Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Here Come the Widebodies >

Here Come the Widebodies

Search

Notices

Here Come the Widebodies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2022 | 07:07 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
359 is a direct 772 replacement, 351k is a 773.

Closest the 787 gets to the 777 is the -10 variant and it’s only close, still doesn’t have the lift.
Fully agree. Other aircraft can definitely carry more, but we don’t know the numbers for actual cost vs revenue. We said that the 777 could never do what the 747 did, but airlines still phased the 747 out. Comparing the 747/777 and the 350/787 isn’t exactly apples to apples, but it’s just to make a point. I’d love to see our WB fleet consist of 787’s and 350’s, but it’s the bean counters that make those decisions. From a non-bean counter perspective, I’d like to see a 787 order to replace the 767 since the 797 isn’t going to happen, and a 350 order to replace our aging 777 fleet. The Max and Neo can replace the 757 and we’d have a pretty efficient fleet.
Reply
Old 12-04-2022 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
359 is a direct 772 replacement, 351k is a 773.

Closest the 787 gets to the 777 is the -10 variant and it’s only close, still doesn’t have the lift.
They're working on a more capable 787-10

https://leehamnews.com/2022/01/05/hotr-boeing-works-on-hgw-787-10-and-the-787-9/
Reply
Old 12-04-2022 | 10:07 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Fully agree. Other aircraft can definitely carry more, but we don’t know the numbers for actual cost vs revenue. We said that the 777 could never do what the 747 did, but airlines still phased the 747 out. Comparing the 747/777 and the 350/787 isn’t exactly apples to apples, but it’s just to make a point. I’d love to see our WB fleet consist of 787’s and 350’s, but it’s the bean counters that make those decisions. From a non-bean counter perspective, I’d like to see a 787 order to replace the 767 since the 797 isn’t going to happen, and a 350 order to replace our aging 777 fleet. The Max and Neo can replace the 757 and we’d have a pretty efficient fleet.
From a risk mgmt standpoint, putting all your eggs in a single fleet brings a lot of risk. Multiply that risk by the dumpster fire Boeing has become.
Reply
Old 12-04-2022 | 10:44 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
From a risk mgmt standpoint, putting all your eggs in a single fleet brings a lot of risk. Multiply that risk by the dumpster fire Boeing has become.

it’s not a single fleet - maybe a single manufacturer.

others seem to do just fine with a single manufacturer … SWA, Frontier, Spirit etc

and dumpster fires are usually good for steep discounts. I wouldn’t be surprised if we paid not much more for many MAX’s than some ERJ175
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 01:23 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 926
Likes: 19
From: B777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
I’d suspect that the crew rest in the A350 isn’t going to be an issue.

I beg to differ. If it’s in violation of our contract then they can’t operate the aircraft period! You do realize that when UAL took delivery of the 747-400 they had to park them because there was no negotiated rate for the 747-400.

If we buy the A350 and if my info is correct. Then we have more leverage and never just put that aside. Time for us at United to raise the bar and stop relying on DAL to do so for us. It’s our turn!
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 01:23 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD;[url=tel:3543792
3543792[/url]]it’s not a single fleet - maybe a single manufacturer.

others seem to do just fine with a single manufacturer … SWA, Frontier, Spirit etc

and dumpster fires are usually good for steep discounts. I wouldn’t be surprised if we paid not much more for many MAX’s than some ERJ175
Even cheaper when you don’t have to make payments on them for a couple of years because they’re grounded. (That includes the 787’s we’ve been waiting on that couldn’t be delivered because of “defects.”)

Hell if dumpster fire = cheap = win in your book, we should’ve been buying Sukhoi Superjets.
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 02:51 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
I beg to differ. If it’s in violation of our contract then they can’t operate the aircraft period! You do realize that when UAL took delivery of the 747-400 they had to park them because there was no negotiated rate for the 747-400.

If we buy the A350 and if my info is correct. Then we have more leverage and never just put that aside. Time for us at United to raise the bar and stop relying on DAL to do so for us. It’s our turn!
I meant that it won’t be an issue if they never show up.
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 03:02 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
From a risk mgmt standpoint, putting all your eggs in a single fleet brings a lot of risk. Multiply that risk by the dumpster fire Boeing has become.
I agree, but we don’t have a say in what they purchase, only what we get paid to fly it. I’d rather have hundreds of NEO’s on the way instead of the Max, but they went in another direction. The dumpster fire at Boeing has probably resulted in aircraft prices that would make management giddy and tilt the cost/reward ratio towards the 787 unless Airbus digs really deep to land the order. Just APC speculation though.
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 03:23 AM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 926
Likes: 19
From: B777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
I meant that it won’t be an issue if they never show up.
Understood. However still a good opportunity to educate others about our potential leverage and UAL ALPA history.
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 10:07 PM
  #40  
Bestglide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
From: 756 left...
Default

The unofficial rumor is 200 787s to make it one fleet type to replace the 767s and 777s.
making the fleet more efficient.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
H60 DUSTOFF
JetBlue
1590
07-01-2022 03:10 PM
FangsF15
Delta
609
10-08-2020 09:43 AM
goldfinger
Cargo
797
03-23-2018 09:19 AM
MarineHarrier
Major
131
02-02-2018 10:35 AM
iahflyr
Cargo
2
06-03-2015 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices