Search
Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2015, 10:08 AM
  #10331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: A320 captain
Posts: 209
Default

How much will the LOA effect staffing?

I think the general consensus is that we are fat on pilots. Aside from staying ahead of the delivery schedule and our higher than average utilization, how plump are we and how long can it be supported? Spirit will seek cost savings where and when they can. Hypothetically if a "correction" to staffing is required, then its way better to do it now while we have a fat delivery schedule and an aggressive growth plan rather than when economics require furloughs and downgrades. I find that more scary.

...fire at will
TTOCSMCC is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 10:19 AM
  #10332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by TTOCSMCC View Post
How much will the LOA effect staffing?

I think the general consensus is that we are fat on pilots. Aside from staying ahead of the delivery schedule and our higher than average utilization, how plump are we and how long can it be supported? Spirit will seek cost savings where and when they can. Hypothetically if a "correction" to staffing is required, then its way better to do it now while we have a fat delivery schedule and an aggressive growth plan rather than when economics require furloughs and downgrades. I find that more scary.

...fire at will
Nothing has been published officially but the assumption with a little napkin math by some on this forum is that it's about a 1% staffing reduction. That's probably just north of $1 million a year in savings but that number grows as the pilot group grows. The number of dollars is not so much of importance to us as the number of pilots. I also think my numbers are quite conservative.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 11:18 AM
  #10333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
onalandline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A-320 Series
Posts: 145
Default

If this LOA allows the company to become more efficient and save money, then so be it. It helps us out too. I'd rather see minor course corrections along the way than a major one down the road. I'd rather make more money out of a solid contract with proper pay rates and other compensation, than having to work outside my line utilizing company inefficiencies to make more money. We should not have to rely on those inefficiences. They will slowly disappear. The LOA may not be perfect, but you get 5 hours pay per day, can utilize your EFB on your work days, and not have to eat up additional days off going to training twice for what should be one event. I may be crazy, but that is how I see it.
onalandline is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:16 PM
  #10334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

I just hope you're not 10 numbers away from upgrade when the music stops or worse commuting indefinitely because you can't hold the base you live in.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:27 PM
  #10335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gonyon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by onalandline View Post
If this LOA allows the company to become more efficient and save money, then so be it. It helps us out too. I'd rather see minor course corrections along the way than a major one down the road. I'd rather make more money out of a solid contract with proper pay rates and other compensation, than having to work outside my line utilizing company inefficiencies to make more money. We should not have to rely on those inefficiences. They will slowly disappear.
I wholeheartedly agree. I would like to work my shift, go home and get my pay. I have no desire to surf Flica all day and bid crappy lines in hope of a transition conflict just to make an ok pay check that is still way behind a UAL reserve pilot at my longevity step
gonyon is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:30 PM
  #10336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gonyon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
The latest FAQ sent out by SPA109 is a fair assessment. Clearly shows pluses and POSSIBLE minuses. What it doesn't say is that if passed the loa will require a lower staffing requirement. It does say that pilots on min days off will now receive 5hrs training day instead of having training put on a previously scheduled work day. Lower staffing requirement. Slower upgrades, slower advancement to domicile of your choice. Someone on the list will be just a handful of numbers away from their seat or domicile of choice when the list stagnates. Without this loa they would be in it. Hope that's not you. Now that's a real scare tactic
lets fire this off to the powers that be and get it answered then
gonyon is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:32 PM
  #10337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

It's not a question. It's a statement. There's nothing to fire off. The FAQ was good. They just didn't spell out the words staffing reduction.

Btw I agree with you guys on working a line and not having to "work the system" to make money. This is about staffing nothing else. That affects your relative seniority. It's not about money in this case.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 01:52 PM
  #10338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 715
Default

Originally Posted by onalandline View Post
If this LOA allows the company to become more efficient and save money, then so be it. It helps us out too. I'd rather see minor course corrections along the way than a major one down the road. I'd rather make more money out of a solid contract with proper pay rates and other compensation, than having to work outside my line utilizing company inefficiencies to make more money. We should not have to rely on those inefficiences. They will slowly disappear. The LOA may not be perfect, but you get 5 hours pay per day, can utilize your EFB on your work days, and not have to eat up additional days off going to training twice for what should be one event. I may be crazy, but that is how I see it.
Sounds like you'd fit in at AA. I'd rather not give the company 'efficiencies'. You're entitled to your opinion, but it sounds like you're ready to march down the road to PBS et al. Not having to work hard is why I like it at Spirit. If we turn this place into any other airline, I may as well go to Delta. Like it or not, we're unlikely to match them in total compensation next time around.
ManFlex is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 02:22 PM
  #10339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
onalandline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A-320 Series
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
I just hope you're not 10 numbers away from upgrade when the music stops or worse commuting indefinitely because you can't hold the base you live in.
Please explain exactly how this LOA will lead to this.
onalandline is offline  
Old 02-04-2015, 02:23 PM
  #10340  
Gets Weekends Off
 
onalandline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A-320 Series
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by ManFlex View Post
Sounds like you'd fit in at AA. I'd rather not give the company 'efficiencies'. You're entitled to your opinion, but it sounds like you're ready to march down the road to PBS et al. Not having to work hard is why I like it at Spirit. If we turn this place into any other airline, I may as well go to Delta. Like it or not, we're unlikely to match them in total compensation next time around.
I am far from that road. I just try to see the bigger picture, and pick my battles.
onalandline is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices