Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United to reduce regional flying >

United to reduce regional flying

Search

Notices

United to reduce regional flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2024 | 06:03 AM
  #101  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 151
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden
Help me out here...which United Express carrier just finally wrapped up being babysat by the FAA?
The audit with No findings? At least we haven’t had one of our pilots try to crash a plane into our HQ. Also wasn’t it an ex SkyWest pilot that is now in jail for stalking and posting porn of his ex girlfriend? Maybe instead of the FAA you guys need a team psychiatrists to baby sit you.

Why do I suspect you are on my jumpseat defense list from the great jumpseat war of 2019?

You do a great job of confirming the myth about SkyWest pilots.
Old 11-01-2024 | 06:25 AM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Midsomer
The audit with No findings? At least we haven’t had one of our pilots try to crash a plane into our HQ. Also wasn’t it an ex SkyWest pilot that is now in jail for stalking and posting porn of his ex girlfriend? Maybe instead of the FAA you guys need a team psychiatrists to baby sit you.

Why do I suspect you are on my jumpseat defense list from the great jumpseat war of 2019?

You do a great job of confirming the myth about SkyWest pilots.
ha I have history with both those people. Flew with Brian about 2 weeks before he went super crazy and did what he did. Told me he was an officer doing Special Forces. Turns out he was a cook. The guy in Jail I’ve known since college.

I was at SkyWest myself, and I can definitely say the vast majority of guy were awesome guys to fly with, but the closer you got to St.George/SLC, the crazier the people got.
Old 11-01-2024 | 06:33 AM
  #103  
khergan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 657
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden
I work because I need something to do with my time, not because I need to. Plus gives me time to spend with people I have become great friends with.
My logic years ago with smart decision making is what makes sense.
Clearly logic isn't your strong suit. If you are as independently wealthy as you claim, flying CRJs to BFE for regional pay doesn't jive with that.

But hey, if working harder for less money is what suits you, have fun. You won't convince anyone around here that it makes sense, though.
Old 11-01-2024 | 07:02 AM
  #104  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 526
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden
I work because I need something to do with my time, not because I need to. Plus gives me time to spend with people I have become great friends with.
My logic years ago with smart decision making is what makes sense.
The fact that you feel the need to jump on an anonymous web forum and boast about your financial security...tells all of us that you are, in fact, very insecure. The people who actually have achieved security don't have a need to publicly congratulate themselves on their success.

Plus, it's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. And that is, should regional airlines do more, less, or no flying under the United logo? You won't find very many United pilots who would answer "more." Especially those who spent a decade or more at the regionals, but were motivated and competent enough to move up to mainline. I realize that in the past, some senior United pilots gladly voted for scope concessions in return for higher pay at mainline, but those people are mostly retiring. A new set of pilots is taking those seats, and these pilots have learned from the mistakes of the past.

If it was up to me, we'd bring all regional flying in-house.. We'd retire the Deuce, and offer customers a premium experience via the -550 and the 175. We'd offer preferential interviews to all current regional pilots flying for UAX carriers (as opposed to the no-interview flow through that GoJet and Republic pilots currently get, not to mention the metering of Skywest pilots that most definitely is a reality). Of course, the pay rates for those aircraft at mainline would be commensurate with their size. The current UAX regionals would shrink dramatically, and mainline would grow accordingly.

It's not up to me, of course, so this is highly unlikely to happen. But if you're in this forum to either boast about your financial security, or try to convince mainline pilots that the Mormon Air Force should do more flying under United colors...I don't think you'll find your time to be very well spent.

Last edited by Turbosina; 11-01-2024 at 07:13 AM.
Old 11-01-2024 | 07:06 AM
  #105  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 526
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden
Yup, I remember that too.
Remember North Bend? That CA was on everybody's bid avoid list and had no business in a 121 flight deck. 37 feet lower and I don't think Skywest would exist anymore. Or College Station? Need I go on?
Old 11-01-2024 | 07:38 AM
  #106  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 151
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina

I realize that in the past, some pretty senior United pilots would have gladly voted for scope concessions in return for higher pay at mainline, but those people are mostly retiring. A new set of pilots is taking those seats, and these pilots have learned from the mistakes of the past.
.
You are still new at United and flying with junior pilots on the 737. Many who weren’t around in the late 90’s when the changes were made. This version of events in your description is very wrong on what the “senior” did in regards to scope. We fixed the problem but it took a long time.


Old 11-01-2024 | 07:48 AM
  #107  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 526
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Midsomer
You are still new at United and flying with junior pilots on the 737. Many who weren’t around in the late 90’s when the changes were made. This version of events in your description is very wrong on what the “senior” did in regards to scope. We fixed the problem but it took a long time.
Fair enough... So how would you describe those events? Genuine question, not trying to be snarky.
Old 11-01-2024 | 02:44 PM
  #108  
LizzyBorden's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 646
Likes: 3
From: Clappin' Rip Bombs
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Clearly logic isn't your strong suit. If you are as independently wealthy as you claim, flying CRJs to BFE for regional pay doesn't jive with that.

But hey, if working harder for less money is what suits you, have fun. You won't convince anyone around here that it makes sense, though.
I dont work hard at all...well, my logic has done just fine for me. Better off than you are.
Old 11-01-2024 | 02:48 PM
  #109  
LizzyBorden's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 646
Likes: 3
From: Clappin' Rip Bombs
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
The fact that you feel the need to jump on an anonymous web forum and boast about your financial security...tells all of us that you are, in fact, very insecure. The people who actually have achieved security don't have a need to publicly congratulate themselves on their success.

Plus, it's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. And that is, should regional airlines do more, less, or no flying under the United logo? You won't find very many United pilots who would answer "more." Especially those who spent a decade or more at the regionals, but were motivated and competent enough to move up to mainline. I realize that in the past, some senior United pilots gladly voted for scope concessions in return for higher pay at mainline, but those people are mostly retiring. A new set of pilots is taking those seats, and these pilots have learned from the mistakes of the past.

If it was up to me, we'd bring all regional flying in-house.. We'd retire the Deuce, and offer customers a premium experience via the -550 and the 175. We'd offer preferential interviews to all current regional pilots flying for UAX carriers (as opposed to the no-interview flow through that GoJet and Republic pilots currently get, not to mention the metering of Skywest pilots that most definitely is a reality). Of course, the pay rates for those aircraft at mainline would be commensurate with their size. The current UAX regionals would shrink dramatically, and mainline would grow accordingly.

It's not up to me, of course, so this is highly unlikely to happen. But if you're in this forum to either boast about your financial security, or try to convince mainline pilots that the Mormon Air Force should do more flying under United colors...I don't think you'll find your time to be very well spent.
Well, news flash...what you believe or dont believe doesnt change reality. Also you need something to do with your free time. Writing novels on forums isnt exactly time well spent. Oh and Ill try real hard to lose sleep over your thoughts and opinions.
Old 11-01-2024 | 02:58 PM
  #110  
Bestglide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 539
Likes: 23
From: 756 left...
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden
I dont work hard at all...well, my logic has done just fine for me. Better off than you are.
Trust fund kid?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20693
Yesterday 07:35 AM
iceman49
Foreign
1
05-16-2016 06:15 PM
PositiveRateGUp
Hiring News
71
03-21-2014 06:24 AM
MaroonBaboon
Hiring News
3
01-18-2013 06:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices