Search

Notices

Road to TA2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2022 | 03:23 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
The RHA is the ultimate Tax Trifecta. It’s tax free money going in, (unless you’re a WB CA or raking in PP you can adjust your 401 deferrals to minimize or eliminate spillage), grows 100% tax free and no tax bill on withdraw. How you can not want that available is crazy. I pray the NC isn’t so short sighted that they want to get rid of it.

How Much Does Health Care Cost in Retirement?

According to a report by HealthView Services Financial, a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring in 2021 can expect to spend more than $662,000 for retirement health care costs.


https://www.annuity.org/retirement/health-care-costs/
No way...my parents are 90 neither spent mor the 25k since retirement...625k really that's almost the cost of Steve Austin...I call BS
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 04:33 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
No way...my parents are 90 neither spent mor the 25k since retirement...625k really that's almost the cost of Steve Austin...I call BS
You’re out of touch your parents are luckier than others. I know some spending over $15k/month out of pocket.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 04:41 AM
  #53  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 164
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
No way...my parents are 90 neither spent mor the 25k since retirement...625k really that's almost the cost of Steve Austin...I call BS
Well, a website promoting annuities probably has some incentive to inflate future expenses. The quote below is literally copied and pages from the source that article cited for those costs. While this seems much more reasonable than $625k, I would like to see both the mean and median numbers and how the cost distribution looks. Some percentage of people are going to have really low cost (like your parents) and some on the other end are going to have some really exorbitant expenses. The best any of us can do is make informed planning assumptions based on research, your own health history and risk tolerance.

Total lifetime health care costs for a healthy 65-year-old couple* retiring this year are projected to be
$387,644 in today’s dollars ($572,960 in future dollars). This includes premiums for Medicare Parts
B and D, supplemental insurance (Mediagap), and dental insurance, as well as out-of-pocket costs
related to hospitalization, doctor visits, tests, prescriptions drugs, hearing services, hearing aids, vision,
and dental.
*Average projected life expectancy of 87 for the male, 89 for the female
http://testing.hvsfinancial.com/hvsf...t-Planning.pdf
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 04:46 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
PRAP overages to the paycheck are a terrible idea unless you like paying a crap load more in taxes.
Should be an option to health acct or a check.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 05:20 AM
  #55  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 164
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
Should be an option to health acct or a check.
Or some other tax advantaged option. Options are good, forcing any one choice on everyone will cause an unnecessary split in support.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 06:25 AM
  #56  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

Originally Posted by UASCOMPILOT
No way...my parents are 90 neither spent mor the 25k since retirement...625k really that's almost the cost of Steve Austin...I call BS

Basically I would agree. However, there is a big "but". None the less, I'm not a fan of what I perceive to be over hyping of the RHA.

In the last 3 decades I have been intimately involved in the final care costs for my grandmother, my mother-in-law, my father, my wife's sister's mother-in-law, and my mother. Two of these people had personal resources in excess of $3mil and the other 3 ended up on Medicaid (state paid nursing home care).

The big bills started when the individual reached a point where they stopped being able to do 3 of the basic 6 activities: feeding, bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, and walking. I realize a sample of 5 is small but I think the point is relevant none the less.

Tragically as more and more of us reach extreme old age there are more and more of us who reach a point where these 6 basic tasks become impossible. Now some people are lucky and have family members who are able and willing to assist, but for those individuals without familial helpers the end becomes life in a nursing home, and THAT is outrageously expensive. But here's the thing. It doesn't really matter whether you have $5 mil or $500k in the bank at that time. The difference between most "high end" nursing homes and the "average" nursing home is minimal. If you have the means to pay upwards of $10k a month you your family will pick the nursing home of their choice, but if you have $500k you'll still be able to pick th home, but it will be one on the list that accepts Medicaid because once the $500k is exhausted you'll simply stay where you are on the state's dime. Of course the quality of the institution can vary state to state by a wide margin. In the end though whether your RHA has $200k or $20k won't make a lick of difference because if you hit a point of "high" medical bills it will be REALLY high and not something any RHA will take care of.

Bottom line: "Normal" medical bills are well covered by existing plans. It is the end-of-life bills that skew this number, and an RHA won't take care of those type of bills.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 07:23 AM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
Should be an option to health acct or a check.
Ideally yes, each individual should be able to make their own choice for overages. However I’m not sure the law allows for such an option.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 07:52 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by JTwift
the Tumi TA somehow made our reserve worse. 6am start vs 10am, etc.

The company updates talk about the new “improvements”, but it’s just undoing the bad changes from the Tumi TA, which put us right back where we currently are.

There have been emails from the new Union reps addressing this very thing, though. They’re aware it’s just moving the goalposts back where they were originally.

I still can’t vote, but I was quite happy with all the union rep recalls. That TA1 was bad.
Thank you for staying engaged and involved. The company hopes to hire a new generation of “unjaded” pilots who they can mold to be the company “yes men/women” that my generation never was, and for good reason when one understands our history. Reading posts like yours give me hope that our profession will be in good hands.
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 07:57 AM
  #59  
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by FlewNavy
The reserve "improvements" were not concrete changes to how reserve works at United with the exception of making Day 1 report EARLIER (concession). The changes in TA1 were to monetize certain pilot behaviors which would in theory increase everyones quality of life. AKA - some pilots define QOL by big paychecks and the contract provided avenues for reserves to get more but it did not concretely improve QOL to everyone. It was a contract based on gambling.
Yes! A contract based on gambling, and carve outs for certain groups. In other words, the antithesis of being in a Union. Glad we finally woke up to see the company scheme for what it is. Divide and conquer, and marginalize ALPA. The rejection of TA 1 is the first step to getting the train back on the tracks. We can’t stop paying attention. The road ahead may get bumpy, so buckle up!
Reply
Old 11-17-2022 | 11:03 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 42
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
The RHA is the ultimate Tax Trifecta. It’s tax free money going in, (unless you’re a WB CA or raking in PP you can adjust your 401 deferrals to minimize or eliminate spillage), grows 100% tax free and no tax bill on withdraw. How you can not want that available is crazy. I pray the NC isn’t so short sighted that they want to get rid of it.

How Much Does Health Care Cost in Retirement?

According to a report by HealthView Services Financial, a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring in 2021 can expect to spend more than $662,000 for retirement health care costs.


https://www.annuity.org/retirement/health-care-costs/
Unfortunately unspent money doesn’t get passed on when the employee and eligible spouse die. It goes back to the company.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rama04
Regional
9
12-06-2012 07:57 AM
Pilot36
Pilot Health
7
05-31-2012 09:12 AM
fdxdispatchguy
Cargo
28
10-19-2011 02:37 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 01:12 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 01:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices