Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2015 | 02:42 PM
  #10831  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Metal Slug
Do you think it could have something to do with in-base pilots on the Standing Availability List per 25 g.2.a.(4) from "Group A" not getting the opportunity to fly open time before pilots from 25 g.2.b.(4) "Group B" are awarded the open trip?

That situation looks like it would have merit, if a Group A pilot with AVL in FLICA had documentation to show evidence of a trip awarded to a Group B pilot on that date.
^^^^^^^ This! Much better said!
Old 02-28-2015 | 03:16 PM
  #10832  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

Looks like the Capt upgrade time is at about 5 years now. It is about to get a whole lot longer too. We will be at the half way mark to 144 planes in two months. Then technically there are no captain seats available for new hires. I would suspect that the company will eventually announce another order. Hope you made it on in time. Not to mention that our pay is way behind industry average. I am sure if things do not go well in August, pilots will be leaving in droves. At least that's what most guys have told me they are waiting to see. Some have already started to leave.
Old 02-28-2015 | 03:30 PM
  #10833  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OpenDes
Looks like the Capt upgrade time is at about 5 years now. It is about to get a whole lot longer too. We will be at the half way mark to 144 planes in two months. Then technically there are no captain seats available for new hires. I would suspect that the company will eventually announce another order. Hope you made it on in time. Not to mention that our pay is way behind industry average. I am sure if things do not go well in August, pilots will be leaving in droves. At least that's what most guys have told me they are waiting to see. Some have already started to leave.
Haha, come on man, thats using the most basic of basic of calculations here. I agree that those hired today are looking at 5 years and you'll need to get hired this year to see an upgrade within the current orders.

But airlines will staff more CAs than FOs and there will be attrition over the next 5 years for pilots who would be able to hold a CA spot in the next 5 years, so it is not as simple as saying "half way"

But I do agree that someone hired today wont see an upgrade in this decade unless more planes are announced.
Old 02-28-2015 | 03:37 PM
  #10834  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

That is a fare assessment. We do not have very many guys retiring though. The days of a fast upgrade are coming to an end. Our upgrade time will be comparable to the legacy airlines before you know it.
Old 02-28-2015 | 04:29 PM
  #10835  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OpenDes
That is a fare assessment.
cue Gringo in 3...2...
Old 02-28-2015 | 05:21 PM
  #10836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OpenDes
That is a fare assessment. We do not have very many guys retiring though. The days of a fast upgrade are coming to an end. Our upgrade time will be comparable to the legacy airlines before you know it.
Friend at Delta is a 7.5 year guy, says he could upgrade in a few months. Delta just announced 190 CA slots. That time will drop, too as they are hiring 100 a month. Soon the Legacys will be at our timeline for upgrades.
Old 02-28-2015 | 05:34 PM
  #10837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Jett i son
Thanks to all who are combating corruption.
Our corrupt congress, sold out to "special interest groups", does not work for us, and cannot get anything done!
No argument here. Both Dems and Repubs are guilty as sin.


Originally Posted by Jett i son
takes action to enjoy the fruits of a great, smiley work environment.
Our work rules are the result of sacrifice and a strike.
In my seemingly continued efforts to keep our MEC power structure unhappy with me…………WRONG. The assertion that our work rules are the result of a strike is just plain WRONG!

"5 days off in a row to the max extent possible, no less than 4" was an existing work rule before we had a CBA.

Transition conflict existed from the first CBA, negotiated in 1998 and ratified early in 1999. (BTW, we had pure conflict bidding in C1999, which was given up in C2003) The "max six days" conflict we have now is better than the C2003 version but still not the original pure conflict.

"No JA" was in the original, C1999, CBA.

The "no jeopardy" commute clause was gained in 2007, outside of contract negotiations, as part of the base closure mitigation negotiations when Spirit announced that they were closing DTW.

Red/Green is a part of the automation section of the scheduling section. As such, it isn't a work rule. The current ability to drop a trip isn't the result of a red/green work rule, it is the result of an overstaffed airline. The actual language regarding "required daily minimum reserve coverage" is found only in the Float Vacation section. And, Section 25.R.4.a.1, allows the company to establish said min coverage based on the companies "experience". This is still a work in progress *

In general, the vast majority of our work rules, QOL, etc were either part of the existing work rules from pre 1999, or were implemented in C1999, or were the result of LOA's made outside of Section 6.

For a bit of trivia, how many of you know why the Spirit pilot group organized in the first place?



*The last I saw from the union, and I may have missed something, …..the arbitrator sent both parties back to the table to decide on some agreeable language that would reflect both parties understanding of this section. This was published in the arbitors opinion of the latest red/green ruling.



Answer to trivia: According one of the guys who was here when I was a new hire, and retired soon after, they organized for merger protection - not because they desired to fight with Ned. This explains why so much of C1999 was simply a formalization of the then existing work rules package.
Old 02-28-2015 | 05:51 PM
  #10838  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

On a completely different note:
http://www.smartcockpit.com/download...18_to_A321.pdf

Here's the book Airbus expects you to have when you learn the bus. Good info, but not official because it's not kept current.
Old 02-28-2015 | 08:14 PM
  #10839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
No argument here. Both Dems and Repubs are guilty as sin.




In my seemingly continued efforts to keep our MEC power structure unhappy with me…………WRONG. The assertion that our work rules are the result of a strike is just plain WRONG!

"5 days off in a row to the max extent possible, no less than 4" was an existing work rule before we had a CBA.

Transition conflict existed from the first CBA, negotiated in 1998 and ratified early in 1999. (BTW, we had pure conflict bidding in C1999, which was given up in C2003) The "max six days" conflict we have now is better than the C2003 version but still not the original pure conflict.

"No JA" was in the original, C1999, CBA.

The "no jeopardy" commute clause was gained in 2007, outside of contract negotiations, as part of the base closure mitigation negotiations when Spirit announced that they were closing DTW.

Red/Green is a part of the automation section of the scheduling section. As such, it isn't a work rule. The current ability to drop a trip isn't the result of a red/green work rule, it is the result of an overstaffed airline. The actual language regarding "required daily minimum reserve coverage" is found only in the Float Vacation section. And, Section 25.R.4.a.1, allows the company to establish said min coverage based on the companies "experience". This is still a work in progress *

In general, the vast majority of our work rules, QOL, etc were either part of the existing work rules from pre 1999, or were implemented in C1999, or were the result of LOA's made outside of Section 6.

For a bit of trivia, how many of you know why the Spirit pilot group organized in the first place?



*The last I saw from the union, and I may have missed something, …..the arbitrator sent both parties back to the table to decide on some agreeable language that would reflect both parties understanding of this section. This was published in the arbitors opinion of the latest red/green ruling.



Answer to trivia: According one of the guys who was here when I was a new hire, and retired soon after, they organized for merger protection - not because they desired to fight with Ned. This explains why so much of C1999 was simply a formalization of the then existing work rules package.
Now that's strange because Matyas told me that he got all that stuff with his 357 Magnum in contract 2010
Old 03-01-2015 | 04:40 AM
  #10840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OpenDes
Looks like the Capt upgrade time is at about 5 years now. It is about to get a whole lot longer too. We will be at the half way mark to 144 planes in two months. Then technically there are no captain seats available for new hires. I would suspect that the company will eventually announce another order. Hope you made it on in time. Not to mention that our pay is way behind industry average. I am sure if things do not go well in August, pilots will be leaving in droves. At least that's what most guys have told me they are waiting to see. Some have already started to leave.
The latest vacancy bid result that posted this week showed the most junior captain as a 9/2012 hire making his time from new hire to award 2.5 years. I'm not saying that it's going to stay that way going forward, it's just that the upgrade is currently not 5 years at present.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices