Search
Notices

Contract 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2020, 04:10 PM
  #121  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 6
Default

I dont expect to see a new contract for several years. Will it get contentious? Yes as it always does
Keep is offline  
Old 01-17-2020, 04:43 PM
  #122  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer View Post
Maybe it’s a trial balloon to judge reaction from a certain cross section of the pilot group. Isolate the widebody guys and put the fear of Joint Ventures in their head and saying something needs to be done to protect your seats at the top of the food chain. Tell them how it’s good trade off to protect the highest paying seats by allowing more feed with an unspecified number of 76 or 90 or 100 seat RJs for our Express co-workers. They need these field trips to tailor the next steps of the sales job for a TA that’s probably already done.

I hope I’m wrong. It’s happened once before. �
Keep in mind, a good chunk of those "WB guys" are also very junior FO's (ie.. Post Merger New Hires) on reserve who get the ****ty trips to LHR.

Not saying that a sell job won't come at some point.. but since we don't have a TA in sight (at least, none that we know of), the P2P spin up may (hopefully) be a way to talk to the pilots and "remind" them that we don't have a contract yet even, after 2 yrs of negotiations, and to Fly Smart.
I honestly don't think that there are enough "senior WideBody" guys to sell out scope just so they can stay on the top of the pyramid.

One only has to look over at Delta and see what JV's do.
Please explain to me the scenario where the union puts out a TA that sells out scope on the bottom end while just keeping scope on the top end the same? Makes no sense.

Now, if we had bad scope on the top end and were losing International WideBody flying.. you might have a point. But the exact opposite is true. We have strong scope on the top, and seems on the bottom too.. and we are growing our widebody fleet and our international destinations.
What is this 'Trade off' you speak of?

Seems guys are fishing to why the union is trying to put out comm. And slamming the union for thinking out of the box in a way to get to other pilots besides just meeting in the domiciles. I for one welcome this announcement.
But I too believe we may be a year or 2 away from a TA. Hope I'm wrong but time will tell.

Always
Motch

Oh, and FS, FP & FtC

PS) There is also a fair amount of 75/73 flying that goes to HNL. So it's not a widebody target audience~
horrido27 is offline  
Old 01-17-2020, 05:20 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
Keep in mind, a good chunk of those "WB guys" are also very junior FO's (ie.. Post Merger New Hires) on reserve who get the ****ty trips to LHR.

Not saying that a sell job won't come at some point.. but since we don't have a TA in sight (at least, none that we know of), the P2P spin up may (hopefully) be a way to talk to the pilots and "remind" them that we don't have a contract yet even, after 2 yrs of negotiations, and to Fly Smart.
I honestly don't think that there are enough "senior WideBody" guys to sell out scope just so they can stay on the top of the pyramid.

One only has to look over at Delta and see what JV's do.
Please explain to me the scenario where the union puts out a TA that sells out scope on the bottom end while just keeping scope on the top end the same? Makes no sense.

Now, if we had bad scope on the top end and were losing International WideBody flying.. you might have a point. But the exact opposite is true. We have strong scope on the top, and seems on the bottom too.. and we are growing our widebody fleet and our international destinations.
What is this 'Trade off' you speak of?

Seems guys are fishing to why the union is trying to put out comm. And slamming the union for thinking out of the box in a way to get to other pilots besides just meeting in the domiciles. I for one welcome this announcement.
But I too believe we may be a year or 2 away from a TA. Hope I'm wrong but time will tell.

Always
Motch

Oh, and FS, FP & FtC

PS) There is also a fair amount of 75/73 flying that goes to HNL. So it's not a widebody target audience~

Motch,
I was just thinking out loud. I’m not sure what purpose these roadshows serve considering there is no TA to talk about yet. It’s too late to be telling them what’s important to us. So what is motivating these meetings? I doubt the P2P guys will have much info to offer because they don’t have access to the inside scope. I would love to see their daily reports on how many pilots they had contact with.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 01-17-2020, 06:25 PM
  #124  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer View Post
motch,
i’m not sure what purpose these roadshows serve considering there is no ta to talk about yet. It’s too late to be telling them what’s important to us. So what is motivating these meetings? .

boondoggle
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-17-2020, 06:49 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
boondoggle
and I’m okay with that. Just don’t sell it as anything other than that.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 01-18-2020, 09:16 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Remember, the negotiating committee has just one job: to get a contract passed. And that takes 50% plus one. For me, if there aren’t serious changes to reserve rules and hard stand on scope, it’s a flat out “no”.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 01-18-2020, 11:32 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Remember, the negotiating committee has just one job: to get a contract passed. And that takes 50% plus one. For me, if there aren’t serious changes to reserve rules and hard stand on scope, it’s a flat out “no”.
We wouldn’t be here if the MEC had voted down the last midterm wage deal extending the contract when we had leverage. Unfortunately SFO,LAX,ORD,IAD, DEN, and SEA shot it down 4-9 but EWR,CLE,GUM and IAH loved it and voted 8-1 making it pass by a slim margin.
O2pilot is offline  
Old 01-18-2020, 12:02 PM
  #128  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 234
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Remember, the negotiating committee has just one job: to get a contract passed. And that takes 50% plus one. For me, if there aren’t serious changes to reserve rules and hard stand on scope, it’s a flat out “no”.
I agree. Reserve rules need to be changed. No more rolling days at all for either domestic or global. Hire more pilots if you have to cover flying. My days off are my days off.

But there won’t be jack to vote on for years to come so settle in boys and girls.
IHateYou is offline  
Old 01-18-2020, 02:45 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

I applaud the P2P guys getting the ball rolling. There is a lot of misinformation out on the line, rumors about giving on scope. I think this is an attempt to quash the rumors and put out some facts. Lots of the new guys are getting frustrated with the perceived lack of action. Me too for that matter. It's hard to get information without negotiating in public.

I see one of 2 scenarios:
1. Oscar wants to get the contract done before he leaves--great. Yeah!!
2. I think more probable, Oscar leaves, we go for another couple of years with Kirby spouting relief on scope.

The one saving grace is I hear Kirby doesn't like Parker over at AA, and if we had a decent contract, labor peace, we could really put a hurt on AA competition wise--Since Parker has gone to war with his employees, it'll be pretty bad over there for quite a while. It'll be up to Kirby if we miss this opportunity.

Also, I wouldn't read too much into the outstation P2P guys. My bet is the union is taking advantage of some guys on the wide bodies doing P2P while on trips, and will be at the domiciles later next month.

Not everything is a conspiracy....well maybe....
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 01-18-2020, 03:58 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by O2pilot View Post
We wouldn’t be here if the MEC had voted down the last midterm wage deal extending the contract when we had leverage. Unfortunately SFO,LAX,ORD,IAD, DEN, and SEA shot it down 4-9 but EWR,CLE,GUM and IAH loved it and voted 8-1 making it pass by a slim margin.
Nice thinly veiled legacy dig there. That vote passed the pilots with flying colors so your "blame CAL" narrative fails miserably.

Your passive-aggressive skills are lacking as well, at least have the guts to say what you mean.
Knotcher is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Rascal
JetBlue
20
01-25-2018 01:54 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices