Search
Notices

UPA amendable date!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2019, 11:14 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver View Post
Maybe you should ask management that when fuel prices spike? How on earth do they fit that change into the completely static pie?

Ridiculous and defeatist.
Well when the market turns the company loses money. They continue to fill the pie even when they have loses unless the events of say another 9/11 trigger the mass contract gives like we saw once before.

I’m not a defeatist I am a realist and if you think there isn’t X amount of dollars that are available then you have an extreme level of lack of knowledge. Based on many of your previous post I don’t believe you to the the paragon of business acumen.
PDRit is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 11:59 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
So we don’t buy more planes and we give bigger raises is how you would achieve this contract based on your example? Please tell me you aren’t on the negotiation committee.

Maybe you can get that pony and the “every Thursday” work day contract you think you need. Perhaps they can negotiate you your own blue cooler bag.
You equate that to buying planes? More like buying mansions. It certainly was interesting to watch the flow of money as we were giving them well north of a billion. Shared sacrifice was the term of the day. Excuse the.... out of me for wanting some of that back.

They can buy all the shiny new jets they want. They don't need me to subsidize it. The lenders will be more than happy if an appropriate rate of return can shown.
Floyd is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 12:02 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
Well when the market turns the company loses money. They continue to fill the pie even when they have loses unless the events of say another 9/11 trigger the mass contract gives like we saw once before.

I’m not a defeatist I am a realist and if you think there isn’t X amount of dollars that are available then you have an extreme level of lack of knowledge. Based on many of your previous post I don’t believe you to the the paragon of business acumen.
Of course there's only X amount of dollars available. The issue arises when their max offer is Y. It's that delta, not the dot. that I want.
Floyd is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 12:12 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by guppie View Post
I believe the latter would work. The 787 could have been an efficient replacement for the 767. And we got PLENTY for that FRMS LOA. We are making 26% more per hour now than the Jan 2017 (end of contract) pay rates. That Delta snap up REALLY paid off!! It was just a 2 year extension that still upped the game in pattern bargaining for pay and furlough protections. The furloughees got their full longevity credit with retro to 2012 (finally). It's no wonder it passed by such a large margin. No brainer.
Placing the 787 on the 767 routes would have been an inefficient use of capital. Then what do you do with the 767s sitting around? All of that would have cost $$. Furlough protections are worth the paper they are written on. The furloughees would have gotten their credit including retro.

I'm not saying the extension wasn't beneficial. It was a roll of the dice.
Floyd is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 03:15 PM
  #95  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
Let's try to simplify this for you.

The UPA amendable date is 1/31/19. The DPA amendable date is 12/31/19 as is the APA's. The UAL MEC just put out a letter signed by every member. Ask the Delta folks how unified their MEC is. United pilots are leading this round of pattern bargaining.
I’ll ask you again, how on earth can you be sure that we’re leading anything? That’s great that our MEC is lockstep with each other but that doesn’t translate into anything other than camaraderie and not an industry leading CBA. We’ve been coatailing for a while now and I hope you’re correct but there’s nothing tangible that backs up your claim.
757Driver is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 03:18 PM
  #96  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
Well when the market turns the company loses money. They continue to fill the pie even when they have loses unless the events of say another 9/11 trigger the mass contract gives like we saw once before.

I’m not a defeatist I am a realist and if you think there isn’t X amount of dollars that are available then you have an extreme level of lack of knowledge. Based on many of your previous post I don’t believe you to the the paragon of business acumen.
Yeah yeah, one of the pie is only so big guys guys that management just salivates over. Any chance that you’ve applied for a recently vacated FODM position?

Hoping you never have anything to do with our upcoming contract talks as your bar lowering comments terrify me.
757Driver is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 04:13 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver View Post
Yeah yeah, one of the pie is only so big guys guys that management just salivates over. Any chance that you’ve applied for a recently vacated FODM position?

Hoping you never have anything to do with our upcoming contract talks as your bar lowering comments terrify me.
Why does someone that has an understanding of how businesses operate have to be a “management guy”? I’m not seeking to lower the bar. But you are the same guy that professes great knowledge on every issue while stepping on your crank on a regular basis. I’m not privy to any information other than a business can only sustain certain cost. We saw that with our C2K. It was doomed on signing day as the corporation didn’t make the money to pay what was promised.

You are the same guy that denigrated new hires. You should ask some of those double furloughees what life was like when they didn’t have this job. Maybe some realism on what the rest of the world goes through in their jobs might help with some perspective. I would always want more money and better quality of life but I need a healthy corporation to provide that. I will trust our negotiation team can find that balance and keep yahoos with bravado and nonsense on the sideline.

Since you had to insult me...are you throwing in your desire for some embroidery wings on the new uniforms?
PDRit is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 07:10 PM
  #98  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
Why does someone that has an understanding of how businesses operate have to be a “management guy”? I’m not seeking to lower the bar. But you are the same guy that professes great knowledge on every issue while stepping on your crank on a regular basis. I’m not privy to any information other than a business can only sustain certain cost. We saw that with our C2K. It was doomed on signing day as the corporation didn’t make the money to pay what was promised.

You are the same guy that denigrated new hires. You should ask some of those double furloughees what life was like when they didn’t have this job. Maybe some realism on what the rest of the world goes through in their jobs might help with some perspective. I would always want more money and better quality of life but I need a healthy corporation to provide that. I will trust our negotiation team can find that balance and keep yahoos with bravado and nonsense on the sideline.

Since you had to insult me...are you throwing in your desire for some embroidery wings on the new uniforms?
News flash, your airline was going to file Chap 11 regardless of what they paid the rank and file. Mismanaged disaster, period and your wages had nothing to do with it. I know you’ll never buy that but sadly that’s how it was.

So much for your business savvy and no, embroidered wings were lame.
757Driver is offline  
Old 02-05-2019, 09:48 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Gotta give Kirby credit for thinking outside the box. Put 50 seats in a CRJ700, scope problem solved & a better product than a CrJ200 & e145. And if UALPA caves on scope, put 70 seats back in them overnight and pull crj200’s back from the desert.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1PV0BF

United to add premium seats on regional and mainline jets
Tracy Rucinski
CHICAGO (Reuters) - United Airlines said on Wednesday it was adding 1,600 premium seats to nearly 250 international and domestic aircraft, including the introduction of a first-class cabin on 50 Bombardier Inc regional jets.

FILE PHOTO: A United Airlines Boeing 767-300ER aircraft takes off from Zurich Airport January 9, 2018. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann/File Photo
The move is part of a push by large U.S. airlines to attract more lucrative premium travelers. Rivals Delta Air Lines Inc and American Airlines Group Inc have also added premium seats, which can fetch at least twice the coach fare.

United’s new regional jet, called the CRJ 550, will be the only 50-seater on the market to offer a first class cabin, the Chicago-based airline said, providing premium travel on connecting flights from small U.S. cities to the rest of the world.

SPONSORED



Under the plan, United will work with Bombardier to use the frame of its current CRJ 70-seat fleet for a new two-cabin, 50-seat configuration with a self-serve beverage and snack station for premium travelers and four storage closets for carry-on bags.

The CRJ 550s will eventually replace United’s current 50-seat regional fleet with a model permitted under its pilots’ contract, which became amenable in January.

While not generating new orders for cash-strapped Bombardier, United’s plan would allow the Canadian plane and train maker to market the new model to other U.S. airlines looking to replace aging regional jets. Bombardier aims to take a decision on its money-losing CRJ regional jet program this year.


On United’s mainline fleet, there will be 50 percent more premium seating on its Boeing 767-300ERs and Airbus A319s, and 33 percent more on its A320s. Following the changes, United will have a total of 167 seats on the 767-300ER, 126 seats on the A319 and 150 on the A320.

Andrew Nocella, chief commercial officer for United, told reporters that “in an era where many airlines are adding seats to the aircraft to crowd more passengers onto the plane,” United is “doing exactly the opposite.”

United said it plans to complete the changes by the end of next year, with the first reconfigured 767 flying between Newark and London.

The new CRJ 550 will be operated by United’s regional partner GoJet out of Chicago and Newark, pending a final agreement and government certification.


Viacom's plunging profit easily beats estimates
Nocella said United’s overall coach footprint would continue to grow despite the new seating configurations thanks to the introduction of larger aircraft like the Boeing 787 to its fleet.
spaaks is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 04:08 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

deleted . . . not meant to go here.
Sunvox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okieskies99
United
4
07-03-2017 11:55 PM
Andy
United
238
06-19-2017 10:44 AM
DR Pilot
United
77
10-25-2011 04:48 PM
KiloAlpha
Regional
51
06-10-2006 01:48 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices