Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Aviate Requirements Lowered >

Aviate Requirements Lowered

Search

Notices

Aviate Requirements Lowered

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2023 | 12:55 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 476
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
I agree with much of your post and was not saying that military pilots are perfect. I was replying to the message about the 2000 hour pilot made earlier. The point was to illustrate that the rigor in military flight training and civilian flight training are universes apart, and that the comparison wasn’t apt. It was not intended to say that military pilots are perfect or civilian pilots are weak.
Understood. My post wasn’t meant to be a put down on military pilots either, just to be clear. Having said all that, I’ve always envied the training that military guys get. It’s highly structured, highly demanding and you’re getting the training from IP’s that want to be there and want to teach. It’s almost the opposite in the civilian world. You have to deal with CFI’s who aren’t vested in teaching, don’t care about student development and are just padding their logbooks, don’t do any table talk or ground school and just want to ‘go fly.’ And on top of all that you’re paying for it. They’re not all like that but many of them are and it was frustrating when I was up and coming on my ratings. I certainly wish we had a training program on the civilian side that mimics the military’s, but there’s just no way to come up with the resources or funding for something like that.

A lot of times civilians are left to their own devices without enough mentorship or guidance between 0-1500 hours. I had a few former military pilots who were excellent mentors/instructors. One was helping me get my CFII. The other provided some high quality training to myself and other CFI’s in a cirrus (CSIP instructor). He was good. I can’t say that about the majority of civilian instructors I’ve had.
Reply
Old 03-07-2023 | 05:20 PM
  #32  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

All in all the changes appear formulated to ensure Mesa can remain in business. And if Mesa remains in business, they can continue to operate for Kirby as the lowest cost RJ provider.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 12:16 PM
  #33  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 54
Likes: 4
Default

can someone describe what it means in chapter 4 "Aviate Complicane"

"Performance measurements will be based on a Participant’s five years of service
immediately prior to transitioning to United, or such shorter period of service as United may
determine in its sole discretion"

If you dont meet some thing(s) in the compliance list, and they see that is was way past you, say 4 years ago instead of 5, and you've improved since then... they can waive it to 4 years instead of 5?
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 01:00 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 421
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by LearJetRadek
can someone describe what it means in chapter 4 "Aviate Complicane"

"Performance measurements will be based on a Participant’s five years of service
immediately prior to transitioning to United, or such shorter period of service as United may
determine in its sole discretion"

If you dont meet some thing(s) in the compliance list, and they see that is was way past you, say 4 years ago instead of 5, and you've improved since then... they can waive it to 4 years instead of 5?
That’s pretty much what I think they mean. For example, 5 years ago you failed a check ride and then a week later or so you failed the re check. That’s too many failures and you can’t go to United. However, you haven’t failed anything since then and your managers have nothing but great things to say about you so they decide that 4 years is good enough in your case and since you have zero failures in 4 years you’re good to go. In other words, United makes the rules and United can change the rules at any time for any reason.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 03:09 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
All in all the changes appear formulated to ensure Mesa can remain in business. And if Mesa remains in business, they can continue to operate for Kirby as the lowest cost RJ provider.
Pretty sure Mesa is NOT the lowest-cost RJ provider.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 04:33 PM
  #36  
pacificapt's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by killbilly
Pretty sure Mesa is NOT the lowest-cost RJ provider.
Pretty sure they are.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 05:36 PM
  #37  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by pacificapt
Pretty sure they are.
Air Wisconsin?
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 05:59 PM
  #38  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Imapylot
In other words, United makes the rules and United can change the rules at any time for any reason.
This. The book says that United can make the rules better or worse at any time. It also says United can dump the entire program at any time without warning.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 08:15 PM
  #39  
hslightnin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: EMB145
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
This. The book says that United can make the rules better or worse at any time. It also says United can dump the entire program at any time without warning.
this is like revision 10 to Aviate. Plan on more changes.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 08:34 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot4000
How do you guys feel about someone in the left seat of a C-17 with 500 hours total?
Left seat of a C-17 doesn’t mean qualified as an Aircraft Commander. The qualifications are different than left seat for 121. 500 hours is low time for military and civilian. What are should asking?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trigg41
Cargo
160
08-04-2014 12:36 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
MikeF16
Career Questions
22
07-25-2013 03:26 AM
hypoxia
Aviation Law
6
07-16-2013 05:19 AM
icarosF1
Foreign
34
09-05-2010 07:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices