Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Jet blue wants us now >

Jet blue wants us now


Notices

Jet blue wants us now

Old 05-19-2022 | 02:16 PM
  #681  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
ok, you have it all figured out then, 👌🏼. Lets see how it plays out. Airline Pilot one day, SEC investigator the next, lol. I’m sure Franke is dumb enough to go about this illegally….GMAFB.
I don’t have it all figured out nor have I made such a claim. I’m also not running around thinking about this and making emotional arguments and appeals to authority. Btw, I caught that you had to edit to get a couple of zingers in. Very mature.

The naďveté to assume that any large business transaction is completely on the up and up is GMAFB territory. You probably think that accepting a merger proposition without soliciting any other offers, turning down a vastly superior unsolicited offer on the front end and not using that offer to seek a better one from the original suitor constitutes the BOD doing it’s fiduciary responsibilities.
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:25 PM
  #682  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 278
Default

Originally Posted by onedolla
So JB did all this in the hopes that no one would read the fine print? Now that’s an interesting theory…
This is the narrative Ted Christie is spinning. Let's see how it plays out. Seems like there are some shady tactics going on with both sides.
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:33 PM
  #683  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
I don’t have it all figured out nor have I made such a claim. I’m also not running around thinking about this and making emotional arguments and appeals to authority. Btw, I caught that you had to edit to get a couple of zingers in. Very mature.

The naďveté to assume that any large business transaction is completely on the up and up is GMAFB territory. You probably think that accepting a merger proposition without soliciting any other offers, turning down a vastly superior unsolicited offer on the front end and not using that offer to seek a better one from the original suitor constitutes the BOD doing it’s fiduciary responsibilities.
BS, I didn’t edit any “Zingers”. Have a Mod look at my edit history……
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:34 PM
  #684  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 490
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
I don’t have it all figured out nor have I made such a claim. I’m also not running around thinking about this and making emotional arguments and appeals to authority. Btw, I caught that you had to edit to get a couple of zingers in. Very mature.

The naďveté to assume that any large business transaction is completely on the up and up is GMAFB territory. You probably think that accepting a merger proposition without soliciting any other offers, turning down a vastly superior unsolicited offer on the front end and not using that offer to seek a better one from the original suitor constitutes the BOD doing it’s fiduciary responsibilities.
vastly superior offer is subjective. From where I sit it’s not. Capping my share price at $30 which could take many months to years to actually receive doesn’t sound too sexy to me. If your cost basis is say $28 then waiting around to receive $2.00 premium doesn’t sound so exciting. Based on a hypothetical 1000 shares, at todays prices a $30 price is only an $8,000 premium. ULCC only needs to be in the $15-$16 range to make this an even offer. That’s hardly enough for me to be pro B6 with the disruption to personal QOL. And how do we know our BOD hasn’t asked F9 to sweeten the pot? Notice who’s been absolutely silent. Indigo. If this proxy vote is a no, then perhaps indigo has some spare change waiting in the wings to sweeten the pot and put it up for a vote agin? Indigo is many things if not shrewd. Their silence is almost telling. Letting the carnival barkers over at B6 making all this noise could be playing right into Franke’s hands. We go straight up F9 he gets it at the original price. We say no, perhaps they up it. Sitting idly by and letting their dream deal go down without a fight seems implausible to me.
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:44 PM
  #685  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
vastly superior offer is subjective. From where I sit it’s not. Capping my share price at $30 which could take many months to years to actually receive doesn’t sound too sexy to me. If your cost basis is say $28 then waiting around to receive $2.00 premium doesn’t sound so exciting. Based on a hypothetical 1000 shares, at todays prices a $30 price is only an $8,000 premium. ULCC only needs to be in the $15-$16 range to make this an even offer. That’s hardly enough for me to be pro B6 with the disruption to personal QOL. And how do we know our BOD hasn’t asked F9 to sweeten the pot? Notice who’s been absolutely silent. Indigo. If this proxy vote is a no, then perhaps indigo has some spare change waiting in the wings to sweeten the pot and put it up for a vote agin? Indigo is many things if not shrewd. Their silence is almost telling. Letting the carnival barkers over at B6 making all this noise could be playing right into Franke’s hands. We go straight up F9 he gets it at the original price. We say no, perhaps they up it. Sitting idly by and letting their dream deal go down without a fight seems implausible to me.
Purchase price of a share of stock has nothing to do with when you should sell. You don’t sell a stock based on its value when you bought it, you sell it based on its current and future value. A 50-100% premium to today’s price is a “good” deal (otherwise the price of the stock would inherently be higher). If you want to make an argument that you think ULCC/SAVE are severely undervalued at their current share prices and SAVE will be higher than $30 (or equivalent if F9 merger happens) 1-2 years from now, that’s a valid argument, but basing a vote on an expected 50-100% ROI in 12-24 months is a bit aggressive, especially with the headwinds this industry/economy is facing.
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:55 PM
  #686  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
BS, I didn’t edit any “Zingers”. Have a Mod look at my edit history……
Uh huh. That’s why your original post ended at “seeing how this all plays out” and when I quoted it to reply there were suddenly some jabs added at the end. Bad enough to be a jerk. Go ahead and own it.
Old 05-19-2022 | 02:57 PM
  #687  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 490
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
Purchase price of a share of stock has nothing to do with when you should sell. You don’t sell a stock based on its value when you bought it, you sell it based on its current and future value. A 50-100% premium to today’s price is a “good” deal (otherwise the price of the stock would inherently be higher). If you want to make an argument that you think ULCC/SAVE are severely undervalued at their current share prices and SAVE will be higher than $30 (or equivalent if F9 merger happens) 1-2 years from now, that’s a valid argument, but basing a vote on an expected 50-100% ROI in 12-24 months is a bit aggressive, especially with the headwinds this industry/economy is facing.
I completely disagree. Imagine both of our surprises?! When you sell a stock is an individual and personal decision. Me, personally am not selling a stock at $30 I bought for $28. I buy stocks to invest in a company that i Believe will
Climb much higher and therefore make me Money. If that’s $1000 profit or $10,000 profit that’s up to the individual investor. You May think that $8000 is a ‘good deal.’ And perhaps it is . For you. But what do you have to give up personally by going the way of B6 to Harvest that profit? $8000 is 1/2 month or less for most captains. Simply not rich enough for me. I’ll gladly take the risk in owning more shares of ULCC and see where that gets me in 5 years time. I’m a buy and hold type of investor. I stipulate not everyone is. Throw in the $30 isn’t an instant payout then Definitely count me out. And if there’s so many headwinds ahead then why is B6 offering such a ‘premium’ and basically over paying for Nk?
Old 05-19-2022 | 03:28 PM
  #688  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
Uh huh. That’s why your original post ended at “seeing how this all plays out” and when I quoted it to reply there were suddenly some jabs added at the end. Bad enough to be a jerk. Go ahead and own it.
lol you mean the part about calling you an “SEC Investigator” 😂😂. Not sure that qualifies as a “Zinger”. Anyway, here we all are going back and forth over something we unfortunately have zero control over, kinda pointless……. Inshallah
Old 05-19-2022 | 03:33 PM
  #689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Men can get pregnant now, Government admits there’s UFOs, Gas is over $5.00 nothing should surprise you anymore 😁
Dont forget monkeypox.
Old 05-19-2022 | 04:09 PM
  #690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Doesn’t matter, NK/B6 isn’t happening. Did anyone bother reading the talking points from todays comms? JetBlue’s offer lets them off the hook if the stock market declines more than 10% since May 13, (hmmmm anyone paying attention to recent trends? their financing expires in 14 months. Their bid is BS It’s designed to blow up the NK/F9 merger…… I said what I said. 🤷🏻‍♂️

agreed. And I don’t like our mismanaged management
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FLPilot50
Part 135
24
12-10-2019 06:03 PM
APCJacob
JetBlue
44
02-08-2019 02:41 AM
Fins Up
Major
245
04-01-2014 03:39 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-30-2009 03:56 AM
Bengalsfan
JetBlue
47
07-04-2005 11:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices