Let’s get some things straightened out regarding these “variants”. COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-Cov-2 virus. According to researchers, This virus is 78% similar to the original SARS-Cov-1 virus that was around in the early 2000s. Early on in the pandemic, because of its similarities researchers wanted to see if people that had gotten infected with, and recovered from SARS-Cov-1 still had any antibodies/natural immunity from the current SARS-Cov-2 strain. So they examined blood samples from some of these people and discovered that yes they did have antibodies/immunity from SARS-Cov-2. Now fast forward to the current situation with some of these variants of SARS-Cov-2 (ie Delta variant). According to a former Phizer VP and molecular biologist, these variants are no more than 0.3% different than the original strain. Said another way, its 99.7% similar. So, the next obvious question is: If someone that had SARS-Cov-1, which is 78% similar to the SARS-Cov-2, still retains natural immunity, then how can someone with a vaccine against SARS-Cov-2 not be protected from a variant that is 99.7% similar to the original strain??? That doesn’t make sense. Then the only question left to ask is: Why isn’t the vaccine protecting someone from a variant that is only 0.3% different?? My conclusion from that information is that this EUA vaccine is not performing the way it was intended. My conclusions are just that, mine. But you can read this information and form your own opinion.

 

Yeah… so we can plus up the number of “super spreader” individuals with increased viral loads to infect even more people. AKA, the vaccinated.


Two years ago, I bet you would’ve been outraged at the idea of treating healthy people with no symptoms as if they were diseased and forcing an experimental product on them that only reduces symptoms.

Look at you now, cheering it on due to 24/7 propaganda and fear based conditioning. I bet you haven’t had control of your own critical thinking skills your entire adult life.

 

Vaccines do not prevent variants.

​​​​​COViD is not something we can control. It will not go away.

COVID risk can be reduced with vaccination, proper treatment of those infected and good general health.

The new response is total hysteria.

 

Yes! Thank you! Your conclusions, with what appears to be a HS biology class under your belt, are only yours. They are not shared by anyone in the scientific/medical community. I’m glad you understand that. And ‘forming your own opinion’ based on incomplete data and a complete lack of understanding of virology is not how the scientific method works.

 

Here is your original quote with my emphasis added;

"It did NOT come from a Wuhan lab. There has been NO absolute proof where it came from. None. You are dealing out lies. I could say the virus came from you and I have the same amount of proof."

At this point to say or suggest there is "NO absolute proof..." pointing to Wuhan or China more broadly is absurd. There is serious talk about that, the lab included. If you're asking for a final report put out by "top men" at this point, especially given the socio political hot potato this is, you're a fool.

 

They are shared by many healthcare professionals and researchers. Just not the ones you are reading. Try these: Dr. Peter McCullough (vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center), Dr. Vladimir Zelenko ( a board certified family physician and nominated for the Nobel Prize for his successful treatment of COVID patients) and Michael Yeadon, Ph.D (a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer).

This information isn’t coming from my “HS biology class”. I fully realize that I may not have a full grasp of virology, but I’m pretty sure these people understand it more than the both of us.

 

Sounds about right. A cardiologist, family medicine and life science researcher constitute "many" researchers for you. I had trouble finding a single peer-reviewed article and/or study that any of these three produced. Have you read any? I don't mean Rudy Giuliani's endorsement of Zelenko, but an actual published article. Also, wasn't Zelenko the one who prescribed patients an untested and unproven cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc. So you will take this cocktail, but not a vaccine?

 

Let’s get one more thing straightened out. No company named Phizer ever made a vaccine. But I’m sure your other details are rock solid.

 

Of course, you attack the individuals instead of the information. Have you read anything these people have published?? (Although Google/YouTube probably pulled it). I could have listed many more, but I figured you can type information into a search engine other than Google. And hell yeah I’d take that “cocktail”!! He’s shown that it works!! But you wont hear that in the MSM because that doesn’t fit the narrative of getting a shot in every arm. All three of those medications/supplements you mention are proven safe over decades of studies. This vaccine hasn’t been proven safe in 1 year of studies. It only has EUA for those over 12 years of age. You do realize that the EUA would be revoked if there is a proven therapy that works as well as, or better than the vaccine???? Censorship is a real thing going on in the MSM right now. Hydroxychloroquin and Ivermectin are super cheap. Vaccines will bring in BILLIONS. Just follow the money.

 

It was a typo from autocorrect you dumbass. PFIZER!! Feel better now?!? SMH