TK Training Throughput?
#51
All right, after seeing some of the inputs during the course of this thread I've taken a fresh hack at what throughput the TK might be able to achieve. For example, I'll assume only 4 sim periods per day due to extra cleaning. I'll assume the average qual course requires 9 FFS events rather than 7 (meaning most guys will need a full qual course of 10 rides instead of a 7 ride RQ-3). I'll go with 60% qual and 40% CQ, although I think CQ events may drop considerably for the next nine months (seeing as about 1000 out of 3000 current NB CAs will not need CQ after 22 May). One thing I have not tried to guess at is how many FFSs may or may not be required to cover FTD events.
Here's what I come up with:
737 - 2.4 crews per day, so about 72 per month and 288 crews trained by 1 Oct.
Bus - 1.6 crews per day, about 48 per month and 192 by 1 Oct.
These revised numbers are still on the high side compared to what Ugleeual hung out there earlier in this thread (PI insight of 55/mo 737, 37/mo Bus). But I expect the true monthly number will fall somewhere between the 55-72 range (737) and 37-48 (Bus). Seatbelt sign on...
Here's what I come up with:
737 - 2.4 crews per day, so about 72 per month and 288 crews trained by 1 Oct.
Bus - 1.6 crews per day, about 48 per month and 192 by 1 Oct.
These revised numbers are still on the high side compared to what Ugleeual hung out there earlier in this thread (PI insight of 55/mo 737, 37/mo Bus). But I expect the true monthly number will fall somewhere between the 55-72 range (737) and 37-48 (Bus). Seatbelt sign on...
#52
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
How does this work if we are down 50-60-70% in October? If demand isn’t remotely close to their planned 30% reduction number, what difference does it make if crews don’t get trained if they aren’t needed? They could still announce a big furlough, train people likely to survive, and then just cancel furloughs this fall if they come up short. If they don’t fall short they can announce another displacement/furlough and start the whole thing over. They are going to need to cut payroll significantly this fall, and my money says that they will find a way to make it work. Sure hope that I’m wrong, but this displacement is just the beginning of what is to come unless things recover dramatically.
#53
How does this work if we are down 50-60-70% in October? If demand isn’t remotely close to their planned 30% reduction number, what difference does it make if crews don’t get trained if they aren’t needed? They could still announce a big furlough, train people likely to survive, and then just cancel furloughs this fall if they come up short. If they don’t fall short they can announce another displacement/furlough and start the whole thing over. They are going to need to cut payroll significantly this fall, and my money says that they will find a way to make it work. Sure hope that I’m wrong, but this displacement is just the beginning of what is to come unless things recover dramatically.
im not sure what you seniority is but go look at what % you would sit as a NB FO. If they cut 4000 on OCT 1 there will be literally 18 FOs left on the bus in SFO and 12 in EWR. CAs can’t fly in the left seat they will have to train or force all the flying into DEN and IAH since there will be FOs there.
I can try to figure out the numbers later(unless someone else wants to do it) but my bet is that SFO/LAX/ORD/EWR/DCA combined have less than 100 FOs senior to 4000 on the bus. The 737 is better but not by much considering how much larger that fleet is.
#54
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
im not sure what you seniority is but go look at what % you would sit as a NB FO. If they cut 4000 on OCT 1 there will be literally 18 FOs left on the bus in SFO and 12 in EWR. CAs can’t fly in the left seat they will have to train or force all the flying into DEN and IAH since there will be FOs there.
I can try to figure out the numbers later(unless someone else wants to do it) but my bet is that SFO/LAX/ORD/EWR/DCA combined have less than 100 FOs senior to 4000 on the bus. The 737 is better but not by much considering how much larger that fleet is.
I can try to figure out the numbers later(unless someone else wants to do it) but my bet is that SFO/LAX/ORD/EWR/DCA combined have less than 100 FOs senior to 4000 on the bus. The 737 is better but not by much considering how much larger that fleet is.
#55
I really don’t expect them to cut 4,000 (made up big number) on October 1, but I think it will be a significant number, and that they could get there pretty quick if they wanted to. The lower the demand, the bigger cut they can make. More senior bases like IAH and DEN can be significantly reduced and displace people to other bases. At the end of the day, where there is a will, there is a way. The contract slows them down, but they are going to do what they want to do.
i don’t think 4000 will happen either but everyone thinks it’s easy to just drop thousands so I’m showing why it is hard. 3900 furloughs takes out every single post merger hire since NOV 2012 that’s why I picked it.
i will be shocked if we furlough more than 2500 unless we’re still below 50% by January.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
I won't be shocked by any furlough number; small or big. One or many rounds of furloughs.
As far as TK training, the 320/737 training is probably going to be almost exclusively 2 FOs for a while.
As far as TK training, the 320/737 training is probably going to be almost exclusively 2 FOs for a while.
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
im not sure what you seniority is but go look at what % you would sit as a NB FO. If they cut 4000 on OCT 1 there will be literally 18 FOs left on the bus in SFO and 12 in EWR. CAs can’t fly in the left seat they will have to train or force all the flying into DEN and IAH since there will be FOs there.
I can try to figure out the numbers later(unless someone else wants to do it) but my bet is that SFO/LAX/ORD/EWR/DCA combined have less than 100 FOs senior to 4000 on the bus. The 737 is better but not by much considering how much larger that fleet is.
I can try to figure out the numbers later(unless someone else wants to do it) but my bet is that SFO/LAX/ORD/EWR/DCA combined have less than 100 FOs senior to 4000 on the bus. The 737 is better but not by much considering how much larger that fleet is.
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Although I don’t see 4000 cuts, but if they did that’s likely 125ish instructors, and other management pilots. Would they even get that many from the line to replace them? Many may not want to replace a furloughee job, or move to Denver. Im not sure how some would feel about filling a job only made empty by a furlough of a union brother or sister.
#60
1) Pilots can't be bumped into instructor jobs
2) The training footprint for instructors is significantly longer to become fully qualified
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



