Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2015 | 04:23 PM
  #11241  
Jett i son's Avatar
escaped
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
Absolutely! I was talking with an FA the other who said the company is eager to get all the contracts finished up.....turns out they can't merge with open contracts..that should tell you something.
Spot on flyingpuma1: they can't merge with open contracts

Open contracts are a liability, especially for a fast growing, stock market favorite, like our company.
We are an investor "darling", any uncertainty diminishes Spirit's market valuation.
This is key in negotiations.
We would be foolish to give away any of our advantages.
Time is on our side!

The MEC must get the message that we are willing to wait for the best possible outcome.

Last edited by Jett i son; 04-05-2015 at 04:53 PM.
Old 04-06-2015 | 09:54 AM
  #11242  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Follow up to the jumpseat thing, all 178 seats were full. The listing I made online Spirit's website as a OAL Jumpseat was still only showing as a non-rev. They made it clear that the flight was full. I mentioned being a CASS approved pilot, so the gate agent gave me a jumpseat form. I filled it out and got on (thank you to the crew).

For the future, if a flight is full, is it worth listing online? It just seems to make us a non-rev. If we jumpseat it seems like there is a paper form we have to fill out any way. What do you prefer? Do both methods? (I only ask because at some airlines, it's frowned to end up listing on a flight as both a non-rev and a jumpseater).
This is the way I see it:
DO list online for jumpseat, anytime the jumpseat is already listed for your listing will default to non-rev just because the system won't allow more bodies than seats, also I think you can check in online, this way it is easier for the gate agent to get your details. When you get to the gate DO ask for and fill out the JS form and have them CASS you, the pilots are "encouraged" to make sure every JS-er has the form regardless of cabin or cockpit seat assignment. We are encouraged to check to make sure we leave no-one behind, if you have an issue try to get our attention.
There is NO issue with being nonrev and JS at Spirit, it is the way it "works".
Let me know if this isn't correct!
Old 04-06-2015 | 01:32 PM
  #11243  
Android's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rainbows
We could merge with anyone, frontier, allegiant, even alaska. Even a legacy carrier it don't matter. United and continental was a merger many didn't see coming as well as american and usair same as southwest and airtran. Southwest was suppose to buy frontier that didn't happen and they got bought by republic and then indigo anything can happen. The point is without protection we are sitting ducks like the airtran guys. One thing we can count on is we wont be buying anyone we are shedding and outsourcing our ground people. It makes a lot of sense for us to watch out for ourselves I think ALPA will do a decent job for us if it's any ALPA carrier, except maybe delta, but if it's American or southwest we are on our own. And protection doesn't cost the company a thing.
The Airtran pilots were not sitting ducks. They failed to use the rules to their advantage. SWA and SWAPA outclassed them. What happened is that they chickened out.
Old 04-06-2015 | 01:37 PM
  #11244  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,347
Likes: 329
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
This is the way I see it:
DO list online for jumpseat, anytime the jumpseat is already listed for your listing will default to non-rev just because the system won't allow more bodies than seats, also I think you can check in online, this way it is easier for the gate agent to get your details. When you get to the gate DO ask for and fill out the JS form and have them CASS you, the pilots are "encouraged" to make sure every JS-er has the form regardless of cabin or cockpit seat assignment. We are encouraged to check to make sure we leave no-one behind, if you have an issue try to get our attention.
There is NO issue with being nonrev and JS at Spirit, it is the way it "works".
Let me know if this isn't correct!
Thanks! I was the only pilot there for this flight. It all worked out great. In the future I'll continue listing online Spirit. Thank you again.
Old 04-06-2015 | 01:40 PM
  #11245  
Android's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Turbinebound
Did you read the email? They told you why they are taking this approach, and honestly it seems to make sense. I understand that we are in a good position, but so is the company, there is no impetus on their end to sign something. As the email pointed out, every day after the amendable date that we don't have a contract is money taken from our pocket.... that's money the company keeps. So why do we need to drag this out for 7 years over every intricate detail when we have a pretty good base to start from, unless we want to be then next Republic airways.

Furthermore, we all have to vote on this at the end of the day, so if is a giant dog turd, well then guess what? We all get a say...
Yes. Did you? Here's a quiz for you, whats the plan to address the other stuff?
Old 04-06-2015 | 01:42 PM
  #11246  
Android's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Not really, 70% don't care and will vote for a pay cut if the MEC puts their stamp on it.
Hate to agree with this thought, but you're correct.
Old 04-06-2015 | 02:47 PM
  #11247  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
Absolutely! I was talking with an FA the other who said
Best source of information after Fox News.
Old 04-06-2015 | 06:43 PM
  #11248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not saying I believe every word they say, but that is correct that we can't merge with open contracts.
Old 04-06-2015 | 07:18 PM
  #11249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: A320 Left
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
I'm not saying I believe every word they say, but that is correct that we can't merge with open contracts.
I don't think that's correct. Why can't we? It didn't stop US Airways and American.
Old 04-07-2015 | 03:54 AM
  #11250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ManFlex
I don't think that's correct. Why can't we? It didn't stop US Airways and American.
Point taken, but didnt Airways and American have to agree on the new pay scale before the merger? I know the rest of the contract came later. It just makes me wonder what the big push is to get it done faster, I'd rather have gains across the board than just an hourly gain, even if it takes longer.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices