Search

Notices

UAL Vaccination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2021 | 03:48 AM
  #291  
drywhitetoast's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 568
Likes: 30
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by SloNLow
After the president’s rant on a door-to-door vaccination/information campaign, I’m now against the jab 100%. How bizarre can this get? It’s available around the corner at CVS if I choose to get it. Geez.
Old 07-07-2021 | 04:39 AM
  #292  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
I’m not saying there aren’t any actual Covid deaths. I know they exist. I’m saying the actual recorded data doesn’t jive with the total numbers. Several confirmed states (if not all of them) have admitted that they have counted car accidents and drug overdoses, etc. as covid deaths. If they then go and take away those covid deaths and add them to the drug overdose column… but the national CDC covid death numbers stay the same… then how in anyway does that sound like we’re getting accurate numbers? That means the legit drug overdose numbers are being added to the legit covid numbers plus the original covid numbers that were corrected for drug overdose.

If the U.K. has officially admitted they’ve double counted deaths because of this same reason… what makes you think the CDC is immune to such discrepancies. Especially when they have a vested interested in keeping the numbers high?
excess deaths don’t consider the cause of death, so moving a death from one column to another doesn’t affect the number of death certificates issued.
Old 07-07-2021 | 04:41 AM
  #293  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
if several states covid death numbers one day go down 25%. And the total National number continues to rise at the same rate… How else do you explain that? The only way for that to happen is if the states that didn’t correct their data had a spike of an extra 25% in covid deaths at the same time the other states decrease. I mean, maybe I should start buying some scratch offs if you believe that seems perfectly normal?
I’m not certain of the lag time and data processes involved in excess death counts, but since excess death isn’t an issue of causality, I’m not sure it would be affected.

the OP asked for data about where all the deaths were. The answer is: right there in the excess death data. But if you have another suggestion on what suddenly caused a huge increase in total deaths in the US in 2020 and early 2021, I’m all ears
Old 07-07-2021 | 06:39 AM
  #294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
I’m not certain of the lag time and data processes involved in excess death counts, but since excess death isn’t an issue of causality, I’m not sure it would be affected.

the OP asked for data about where all the deaths were. The answer is: right there in the excess death data. But if you have another suggestion on what suddenly caused a huge increase in total deaths in the US in 2020 and early 2021, I’m all ears
I get what you’re saying. But when another developed country has made the same mistake and the CDC can’t even do a simple update by subtracting a covid death when they correct it to a drug overdose, then I get a little skeptical. These numbers also basically dictated how we’ve been running the country for a year and a half,

If you have a good explanation on why I should believe an organization that can’t even update one of the most simplest and easily one of the most important data points, is telling the truth about everything else… I’m all ears.
Old 07-07-2021 | 08:54 AM
  #295  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
If you have a good explanation on why I should believe an organization that can’t even update one of the most simplest and easily one of the most important data points, is telling the truth about everything else… I’m all ears.
Maybe you can clarify how many COVID deaths you believe have been miscounted. I think most people accept that there will be clerical errors & discrepancies with how cause of death is assessed; and that the daily numbers we see on Google are generally not as accurate as surveys a year from now might be. But understand today’s numbers could be off by nearly 20% and STILL represent 500K COVID deaths- making it the 3rd most common cause of death in the US last year.

I wouldn’t think to claim the CDC is free from political & financial pressures, or that it’s otherwise beyond reproach, but it would take a MASSIVE coordinated malfeasance of reporting (like over 90%) to make COVID less than a top ten killer in 2020. I can’t tell if you understand this & are being intentionally vague, or if you’re all in on the conspiracy theory. Care to ballpark how many reported COVID deaths you believe to be legitimate?
Old 07-07-2021 | 09:15 AM
  #296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Retired from UAL
Default

Man you can’t argue with an anti vax conspiracy theorists! You know that. Who cares precisely how many died and continue to die from COVID. It’s a big number no matter how you count them. Any healthy person that refuses this shot is off their proverbial rocker. Enough said.
Old 07-07-2021 | 09:21 AM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Maybe you can clarify how many COVID deaths you believe have been miscounted. I think most people accept that there will be clerical errors & discrepancies with how cause of death is assessed; and that the daily numbers we see on Google are generally not as accurate as surveys a year from now might be. But understand today’s numbers could be off by nearly 20% and STILL represent 500K COVID deaths- making it the 3rd most common cause of death in the US last year.

I wouldn’t think to claim the CDC is free from political & financial pressures, or that it’s otherwise beyond reproach, but it would take a MASSIVE coordinated malfeasance of reporting (like over 90%) to make COVID less than a top ten killer in 2020. I can’t tell if you understand this & are being intentionally vague, or if you’re all in on the conspiracy theory. Care to ballpark how many reported COVID deaths you believe to be legitimate?
States and cities that have corrected only for OBVIOUS cases like overdose, murders, and suicides have reduced their numbers by 25%. If they’ve gone down that much for deaths that generally make up a small percentage of total deaths then your guess is as good as mine for all the other causes as well. If they go down 25% for just those causes you’re actually a conspiracy theorist if you think the “official” total CDC numbers are anywhere close to accurate.
Old 07-07-2021 | 09:33 AM
  #298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jtbost
Man you can’t argue with an anti vax conspiracy theorists! You know that. Who cares precisely how many died and continue to die from COVID. It’s a big number no matter how you count them. Any healthy person that refuses this shot is off their proverbial rocker. Enough said.
The director of the CDC has said school aged children are 10 times more likely to die of influenza compared to Covid. Are parents that don’t force their kids to get a flu shot every year off their rocker? Are you one of those parents that are ok with their kids going to school during flu season which is 10 times more deadly for children, but then are scared to let them go to school because of covid?
Old 07-07-2021 | 10:13 AM
  #299  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
The director of the CDC has said school aged children are 10 times more likely to die of influenza compared to Covid. Are parents that don’t force their kids to get a flu shot every year off their rocker? Are you one of those parents that are ok with their kids going to school during flu season which is 10 times more deadly for children, but then are scared to let them go to school because of covid?
Yeah, jtbost is a *******lib**** but he won’t talk anymore , probably, he’s “said enough “ apparently
Old 07-07-2021 | 11:06 AM
  #300  
flightmedic01's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Reclining
Default

Originally Posted by jtbost
Man you can’t argue with an anti vax conspiracy theorists! You know that. Who cares precisely how many died and continue to die from COVID. It’s a big number no matter how you count them. Any healthy person that refuses this shot is off their proverbial rocker. Enough said.
The reason is if you are under the age of 18, you have a 99.997% chance of survival with NO TREATMENT. And if you’re between the ages of 18 and 45, you have a 99.95% of survival with NO TREATMENT (all CDC data). Currently there are numerous COVID treatment protocols that will basically reduce that infinitesimal risk to near zero. So I ask you, why would a healthy person take an experimental mRNA vaccine for a virus that presents almost no risk to them?? It comes down to personal choice.

Last edited by flightmedic01; 07-07-2021 at 11:25 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fortyeight
Republic Airways
203
09-23-2018 06:28 PM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
49
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices