United to reduce regional flying
#141
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 445
Likes: 91
What’s with the obsession about asking folks if they built time at a regional? Are you changing the argument since the facts don’t support your original claim?
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
#142
What’s with the obsession about asking folks if they built time at a regional? Are you changing the argument since the facts don’t support your original claim?
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
#143
What’s with the obsession about asking folks if they built time at a regional? Are you changing the argument since the facts don’t support your original claim?
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
BTW I flew on a 550 this morning and it reminded me yet again, what a subpar experience it delivers to our customers.
#145
No, I never flew at a regional. Did 7 years ACMI abroad, commuting to the US, 8 years 91k, and 11 years ULCC. Now at UAL. At no point in my life have I applied to a regional in the US.
#146
Sure did. From 2000-2007. Had an ATP since 1999. Flew the ATR, SF3, CRJ-700 and EMJ-135/140/145 for a wholly owned company. With scope and contract provisions in place, I flew with furloughed AA pilots after 9/11. You think scope wasn’t an issue? LOL
With the Lost Decade in full effect, I went corporate for 2007-2015 flying Citations part 91, when I then was hired by WN.
Our pilot contract has the benchmark on scope. We don’t contract, nor do we have a regional.
Your scope arguments don’t hold any water. This is a business contract we operate under—one I will picket for and walk the line for. And did, with UAL pilots, no less.
With the Lost Decade in full effect, I went corporate for 2007-2015 flying Citations part 91, when I then was hired by WN.
Our pilot contract has the benchmark on scope. We don’t contract, nor do we have a regional.
Your scope arguments don’t hold any water. This is a business contract we operate under—one I will picket for and walk the line for. And did, with UAL pilots, no less.
#147
Sure did. From 2000-2007. Had an ATP since 1999. Flew the ATR, SF3, CRJ-700 and EMJ-135/140/145 for a wholly owned company. With scope and contract provisions in place, I flew with furloughed AA pilots after 9/11. You think scope wasn’t an issue? LOL
With the Lost Decade in full effect, I went corporate for 2007-2015 flying Citations part 91, when I then was hired by WN.
Our pilot contract has the benchmark on scope. We don’t contract, nor do we have a regional.
Your scope arguments don’t hold any water. This is a business contract we operate under—one I will picket for and walk the line for. And did, with UAL pilots, no less.
With the Lost Decade in full effect, I went corporate for 2007-2015 flying Citations part 91, when I then was hired by WN.
Our pilot contract has the benchmark on scope. We don’t contract, nor do we have a regional.
Your scope arguments don’t hold any water. This is a business contract we operate under—one I will picket for and walk the line for. And did, with UAL pilots, no less.
Last edited by LizzyBorden; 11-02-2024 at 06:37 PM.
#148
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 57
#150
I have no idea what the argument since I haven’t been following the discussion, but pointing out your MO. Everyone at that AA thread, including you, settled for personal threats instead of facts. Stuff of sore losers lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fireman0174
Major
4
02-20-2007 11:27 AM



