Search
Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2013, 08:23 PM
  #5831  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by 319wisperer View Post
Why? We have ACARS, and the few places that it doesn't work, we can use the the stations land line or cellphone, or if off the gate, use a radio patch through the station. Again, it should be on Spirit's dime and time. I don't think I've ever HAD to use my personal cell phone.



While there isn't any guidance about this on the KCM website about when it can and can't be used, I've read local union websites that say its only to be used while on duty, deadheading or commuting.
Nothing gets past you, does it?

:-)
skybolt is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 08:31 PM
  #5832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade View Post
It would reference section 9.2.1of the FOM


 
9.2.1Navigation Charts
A
.009; 121.549

The Captain shall not begin a flight unless the appropriate Jeppesen aeronautical charts are on board. The Company will provide Jeppesen Enroute and Approach Charts to each Pilot. In addition, flight planning and airport analysis documents are maintained in OCC. Responsibility for Jeppesen Revision.: · If a revision is distributed while a Pilot is flying a sequence, the Pilot is not responsible for that revision until returning at the end of that sequence. · If a revision is distributed at the Pilot’s base before departing on a sequence, the Pilot is responsible to have revised pages inserted and/or removed as instructed on the Manual Transmittal Sheet. The revision number must also be logged on the Record of Revisions in the manual for that sequence. Jeppesens must be revised before referencing your charts on the Flight Deck in preparation for pre-flight activities. · If the revision is not in the Pilot’s V-File, the Pilot should check with the base manager to obtain the current revision.

We need to comply with the FOM, right?
You have learned much Grasshopper!
skybolt is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 12:19 AM
  #5833  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 320*****
Posts: 487
Default

Originally Posted by gatorbird View Post
We shouldn't be bargaining for KCM; it benefits the company along with the pilot group.
Way to go junior. You took the one sentence out of the post that had little to do with the post itself. But since you did.

We shouldn't? LOL. Those are phrases for a place that has corporate culture, where managers think it is important to take care of their employees because in return they will take care of their customers. This is not that place. Arguments that start with "we should, or they should" just don't apply here bro.

And why should they btw? No, it does not benefit the company. Like Nedskids said, as long we show up at the gate and push on time they have no incentive to get it. If the MEC wants 100% compliance and enforcement, shouldn't the company expect the same? That is all they are doing. We will give them no slack, they will give us no slack. They give no slack to the passengers either. No slack is the corporate culture here.

But F KCM. I really don't care anymore. It seems I am the only one who thinks that perhaps a few dollars a month from my $2-3k yearly ALPA dues could go for KCM. That way they could not hold it hostage. But the union does not want to hear that. I just wish I could pay for my own. Buying airport friendly shoes cost me more per year than KCM would.

But didn't Joe write in his "Dear John" letter to us that it was coming? I thought I have read that on the ra email. I could be wrong, my eyes were full of tears.
Normann is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 06:36 AM
  #5834  
Gets Weekends Off
 
680crewchief's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Just because the MEL says we can, doesn't mean we should
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade View Post
It would reference section 9.2.1of the FOM


 
9.2.1Navigation Charts
A
.009; 121.549

The Captain shall not begin a flight unless the appropriate Jeppesen aeronautical charts are on board. The Company will provide Jeppesen Enroute and Approach Charts to each Pilot. In addition, flight planning and airport analysis documents are maintained in OCC. Responsibility for Jeppesen Revision.: · If a revision is distributed while a Pilot is flying a sequence, the Pilot is not responsible for that revision until returning at the end of that sequence. · If a revision is distributed at the Pilot’s base before departing on a sequence, the Pilot is responsible to have revised pages inserted and/or removed as instructed on the Manual Transmittal Sheet. The revision number must also be logged on the Record of Revisions in the manual for that sequence. Jeppesens must be revised before referencing your charts on the Flight Deck in preparation for pre-flight activities. · If the revision is not in the Pilot’s V-File, the Pilot should check with the base manager to obtain the current revision.

We need to comply with the FOM, right?
That's hardcore. If that's the case how it's specifically addressed in your FOM, I would say show at scheduled show time and take the delay. Easier said than done; I know there's serious pressure and nobody wants to be the guy sticking their neck out.

What a silly little game.
680crewchief is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 07:41 AM
  #5835  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade View Post
It would reference section 9.2.1of the FOM


 
9.2.1Navigation Charts
A
.009; 121.549

The Captain shall not begin a flight unless the appropriate Jeppesen aeronautical charts are on board. The Company will provide Jeppesen Enroute and Approach Charts to each Pilot. In addition, flight planning and airport analysis documents are maintained in OCC. Responsibility for Jeppesen Revision.: · If a revision is distributed while a Pilot is flying a sequence, the Pilot is not responsible for that revision until returning at the end of that sequence. · If a revision is distributed at the Pilot’s base before departing on a sequence, the Pilot is responsible to have revised pages inserted and/or removed as instructed on the Manual Transmittal Sheet. The revision number must also be logged on the Record of Revisions in the manual for that sequence. Jeppesens must be revised before referencing your charts on the Flight Deck in preparation for pre-flight activities. · If the revision is not in the Pilot’s V-File, the Pilot should check with the base manager to obtain the current revision.

We need to comply with the FOM, right?
Yep, have to comply for company reasons, not FAA reasons.
No CFR says you have to have them in order, or in the book.
And the FOM is an accepted manual, not approved. There's a difference.
Approved manuals are just as regulatory as the CFRs.
Like reading in the cockpit. Nowhere in the CFRs does it state you can't read at cruise. Company policy may state so, but no CFR.
Like at UAL/ CAL now does not prohibit reading...
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 07:58 AM
  #5836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lemonade's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: A 320
Posts: 265
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive View Post
Yep, have to comply for company reasons, not FAA reasons.
No CFR says you have to have them in order, or in the book.
And the FOM is an accepted manual, not approved. There's a difference.
Approved manuals are just as regulatory as the CFRs.
Like reading in the cockpit. Nowhere in the CFRs does it state you can't read at cruise. Company policy may state so, but no CFR.
Like at UAL/ CAL now does not prohibit reading...
If the approved manuals are just as regulatory as the CFRs then we need to do it right?
Seems strange. I wonder if a FA violated the make-up policy in their manual are they in violation of the regs. subject to discipline from the FAA?
Lemonade is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 08:49 AM
  #5837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade View Post
If the approved manuals are just as regulatory as the CFRs then we need to do it right?
Seems strange. I wonder if a FA violated the make-up policy in their manual are they in violation of the regs. subject to discipline from the FAA?
Is it an APPROVED or ACCEPTED manual?
There aren't many APPROVED manuals. Although some POIs think there are.
Weight and balance manual is approved, training manual is approved. GOMs or FOMs, are ACCEPTED.
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 05:02 AM
  #5838  
Gets Weekends Off
 
more windshear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 114
Default

A/C 620 is on its way... Little bit of good news I guess, keep em coming!

Spirit (NK) #9620 Flight Tracker ? FlightAware
more windshear is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 05:21 AM
  #5839  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Sweet, Im looking forward to flying a brand new plane
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 07:53 AM
  #5840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LR45DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A319/320/321
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
Sweet, Im looking forward to flying a brand new plane
The shine will quickly wear off when you have to fly it at night with those new type strobes on the sharklet airplanes. Annoying to say the least.
LR45DRIVER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices