Rebuttal Day 3
#21
Happy Grumpy Old Man Day, Staller!
#22
Banned
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Or the ones who came to CAL in 05/06 and stayed at CAL(and gave up their number at UAL!), and have a very senior position, status, category, career expectation at CAL while still on the street at UAL. They can and may be Captains at CAL. Should they go below their original seniority at UAL for the 'chance' they have taken? That is what the UAL list does to them!!! Someone please tell me how to logically figure that one out? And, 'give them back their original seniority at UAL' is not a valid answer, as they had already previously resigned.
#23
Or the ones who came to CAL in 05/06 and stayed at CAL(and gave up their number at UAL!), and have a very senior position, status, category, career expectation at CAL while still on the street at UAL. They can and may be Captains at CAL. Should they go below their original seniority at UAL for the 'chance' they have taken? That is what the UAL list does to them!!! Someone please tell me how to logically figure that one out? And, 'give them back their original seniority at UAL' is not a valid answer, as they had already previously resigned.
#24
Banned
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
You are correct, Staller! I am flying with one right now that was installing sprinklers during his furlough. Great guy BTW. Obviously not afraid to get his hands dirty and probably understands that he would never have gone back if not for the merger. He even moved to Houston and bought a house not far from Jay Pierce.
Happy Grumpy Old Man Day, Staller!
Happy Grumpy Old Man Day, Staller!
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Or the ones who came to CAL in 05/06 and stayed at CAL(and gave up their number at UAL!), and have a very senior position, status, category, career expectation at CAL while still on the street at UAL. They can and may be Captains at CAL. Should they go below their original seniority at UAL for the 'chance' they have taken? That is what the UAL list does to them!!! Someone please tell me how to logically figure that one out? And, 'give them back their original seniority at UAL' is not a valid answer, as they had already previously resigned.
Know of at least one LUAL pilot hired in '05 gave up LUAL number, to date, looks like it was a good move.
So the LUAL list treats the furloughed pilots as active pilots, but in reality we don't know when and if so some of these pilots will ever return. Many have decided LCAL makes a lot more sense right now.
#27
They are working under the same contract for the same employer (UCH) with a TPA that states that their acceptance (or dismissal) of the CAL job specifically means nothing for SLI. Why spend time in the schoolhouse if they are gonna end up where they end up regardless?
#28
Unlike the majority at cal, most UAL hires had skill sets that make them desirable in other professions outside aviation. I understand you guys are happy you got hired at cal - that's ok. Weather a UAL furloughed guy returns to the new United or not is his option. The UAL pilots will continue to support these guys and their rights to return to the new United at a senority number that factors in their "career expectations". Your greed is starting to show or is it your limitations!
#29
Know of at least one LUAL pilot hired in '05 gave up LUAL number, to date, looks like it was a good move.
So the LUAL list treats the furloughed pilots as active pilots, but in reality we don't know when and if so some of these pilots will ever return. Many have decided LCAL makes a lot more sense right now.
So the LUAL list treats the furloughed pilots as active pilots, but in reality we don't know when and if so some of these pilots will ever return. Many have decided LCAL makes a lot more sense right now.
......and I know a few guys who ditched CAL (both 2005 hires) to return to UAL. Who cares?
#30
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
They are working under the same contract for the same employer (UCH) with a TPA that states that their acceptance (or dismissal) of the CAL job specifically means nothing for SLI. Why spend time in the schoolhouse if they are gonna end up where they end up regardless?
Any LUAL Pilot who is currently flying under the LCAL side of the house has a huge advantage once the SLI is done. They are on line, in base on a piece of equipment that someone "senior" to them from the LUAL list may want.
case in point-
There is a friend of mine who is a late 99 LUAL Hire. He is currently a line holding 756 FO in EWR. He has not been recalled to LUAL (yet).
What happens once we have an ISL? There are going to be pilots who were and are senior to him on his (old) LUAL list.. but have not yet been recalled.
Aren't recalls based on vacancies? What happens when pilots get recalled to a position that isn't what they want or could/should be able to hold? And there are pilots junior to them sitting in a BES they want?!
Also, how long will it take to recall and get every trained? That is, everyone who wants to come back.
Once we have an ISL, we will open up the next new can of worms.
While it's been stated that those LUAL Pilots who accepted (or refused) a position on the LCAL list will have no bearing in the SLI, there's going to be no mistake that those who accepted a position will actually end up in a better position than those who refused... and maybe even some who were never furloughed!
What happens next Spring when we have a list.. and you have 10 EWR (NYC) 756 FO Vacancies? Do all active pilots get to bid that or do 10 returning Furloughs get to bid that?!
Remember, they have stated "no flush bid"..
It'll be sometime 2014 and probably 2015 before this all sorts itself out.
Gonna be fun to watch~
Motch
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



