Search

Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Doubling the MRJ order???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2018 | 12:51 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by MantisToboggan
Yeah I'm kind of confused on this one....

According to the all knowing wikipedia, Trans States Holdings has orders for 5 MRJ70s and 50 MRJ90s.... how is this possible with current scope agreements?
The orders were placed when everyone predicted the big 4 would cave on scope. They did not and now the orders are in limbo. It costs virtually nothing to place a aircraft order. 10,000 dollars will get you a 777 order. There is little risk in placing orders.
If TSA accepts delivery of a MRJ-90 that is when they will be in violation of their contracts with the majors.
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 04:57 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The orders were placed when everyone predicted the big 4 would cave on scope. They did not and now the orders are in limbo. It costs virtually nothing to place a aircraft order. 10,000 dollars will get you a 777 order. There is little risk in placing orders.
If TSA accepts delivery of a MRJ-90 that is when they will be in violation of their contracts with the majors.
A lot can happen in 3 years!
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 07:09 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2
A lot can happen in 3 years!
Let’s hope for the industry and the profession that nothing changes!
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 10:07 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Default

Seems like it would be a good time to allow an 89K RJ but reduce
the quantity by 30-50%???
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 01:08 PM
  #95  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2
Seems like it would be a good time to allow an 89K RJ but reduce
the quantity by 30-50%???
Not willing to open that door. If flying smaller planes isn't profitable, they should create more mainline jobs. Not our problem
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 06:38 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Let’s hope for the industry and the profession that nothing changes!
Let's just hope you and your buddies at Delta can back up your big talk.
Reply
Old 02-23-2018 | 10:16 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2
Seems like it would be a good time to allow an 89K RJ but reduce
the quantity by 30-50%???
Not going to happen.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 05:56 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
Not going to happen.
If you can predict the future that well please PM me some lotto numbers!
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 05:59 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
So you plan on being a regional pilot for life? Keep in mind you will have a career always at the mercy of the next contract. No one is however trying to take your job. We are however going to hold the line at a migration of additional mainline flying being outsourced. It’s interesting on the one hand you claim we are trying to take your job and another poster right above you claims we dont want to fly those jets. That claim is off course utter BS. We would be happy to have the next generation of smaller jets at the mainline just as we were happy to have the DC-9’s seating the same.
TSA can fly all the MRJ-90’s they want. They just can’t do it while flying contract work for Delta. They agreed to that when they took on those contracts. I believe that AMR and UAL have the same provisions. If we allow that flying at the regionals we cap our future CS100 flying. We are not going to do that short of another chapter 11 filing which seems highly unlikely.
You can say whatever you want but don’t claim that you care about me or my job.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 06:07 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2
Seems like it would be a good time to allow an 89K RJ but reduce
the quantity by 30-50%???
Management would never buy into that. They would just buy more E175’s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilentLurker
Trans States Airlines
8
12-16-2017 04:50 AM
mtsupilot376
Regional
0
07-15-2014 08:09 AM
nyx23
Aviation Law
34
05-01-2012 10:04 AM
jsled
Major
37
12-23-2009 03:42 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices