Search
Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2016, 12:58 PM
  #5031  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by Rainbows View Post
Interesting question. I have no idea about railroads, but I wonder if they have a national seniority system or anything that would allow national rates.
They probably have a union. Pilots have an association. Big difference. Imagine if Alpa could negotiate a 320 pilot rate and any union shop had to pay that rate to operate a 320?
full of luv is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 01:02 PM
  #5032  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 513
Default

Originally Posted by UncleVito View Post
Why do you think rls not going to happen? Sure, not tomorrow, but a couple years, why not?
F---- that. Is anyone really planning on sticking around a FEW YEARS for a contract? There is ZERO reason why this can't be done by August
VegassBus is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 02:34 PM
  #5033  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Default

Originally Posted by 390SetBlue View Post
We fly the same equipment in the same environment with more seats and orchestrate the operation at every f'n station... We should be paid more! Have some self worth. Who cares what crap they serve in the cabin? It doesn't matter

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Listen chief, NO WHERE did I advocate not trying everything possible nor accepting less than we deserve. Keep it mature and impersonal, please.
sgt98c is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 02:59 PM
  #5034  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by UncleVito View Post
Why do you think rls not going to happen? Sure, not tomorrow, but a couple years, why not?
I doubt anyone will get rls again..F allegiant can't even get released....if it did happen it would be more than a couple yrs..
IAJETCAPT is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 04:13 PM
  #5035  
Gets Weekends Off
 
390SetBlue's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by sgt98c View Post
Listen chief, NO WHERE did I advocate not trying everything possible nor accepting less than we deserve. Keep it mature and impersonal, please.
My apologies. Just wound up. I want us to be compensated as well as our peers. I don't think branding matters for compensation purposes. Why not compare margins? That's more realistic to me. Just my opinion.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
390SetBlue is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 04:35 PM
  #5036  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Gunga Din View Post
I'm not suggesting they negotiate on a public forum. I'm not even suggesting they update us on a weekly or monthly basis. But how about you tell us what you're asking for?

Just tell us please that your asking for current (soon to be old) united rates. Tell us if you're asking for a DC and a 401k match north of 12%.
Or should they burn 3 more years of our time only to find they started with JB rates and a 10% 401k match.
Not sure how many times I have to say it but a match of any kind is hurting us. YOU DO NOT WANT A MATCH. You want a defined contribution.

Let's go with your 12% hybrid match/DC example with a 9% match and say you make $250k.

9% of $200k is $18k (your personal max) the company matches that $18k. They also give another 3% on that money in DC which is $6k. So what happens to the other $50k in earnings you made? You maxed out your match so instead of getting 12% ($6k) on that $50k you are only getting 3% ($1500). You left $4500 in retirement funds on the table because instead of a straight DC plan you had a hybrid plan. You thought you were getting 12% but you got 10.2% in reality.

If our rates go where they should be this will be a problem for every single ca and many fos if we have a hybrid plan with such high matching. You want pure DC and you can contribute if you want or take your 9% money back in your paycheck
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 05:03 PM
  #5037  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
Default

Can't agree more with Qotsaautopilot. A DC of 3-6% is far more beneficial than a matching, no matter how high, especially at the current IRS limits.
Lobaeux is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:37 PM
  #5038  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
Not sure how many times I have to say it but a match of any kind is hurting us. YOU DO NOT WANT A MATCH. You want a defined contribution.

Let's go with your 12% hybrid match/DC example with a 9% match and say you make $250k.

9% of $200k is $18k (your personal max) the company matches that $18k. They also give another 3% on that money in DC which is $6k. So what happens to the other $50k in earnings you made? You maxed out your match so instead of getting 12% ($6k) on that $50k you are only getting 3% ($1500). You left $4500 in retirement funds on the table because instead of a straight DC plan you had a hybrid plan. You thought you were getting 12% but you got 10.2% in reality.

If our rates go where they should be this will be a problem for every single ca and many fos if we have a hybrid plan with such high matching. You want pure DC and you can contribute if you want or take your 9% money back in your paycheck


Not quite accurate. Using you numbers 9% match with 3% DC.
You would get 3% on the Entire $250,000. Not just the "remaining "50,000"
$250,000 x .03 = $7500. Spirit would match your $18,000 And an additional $7500 in DC. Add your 18k contribution and That's a healthy $43,500 a year.

16% DC would obviously be cleaner and easier to calculate, but a hybrid can work. For me anyway at least. No matter what it is I will be maxing out my $18,000 no matter what spirit puts in. I wanna lower my taxable income by 18k every single year. Period. I'm single without kids and without a bunch of toys...so having said that I don't mind the hybrid... Simply because I'm gonna max out my contribution as long as the irs will let me.
FlyGuy2002 is online now  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:54 PM
  #5039  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Position: E175
Posts: 27
Default

Does anyone know how long before you hear something back if at all when you take the online assessment or do you still need to go to a job fair and get a face to face.
thanks
STA323 is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 07:01 PM
  #5040  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gonyon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by STA323 View Post
Does anyone know how long before you hear something back if at all when you take the online assessment or do you still need to go to a job fair and get a face to face.

thanks


It varies. For me it was less than an hour. For others a couple weeks. Sorry I wish I had better info
gonyon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
De La Ghetto
Flight Schools and Training
22
11-26-2014 05:41 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
N618FT
Regional
33
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices