Search
Notices

SK wants Concessions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2020, 12:02 PM
  #171  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by rvfanatic View Post
Great point on the captains that already displaced to FO taking a significant cut already. However, your assumption that a furlough would still happen is just that, an assumption. SK has already said they would prefer the flexibility of having the staffing ready when demand returns. I’m guessing there’s a threshold where they would be comfortable paying more in benefits etc to retain the bounce back capabilities of full staffing if we agreed to lowering our hours worked and paid.
If Kirby wants to keep people around to be able to bounce back, he already has that ability in our contract. They can stay fat in various categories and offer as many SRL’s as they need until demand recovers. If he was really open to a temporary solution that wasn’t detrimental to the pilot group, our union would have let us know by now.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 01:07 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
If Kirby wants to keep people around to be able to bounce back, he already has that ability in our contract. They can stay fat in various categories and offer as many SRL’s as they need until demand recovers. If he was really open to a temporary solution that wasn’t detrimental to the pilot group, our union would have let us know by now.
THIS!! Now is not the time to try and make the wheel rounder.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 01:23 PM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by rvfanatic View Post
Great point on the captains that already displaced to FO taking a significant cut already. However, your assumption that a furlough would still happen is just that, an assumption. SK has already said they would prefer the flexibility of having the staffing ready when demand returns. I’m guessing there’s a threshold where they would be comfortable paying more in benefits etc to retain the bounce back capabilities of full staffing if we agreed to lowering our hours worked and paid.
So what counts more, Kirby’s words “We want flexibility if things return” or his actions, a massive displacement.

The displacement, and people already being scheduled for training takes away that ability to bounce back.

I’m going to go with Kirby’s actions, and not his words.
O2pilot is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 01:34 PM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dumpcheck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 126
Default

And everyone who wants to voluntarily work less to save the company cash can use these current provisions:
1) Take COLA/E-COLA (incl. every other month or partial month COLA).
2) Bid minimum credit and/or drop trips (plenty of reserve coverage now).
3) Take SRL, though this doesn’t save as much.

If you’re not actively participating in these options, you have no business pushing reductions on others. I have been reducing my hours regularly for years...following our current contract.
dumpcheck is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 01:46 PM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16 View Post
Junebug82 is a Commutair pilot (2019 hire i think) and Aviate candidate.
That fast track career just got hit with a delay.
FPLD
guppie is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 04:57 PM
  #176  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 55
Default

Those of you who are resorting to attacking me personally, you're only highlighting the weakness of your position and your inability to defend it. If you don't like what I'm saying, then dispute it with something relevant to the discussion. I've simply asked a few relevant questions and shared a few thoughts in a respectful way. And the response from some has been to say I am a fool, I am a management plant, I cut the line, I haven't paid my dues, I don't get it, I haven't been furloughed enough times, I am divisive, I am inexperienced. You all are making yourselves and our profession look bad with this behavior. How can we expect to be respected if we can't even demonstrate the ability to have a respectful discussion like adults.

Also, nobody is required to work for a specific employer, see X amount of furloughs or have X amount of fight hours to earn the right to share an opinion or ask a sincere question on a public message board (although if I shared my resume the he-cut-the-line crowd would be disappointed). And those who seem to know so much about Aviate, please reach out to me on PM if you are sincerely interested in what Aviate actually is. There is obviously a serious misunderstanding about the program, and I am happy to chat with anyone who is interested in the truth about it.

Thanks to all who have answered my questions and shared your own personal perspectives on this topic. There are clearly some deeply-held and emotional opinions about this, and I can understand why given the history. Regardless of how this specific issue ends up playing out, I wish you all the best and pray these dark times are over sooner than we all expect.
JUNEBUG82 is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 05:40 PM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,611
Default

Option B... they can ignore your posts and you’ll probably go away.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:10 PM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by JUNEBUG82 View Post
Those of you who are resorting to attacking me personally, you're only highlighting the weakness of your position and your inability to defend it. If you don't like what I'm saying, then dispute it with something relevant to the discussion. I've simply asked a few relevant questions and shared a few thoughts in a respectful way. And the response from some has been to say I am a fool, I am a management plant, I cut the line, I haven't paid my dues, I don't get it, I haven't been furloughed enough times, I am divisive, I am inexperienced. You all are making yourselves and our profession look bad with this behavior. How can we expect to be respected if we can't even demonstrate the ability to have a respectful discussion like adults.

Also, nobody is required to work for a specific employer, see X amount of furloughs or have X amount of fight hours to earn the right to share an opinion or ask a sincere question on a public message board (although if I shared my resume the he-cut-the-line crowd would be disappointed). And those who seem to know so much about Aviate, please reach out to me on PM if you are sincerely interested in what Aviate actually is. There is obviously a serious misunderstanding about the program, and I am happy to chat with anyone who is interested in the truth about it.

Thanks to all who have answered my questions and shared your own personal perspectives on this topic. There are clearly some deeply-held and emotional opinions about this, and I can understand why given the history. Regardless of how this specific issue ends up playing out, I wish you all the best and pray these dark times are over sooner than we all expect.
I didn't attack you - I simply added context to your position. If you'll notice my profile lists my position - EWR 320 Captain. Part of the problem with anonymous forums like this we miss this context if it's not shared. Frankly your opinion and views mean jack shti since you're not a United pilot and you won't get a vote if a TA is presented.

I hope the big asterisk I put next to your name helps others assess your inputs. As to your moral curiosity I will simply tell you this. Before you dip your toe into an issue it's a good idea to understand what you're talking about. If you want to offer an opinion on how some other pilot group can 'change' their contract - you should go look at and LEARN that contract. Anything less makes your musings even more meaningless. FWIW, I think it's even more egregious that UNITED PILOTS posting here apparently haven't bothered to open our contract and look at the very things they're advocating changing.

Regarding Aviate, it's a management program at this point so I don't really have much concern about it. It's intended to provide a pipeline of pilots in the future. When you show up in new hire class you'll be welcomed as a United pilot.

It's not the fact that you haven't been furloughed that leads me to disregard your lobbying. I was hired by United in Jan 97 and have never been furloughed. The difference is that I EXPERIENCED the labor/management dynamic, I LISTENED to people who had more experience, I've seen firsthand how management treats agreements with our pilot group, and I DON'T PRETEND to be smarter than everyone else on the forum. You simply don't know the culture of United Airlines and so far you seem aggressively determined to NOT LEARN IT from those who do. I hope your personality doesn't mirror what I get from you here because you will rub a LOT of us the wrong way.

I'll entertain you for a minute. Here's how it works. Right now our ALPA reps and designated committee members are interacting with management representatives to either consider management requests, offer ideas of our own, or both. It is only during this process that we (ALPA) will learn what agreements the company is willing to make. Foot stomper - this is the CRITICAL ISSUE. If the company is willing to make an acceptable agreement then it will presented to the MEC for a vote to see if they accept the agreement. They will then vote on whether it should go to member ratification (~materially affects pay or working conditions~). Only then will we be able to decide whether we (Active United pilots) will agree or not. Everything up to that point is, well, pointless. It's mental, typed, public masturbation. Only when an agreement is put before the membership is it appropriate to debate the pros/cons, details, pitfalls, etc... The deal is done at that point and can't be changed by the company. Right now any discussion could possible shape the conditions and terms of a companies proposal.

The correct way for a pilot to shape the ALPA position is to CONTACT YOUR LEC OFFICERS since COVID is preventing council meetings/resolutions. I've contacted my rep by phone, text, and email and have shared my thoughts. Every United pilot should do the same. We've been asked by our MEC to not negotiate in public (which is what is going on here), but pilots who know better still won't stop. You don't know better since you didn't get an email from the UAL MEC for obvious reasons. Myself and others have tried to politely explain this to you, but you still resist.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 06-01-2020, 10:28 PM
  #179  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
Everyone should be able to live on ~20% below guarantee. If you can’t, you’re doing it wrong.
We shall see if the union puts your idea up for a vote. And whatever the voting result ends up being, I'll support it.

Irrespective of that, you are clueless about my finances and financial obligations, so spare me the lecture about what YOU think I should be able to live on.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 03:31 AM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
We shall see if the union puts your idea up for a vote. And whatever the voting result ends up being, I'll support it.

Irrespective of that, you are clueless about my finances and financial obligations, so spare me the lecture about what YOU think I should be able to live on.
^^^^This^^^
You don't know me dude. Some of us have been digging out of craters (i.e. two furloughs) for a long time and are just now filling them in. You have no idea what my obligations are. So speak for yourself iahflyer
mattc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigtime209
Envoy Airlines
55
07-15-2019 07:00 PM
Flea Bite
Major
10
05-15-2015 01:19 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
05-26-2005 03:25 PM
SWAjet
Major
3
03-11-2005 10:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices