Search

Notices

SLI Perspective

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2013 | 01:41 PM
  #71  
I'd rather be hunting
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: B737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
YEah...an error. That's the ticket. Or maybe that is what CAL pilots held in the August 2010 bid....which is AFTER the merger announcement.

SLedster
Merger was not official until the United shareholders voted for it 17 Sep 2010.
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 01:47 PM
  #72  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Thanks! The info is there.
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 03:33 PM
  #73  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mwindaji
Merger was not official until the United shareholders voted for it 17 Sep 2010.
you might want to read past merger awards regarding constructive notice dates and "snapshot" dates. Dal/Nwa is a good example. None that I know of have used the shareholder approval date, but you never know.

Sled
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 04:30 PM
  #74  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

DAL/NWA used April 14, 2008, the MAD, as the constructive notice date. And July 2008, the date of the process agreement between DALPA and NALPA, as the "snapshot" date. (yes, it says "snapshot date" in the SLI award) Shareholders approved the merger in September.

Our MEC's have already agreed to a constructive notice date of MAD (May 2, 2010) in a Protocol Agreement signed by Pierce, Brucia, Morse, Ruark, and Prater on May 17, 2010 (the 25th anniversary of our stike). If the DAL/NWA precedent is followed, May 17th will likely be the snapshot date, since it is the date both sides agreed to the protocol. You can read this agreement for yourself. It is Attachment B in the T&PA.

Sled

Last edited by jsled; 04-10-2013 at 04:46 PM.
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:00 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
In all seriousness, and not directed at your personally, but what is the CAL "growth" that keeps being mentioned????

The CAL/sCAL fleet is virtually identical in size in 2005, 2008, 2010, and 2013 (these are the only dates I bothered to look up) and is actually smaller today than in 2008.
Ok,... my growth... in my career. (nearly a 2000 number increase)We stayed the same size... replaced old airplanes with new ones, that were able to generate more RSMs because of increased usage / efficiency / more lines etc... replaced retired pilots with new ones... we did not take the path of LUAL. Please do tell how did it go for you?

Love hearing about how once you guys were 727 Captains and now your not... well at CAL, once we were 737 captains and now we are 756 captain... Same timeframe.... different results.

Funny how the LUAL guys always talk about how the SLI will be... never is it a LCAL guy starting the thread... we only respond to your hype and hysteria....

Good luck.
See you on the walk around.
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:09 PM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Sticks and Stones, brother. For the record, I would not bet against your statement.

Sled
step brother....
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:10 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 6blade
Ok,... my growth... in my career. (nearly a 2000 number increase)We stayed the same size... replaced old airplanes with new ones, that were able to generate more RSMs because of increased usage / efficiency / more lines etc... replaced retired pilots with new ones... we did not take the path of LUAL. Please do tell how did it go for you?

Love hearing about how once you guys were 727 Captains and now your not... well at CAL, once we were 737 captains and now we are 756 captain... Same timeframe.... different results.

Funny how the LUAL guys always talk about how the SLI will be... never is it a LCAL guy starting the thread... we only respond to your hype and hysteria....

Good luck.
See you on the walk around.
Another cal guy that believes what he reads on this forum. Still doesn't understand his position - please look in the mirror and say to yourself "I'm just a cal pilot" may have to say it a couple of times.
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:11 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Sweet Jesus H. Christ, this place is gonna suck more than a tick on a two day suck for years to come. Give it a rest ladies!
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:14 PM
  #79  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Sweet Jesus H. Christ, this place is gonna suck more than a tick on a two day suck for years to come. Give it a rest ladies!
+ 1 MILLION!!!!

The merger's done. The contract's done. The SLI (or ISL) will be decided by arbitrators....
Move on....
Don't agree with it all, but....
Reply
Old 04-10-2013 | 05:17 PM
  #80  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by 6blade
Love hearing about how once you guys were 727 Captains and now your not... well at CAL, once we were 737 captains and now we are 756 captain... Same timeframe.... different results.
.
You all know this is misleading. Less than half the jobs you brought were Captain jobs. Most of those were 737 Captain jobs. There are some 757 and 777 but not that many.

Just because you let it go very junior, doesn't mean everyone there can hold those seats.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airhoss
United
11
07-05-2013 03:34 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM
EWR73FO
United
1
12-13-2012 07:05 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
4
06-15-2012 06:50 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices