Search
Notices

UAL Reserve Rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2022, 06:01 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

I detest the fact that we have FSBs, but they have a place in our operation. Especially on a Global Fleet with preflight testing for Covid being necessary to enter the country. If a pilot tests positive and there’s not a FSB, it’ll take a minimum of 2.5 hours to fill that position with a SC. If it’s single augmented or a double augment with little head room, now the flight has to be completely re-crewed. Just something to think about…

The biggest problem with our reserve rules it there are no limits on SCs and FSBs. This has to be changed and also when said SCs and FSBs are built. There can’t be a middle of the day SC built and no one is aware of it. If they do something like that, it needs to cost them!!!
DashTrash is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 07:01 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,326
Default

Make FSB worth it to actually BID for it.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 02:45 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
Make FSB worth it to actually BID for it.
Create FSB lines that have a premium pay or extra days off incentive. Then put a limit scheduling's ability to assign a normal reserve to FSB unless the FSB has been used that day, and give the converted reserve an extra 3hrs of pay per each day of FSB that they don't fly when they are filling in for the guy who got awarded FSB initially.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 05:08 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
If it’s single augmented or a double augment with little head room, now the flight has to be completely re-crewed.
Exactly. I don’t think everyone realizes how expensive getting rid of FSB would be to negotiate. It’s not just that each time a flight is now delayed 2+ hours waiting for a reserve, but now United has to often pay 3-4 additional pilots for the entire trip in scenarios like this. What would we be willing to give up to get that?

United has more widebodies than American and Delta combined. Therefore this situation comes up way more here way more than at American and Delta, which is why we have FSB. Personally I’d rather have way more widebody international flying with FSB than having much less widebody international flying at American and Delta but without FSB.

I agree it should pay something, but I completely disagree that it should go away.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 07:43 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,315
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
Make FSB worth it to actually BID for it.
Exactly. I live close enough to the airport that for the right amount of add pay, I’d be picking them up regularly. Commuters wouldn’t be hassled & the company maintains utilization. We avoid delays & cancellations which is good for everyone. Win, win, win.

Problem is not that it exists, but the incentive structure is all off. First 2 for free, plus you’re limited to how many you can pick up aggressively. Then if you end up flying you lose the add pay. Nobody is volunteering for that.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 08:38 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
Exactly. I don’t think everyone realizes how expensive getting rid of FSB would be to negotiate. It’s not just that each time a flight is now delayed 2+ hours waiting for a reserve, but now United has to often pay 3-4 additional pilots for the entire trip in scenarios like this. What would we be willing to give up to get that?



United has more widebodies than American and Delta combined. Therefore this situation comes up way more here way more than at American and Delta, which is why we have FSB. Personally I’d rather have way more widebody international flying with FSB than having much less widebody international flying at American and Delta but without FSB.



I agree it should pay something, but I completely disagree that it should go away.
If FSB is a solution to an augmented flight problem, then make FSB global reserve only.

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
elmetal is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 09:33 AM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Jersey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Banned
Posts: 92
Default

FSB needs to be gone
Jersey is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 10:16 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
If FSB is a solution to an augmented flight problem, then make FSB global reserve only.

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
I mean, all fleets are about to be global anyway, soooo…
Wilfortina is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 10:23 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by Wilfortina View Post
I mean, all fleets are about to be global anyway, soooo…
Don't disagree.

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
elmetal is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 06:51 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by Wilfortina View Post
I mean, all fleets are about to be global anyway, soooo…
then make it that FSB can only be used for global trips
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
AxlF16
United
82
05-13-2020 02:31 PM
CommutAirSarah
CommutAir
17
02-18-2019 06:28 AM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices