Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2015 | 02:37 PM
  #11141  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 5
From: A320 Left
Default

So with STD coverage how much of the treatment and medication do they cover? 90% right? What if its just a small problem like herpes? I've been googling "examples of bad STDs vs LTDs" all day and I see nothing about pilot contracts. Trying to educate myself for contract 2015. STDs last for longer than 2 years, so this is an important discussion.
Old 03-29-2015 | 03:00 PM
  #11142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade
Dude, you are thick. This damn policy totally sucks but it isn't a l loss of licence policy. They can't force you to go to law or medical school but is does indeed pay till 65. Now I'm done with you.
No they can't force you to go to law or medical school but if you are able to, or able to learn any new skill that replaces 80% of what you were making as a pilot then they don't have to and won't continue to pay you.

If the policy pays til 65 then why does it suck like you say. If it paid til 65 I wouldn't have an issue with it.

Btw, LTD and loss of license (medical certificate) are the same thing in most of the industry. If you've been spending the last two pages trying to illustrate the differences then you are missing the point completely.

I still don't understand why you are making personal attacks. What's your end game?
Old 03-29-2015 | 03:22 PM
  #11143  
Lemonade's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: A 320
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
No they can't force you to go to law or medical school but if you are able to, or able to learn any new skill that replaces 80% of what you were making as a pilot then they don't have to and won't continue to pay you.

If the policy pays til 65 then why does it suck like you say. If it paid til 65 I wouldn't have an issue with it.

Btw, LTD and loss of license (medical certificate) are the same thing in most of the industry. If you've been spending the last two pages trying to illustrate the differences then you are missing the point completely.

I still don't understand why you are making personal attacks. What's your end game?
The problem with our policy is many. 1. It only pays 60% up to $7000. 2. It reduces your payments if you find a lesser job to make up the difference, essentially locking you into $7000 for life with no inflation clause. 3. While I insist they can not withhold payments in support of some fantasy job that pays 80% they do withhold payments to someone that has a law degree or is a partner in some other business that generates income. That is horrible.

My only end game is to make sure we have the facts straight and hold our ALPA reps responsible to distribute that information.
Old 03-29-2015 | 04:11 PM
  #11144  
Lemonade's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: A 320
Default

A critical gain would be to pay for our own policy through a payroll deduction. That would make the proceeds tax free for life. It would be a tough sell to a group that cringes every time they have to cough up a dollar for the van driver but it would be easy to get the money back in other ways.
Old 03-29-2015 | 04:12 PM
  #11145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

We agree for 90% of this so now we can put this to bed ok. You and I have differing information on the age 65 issue which I believe to be huge. Agree to disagree. Done
Old 03-29-2015 | 04:25 PM
  #11146  
willflyforcash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade
Dude, you are thick. This damn policy totally sucks but it isn't a l loss of licence policy. They can't force you to go to law or medical school but is does indeed pay till 65. Now I'm done with you.
Dude, you're pretty rude with your replies. This should be a discussion of finding out the facts, not a ****slinging event. The importance of this wording is huge.

The way I read it supoorts AutoPilot's interpretation. If after two years, you are able to be trained/educated, they stop paying. It's doesn't say you have to actually GO to "law/medical school", you just have to be ABLE TO GO be trained or educated.

In a scenario where you randomly became diabetic or color blind, after two years you are certainly able to be trained/educated.
Old 03-29-2015 | 05:00 PM
  #11147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

The wording would need to read something like this for it to be covered to age 65 like my addict all policy is.

"Due to sickness or injury the insured is considered disabled if unable to perform with reasonable continuity the material and substantial duties of any gainful occupation OR deemed by the FAA to be mentally or physically unfit to fly as a commercial pilot"
Old 03-29-2015 | 05:00 PM
  #11148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Default

I suppose if you are 27 years old and become color blind in you first year at Spirit they might be able to create the 80% scenario. However if you have moved up the captain ladder a bit it is almost impossible to win that argument as an insurance provider for someone that has never done anything else in his life besides fly planes.

Im gonna lean with lemonade on this one even if he is a snot. My biggest gripe is the lack of support from Wheat and certainly Gonsen. Those two are totally MIA.
Old 03-30-2015 | 12:54 PM
  #11149  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
I completely agree with you, what you're saying is true, unless you are completely crippled to the point of getting government disability you won't be receiving ltd after 2 years. I have spent more years than I care to mention dealing with disability as a result of a car hitting me. Anyone who doesn't believe this is welcome to question me about it. Between our crappy ltd and non-existent std it's a scary issue if you have something happen. So now I pay a lot of extra money in coverage to be covered for something that should be in our contract
In a very similar boat here! Agree completely.
Old 03-30-2015 | 12:57 PM
  #11150  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by MATEN308
As someone who is out on LTD now. I can say I will not vote on anything that doesn't address this issue. At my previous job Harvey Watt was used and the process was painless when having to file a claim after an injury. With no short term here, and the current provider I would expect no pay for 4-6 months time. It took 2 months past my elgibility date to receive first payment, and that was with me hounding the provider and doctors. Bottom line you better have some money saved because the sick time goes quick. Just my .02. That's not even addressing the 2 year term which is garbage.

Yeah, me too. I never received anything from LTD until 6 months out. This despite submitting everything they requested on time and when they requested. That left me scrambling to figure out which bills were getting paid and which ones were being put off. Principal is NOT your friend when out on LTD. All they are doing is trying to figure out how NOT to pay you and how to get you off their payments ASAP.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices