Where are the "official" acceptance numbers?
#221
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Lee,
No problem Lee,
I think chip has been knocked off for a few years, age has a tendency to do that. No, I was not referring to the eeoc mandated hiring, although I am aware it took place. I know a few regional pilots hhired in the late 90's early 2000 at UAL that were FOs with no PIC. On the other hand, everyone I knew as a new hire in 2007-2008 came from extensive military or civialian backgrounds w/ thousands of hours turbine/jet PIC. On the CAL side in 2007-2008 it was a different story... Many new hires were First Officers from the right seat of an Embraer jet with almost no experience. Many of them had been my First Officers at COEX. Some were excellent pilots, some you scratched your head and said what the.... The point I was simply making is when United hired last the new hires were very qualifiedwith a mix of military, civilian, and civilian ex pats who were getting back to the states. Many of my new hire class had 3 or more type ratings.
No problem Lee,
I think chip has been knocked off for a few years, age has a tendency to do that. No, I was not referring to the eeoc mandated hiring, although I am aware it took place. I know a few regional pilots hhired in the late 90's early 2000 at UAL that were FOs with no PIC. On the other hand, everyone I knew as a new hire in 2007-2008 came from extensive military or civialian backgrounds w/ thousands of hours turbine/jet PIC. On the CAL side in 2007-2008 it was a different story... Many new hires were First Officers from the right seat of an Embraer jet with almost no experience. Many of them had been my First Officers at COEX. Some were excellent pilots, some you scratched your head and said what the.... The point I was simply making is when United hired last the new hires were very qualifiedwith a mix of military, civilian, and civilian ex pats who were getting back to the states. Many of my new hire class had 3 or more type ratings.
Not sure were you collected your data points from but you are not correct. Almost all 05-07 hires were CA at COEX. I was in a 07 hire class and all COEX guys were CA. I was military with over 3000 hrs and 1900 PIC/instructor. You need to check your data and don't post without it. We hardly compare to UA of the 90s.
#223
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Aeronca Champ
Farmer,
Not sure were you collected your data points from but you are not correct. Almost all 05-07 hires were CA at COEX. I was in a 07 hire class and all COEX guys were CA. I was military with over 3000 hrs and 1900 PIC/instructor. You need to check your data and don't post without it. We hardly compare to UA of the 90s.
Not sure were you collected your data points from but you are not correct. Almost all 05-07 hires were CA at COEX. I was in a 07 hire class and all COEX guys were CA. I was military with over 3000 hrs and 1900 PIC/instructor. You need to check your data and don't post without it. We hardly compare to UA of the 90s.
I never said the majority of CAL newhires in the 2007 timeframe were inexperienced... I said there were many! For example, I had an FO with longer than standard hair with no Captain experience ever, except a c172, get hired at CAL. This pilot was an accident waiting to happen. I had another FO with no turbine PIC get hired at CAL during the same timeframe, he was a damned good pilot with experience as a freight dog under his belt and happened to be a minority. The point was, both airlines have had times where lesser experienced pilots have been hired. Most are good pilots... Some are not. I know these may not be enough "data points" to satisfy you but I am only privy to my personal experiences while at COEX from 2000-2008.
#225
Farmer,
Not sure were you collected your data points from but you are not correct. Almost all 05-07 hires were CA at COEX. I was in a 07 hire class and all COEX guys were CA. I was military with over 3000 hrs and 1900 PIC/instructor. You need to check your data and don't post without it. We hardly compare to UA of the 90s.
Not sure were you collected your data points from but you are not correct. Almost all 05-07 hires were CA at COEX. I was in a 07 hire class and all COEX guys were CA. I was military with over 3000 hrs and 1900 PIC/instructor. You need to check your data and don't post without it. We hardly compare to UA of the 90s.
#226
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
You know, the "Junior Man Winner" on the B756 outta EWR who always happens upon MANY of the HKG MX Flts, Military Charters, and all the Open Time that he can swallow??
He's a shining example of your above summary.
#227
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
The same thing happens at every airline. I fly with mostly 05-07 hires at CAL and will tell you they all do just fine within the normal variance, whether they came from fighters, heavies, commuter PIC, commuter no PIC, furloughed from a major, or any combination thereof. Yes, hiring at CAL has occasionally dipped deeper into the bucket than most, but it's been a couple of decades since that was prevalent, and by and large, those groups have done fine, too. Ironically, the only "EEOC hires" I personally know at UAL were Navy fighter pilots who were top 10% all the way through flight school, top 10 landing grades on the boat, NFWS (Topgun) grads, and combinations thereof. Pilots on both sides are well qualified... let's drop it.
#228
Lee,
No problem Lee,
I think chip has been knocked off for a few years, age has a tendency to do that. No, I was not referring to the eeoc mandated hiring, although I am aware it took place. I know a few regional pilots hhired in the late 90's early 2000 at UAL that were FOs with no PIC. On the other hand, everyone I knew as a new hire in 2007-2008 came from extensive military or civialian backgrounds w/ thousands of hours turbine/jet PIC. On the CAL side in 2007-2008 it was a different story... Many new hires were First Officers from the right seat of an Embraer jet with almost no experience. Many of them had been my First Officers at COEX. Some were excellent pilots, some you scratched your head and said what the.... The point I was simply making is when United hired last the new hires were very qualifiedwith a mix of military, civilian, and civilian ex pats who were getting back to the states. Many of my new hire class had 3 or more type ratings.
No problem Lee,
I think chip has been knocked off for a few years, age has a tendency to do that. No, I was not referring to the eeoc mandated hiring, although I am aware it took place. I know a few regional pilots hhired in the late 90's early 2000 at UAL that were FOs with no PIC. On the other hand, everyone I knew as a new hire in 2007-2008 came from extensive military or civialian backgrounds w/ thousands of hours turbine/jet PIC. On the CAL side in 2007-2008 it was a different story... Many new hires were First Officers from the right seat of an Embraer jet with almost no experience. Many of them had been my First Officers at COEX. Some were excellent pilots, some you scratched your head and said what the.... The point I was simply making is when United hired last the new hires were very qualifiedwith a mix of military, civilian, and civilian ex pats who were getting back to the states. Many of my new hire class had 3 or more type ratings.
For the new guys I saw in the 2007 time frame. They were all competent and well qualified, there just wasn't that huge pool of applicants to pull from like in the heyday. Hence the change in atmosphere of the interview referenced in another thread.
A fact that doesn't denigrate the quality of the applicants, but rather, the lower quality of the airline.
UAL in the nineties was the place to go. In my new hire class we had a 50/50 split of both military and civilian. All rose above the other 12,000 apps. All survived the interview. And for the folks interested, we had folks leave SWA, FDX, DAL, etc., to come to UAL.
I'm sure those guys are wondering what they were thinking reflecting back. But, it was a sound decision in many ways at that time. Heck, I declined SWA and DAL to go UAL......what was I thinking????
Frats,
Lee
#229
I'm not commenting on the merits or personal decisions of some of these individuals. Just confirming what was stated earlier. If it was to their advantage to do an internship and get hired preferentially than fine. Others had their resumes walked in or moved to the top of the interview pile with help from others working for the company. I don't think anyone would seriously turn down any advantage to get hired (short of crossing a picket line for the majority of us) as quickly as possible. What those people do once they get here is a different matter.
#230
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
All very charming lads but any news on Jan bid at CAL and if it may entail further new hires? Anybody chatted with CN in IAH or AC in ORD with the latest scuttlebutt?
Vet UAL 400 guy just back from TK says they are gearing up for summer classes as the big if is what happens sick time next year. FWIW.
Vet UAL 400 guy just back from TK says they are gearing up for summer classes as the big if is what happens sick time next year. FWIW.
Last edited by dvhighdrive88; 12-01-2011 at 12:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



