point is these hotels offer limited options for food and exercise compared to the long stay hotels. At a short stay hotel you just have to deal with whatever is there and risk the safety issue of walking down a busy airport street with little to no sidewalks or crosswalks, unless the company wants to provide a rental car for us at all short stays over 14 hours. That will never happen though.
Remember when we switched from the Holiday inn in LGA? Guys were upset they lost their $9 hamburger meal at the Holiday Inn. Why stay in the city with the best food in the world when you can have a $9 Holliday Inn burger in Queens. Like I said...ask 2200 pilots....get 2200 responses. |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2884153)
You’re forgetting the simple issue; so many of our group wants a 5 minute shared shuttle ride to the airport, hotel happy hour, free breakfast, and shuttles that run on the half hour.
Remember when we switched from the Holiday inn in LGA? Guys were upset they lost their $9 hamburger meal at the Holiday Inn. Why stay in the city with the best food in the world when you can have a $9 Holliday Inn burger in Queens. Like I said...ask 2200 pilots....get 2200 responses. |
Originally Posted by Deathwish
(Post 2884165)
The hotel committee is actively trying to leave the HI Secaucus, e-mail them with your suggestions please.
Done and done |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2884140)
Ugh. Typical pilot. “Free breakfast”. You make a quarter mil a year, buy a breakfast; cheap
And keep your shuttle, I’ll take the private transportation. Regional mentality. |
Originally Posted by YourMom
(Post 2884219)
Frugal. I like spending money on bigger things. Typical pilot is ok with me. The shuttle with delays works better, but the fancy private transportation is a nice touch once in a while.
The new hotel policy under the new contract (and post PBS) has created far more short stay hotels as the company builds shorter layovers into the pairings. Part of the savings the company has realized with the short stay hotels is the reduced need for private transportation since short stay hotels usually provide van service. We’re also seeing far more short stay hotels which are not full service, meaning to hotel restaurant/bar and fake food for breakfast (powdered eggs, meat-like bacon). Just because it’s s short stay the hotel quality should not be reduced. BOS short sucks. PIT short sucks. DFW short sucks. CMH short sucks. All Hotels weather long or short should be full service and at least a Crowne Plaza/Marriott/Hilton/Sheraton quality. |
Possible Plane Order
The old Pittsburgh long was the best and we lost it I heard. Embassy suites right downtown... Perfect pilot hotel...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Phl and atl short. Horrible for a 16 hour overnight. Zero options for food. Not a single thing to do outside except stand in a parking lot.... let’s stop calling an 18 hour overnight short....
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands