sCAL Bids out
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
This is why I applied to Continental Airlines. As a 2005 I was projected to be at 50 percent on the seniority list in ten years. This was before any merger!
I am currently at 66 percent and can hold 737 captain at any of our domiciles. Don't care to fly a widebody never did.
I hope the ISL is fair and equatable!
I am currently at 66 percent and can hold 737 captain at any of our domiciles. Don't care to fly a widebody never did.
I hope the ISL is fair and equatable!
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Sled
#93
This is what we were all told in the interview and in indoc. And despite the stalls due to diverting 2000 jobs to expressjet, the 9/11 tragedy, and age 65, it has turned out to be true. It was a major reason for choosing Continental, as unpopular as that was at the time.
Last edited by APC225; 01-29-2013 at 04:35 PM.
#94
I am quite sure you don't represent UAL pilots. They, as CAL pilots, understand that the contractual rights of seniority along with the the unpredictability of the company's business plan often means pilots, along with their spouses and children, get wrenched from their current location or lifestyle into another. It's the nature or our business. But none that I know of are gleeful at someone else's misfortunes, which sooner or later may be our own.
It is quite remarkable that your MEC Chair fought against an SFO 737 base because of the "emotional distress" it would cause the pilots, yet here you are delighting in the what may be a far worse fate (no one would have been displaced from SFO) for DEN pilots. The dots don't connect on this one.
It is quite remarkable that your MEC Chair fought against an SFO 737 base because of the "emotional distress" it would cause the pilots, yet here you are delighting in the what may be a far worse fate (no one would have been displaced from SFO) for DEN pilots. The dots don't connect on this one.
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
I am quite sure you don't represent UAL pilots. They, as CAL pilots, understand that the contractual rights of seniority along with the the unpredictability of the company's business plan often means pilots, along with their spouses and children, get wrenched from their current location or lifestyle into another. It's the nature or our business. But none that I know of are gleeful at someone else's misfortunes, which sooner or later may be our own.
It is quite remarkable that your MEC Chair fought against an SFO 737 base because of the "emotional distress" it would cause the pilots, yet here you are delighting in the what may be a far worse fate (no one would have been displaced from SFO) for DEN pilots. The dots don't connect on this one.
It is quite remarkable that your MEC Chair fought against an SFO 737 base because of the "emotional distress" it would cause the pilots, yet here you are delighting in the what may be a far worse fate (no one would have been displaced from SFO) for DEN pilots. The dots don't connect on this one.
Sled
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
When 17 years gets you bottom reserve right seat in DEN, it is tuff to see an 8/05 hire get a Cap seat, even if it is only a snapshot bid. The delay in the SLI (DAL/NWA had one in about 6 mo) is creating some inequities that WILL be rectified in the future. Nature of the business, like you said. Establishing an SFO 737 base would have just added salt to the wound. UCH is pushing it already.
Sled
Sled
#100
Prior to the merger, sUAL had more firm order A320s scheduled for delivery in 2013/2014 than sCAL had aircraft ordered for delivery during the period (737s and 787s). The deposits were paid and the sUAL orders are still on Airbus' official order page, so yes, let's play the game about expectations, retirements, and firm aircraft orders as I'm sure you would receive plenty of support from sUAL pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post